Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block

BackgroundThe electrocardiographic interatrial block (IAB) has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to test whether IAB can improve risk prediction of AF for the individual person. Methods and ResultsDigital ECGs of 152 759 primary care patients aged 50 to 90 years were collected...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morten W. Skov, Jonas Ghouse, Jørgen T. Kühl, Pyotr G. Platonov, Claus Graff, Andreas Fuchs, Peter V. Rasmussen, Adrian Pietersen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Christian Torp‐Pedersen, Steen M. Hansen, Morten S. Olesen, Stig Haunsø, Lars Køber, Thomas A. Gerds, Klaus F. Kofoed, Jesper H. Svendsen, Anders G. Holst, Jonas B. Nielsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.008247
_version_ 1819182665238052864
author Morten W. Skov
Jonas Ghouse
Jørgen T. Kühl
Pyotr G. Platonov
Claus Graff
Andreas Fuchs
Peter V. Rasmussen
Adrian Pietersen
Børge G. Nordestgaard
Christian Torp‐Pedersen
Steen M. Hansen
Morten S. Olesen
Stig Haunsø
Lars Køber
Thomas A. Gerds
Klaus F. Kofoed
Jesper H. Svendsen
Anders G. Holst
Jonas B. Nielsen
author_facet Morten W. Skov
Jonas Ghouse
Jørgen T. Kühl
Pyotr G. Platonov
Claus Graff
Andreas Fuchs
Peter V. Rasmussen
Adrian Pietersen
Børge G. Nordestgaard
Christian Torp‐Pedersen
Steen M. Hansen
Morten S. Olesen
Stig Haunsø
Lars Køber
Thomas A. Gerds
Klaus F. Kofoed
Jesper H. Svendsen
Anders G. Holst
Jonas B. Nielsen
author_sort Morten W. Skov
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe electrocardiographic interatrial block (IAB) has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to test whether IAB can improve risk prediction of AF for the individual person. Methods and ResultsDigital ECGs of 152 759 primary care patients aged 50 to 90 years were collected from 2001 to 2011. We identified individuals with P‐wave ≥120 ms and the presence of none, 1, 2, or 3 biphasic P‐waves in inferior leads. Data on comorbidity, medication, and outcomes were obtained from nationwide registries. We observed a dose‐response relationship between the number of biphasic P‐waves in inferior leads and the hazard of AF during follow‐up. Discrimination of the 10‐year outcome of AF, measured by time‐dependent area under the curve, was increased by 1.09% (95% confidence interval 0.43–1.74%) for individuals with cardiovascular disease at baseline (CVD) and 1.01% (95% confidence interval 0.40–1.62%) for individuals without CVD, when IAB was added to a conventional risk model for AF. The highest effect of IAB on the absolute risk of AF was observed in individuals aged 60 to 70 years with CVD. In this subgroup, the 10‐year risk of AF was 50% in those with advanced IAB compared with 10% in those with a normal P‐wave. In general, individuals with advanced IAB and no CVD had a higher risk of AF than patients with CVD and no IAB. ConclusionsIAB improves risk prediction of AF when added to a conventional risk model. Clinicians may consider monitoring patients with IAB more closely for the occurrence of AF, especially for high‐risk subgroups.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T22:49:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7963d72bd1364e259fec4727803a9609
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T22:49:44Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-7963d72bd1364e259fec4727803a96092022-12-21T18:09:59ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802018-06-0171110.1161/JAHA.117.008247Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial BlockMorten W. Skov0Jonas Ghouse1Jørgen T. Kühl2Pyotr G. Platonov3Claus Graff4Andreas Fuchs5Peter V. Rasmussen6Adrian Pietersen7Børge G. Nordestgaard8Christian Torp‐Pedersen9Steen M. Hansen10Morten S. Olesen11Stig Haunsø12Lars Køber13Thomas A. Gerds14Klaus F. Kofoed15Jesper H. Svendsen16Anders G. Holst17Jonas B. Nielsen18Laboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkLaboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkCenter for Integrative Electrocardiography at Lund University and Arrhythmia Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, SwedenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkLaboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen General Practitioners’ Laboratory, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and the Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital University of Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkLaboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkLaboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkLaboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkLaboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkLaboratory for Molecular Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen, DenmarkBackgroundThe electrocardiographic interatrial block (IAB) has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to test whether IAB can improve risk prediction of AF for the individual person. Methods and ResultsDigital ECGs of 152 759 primary care patients aged 50 to 90 years were collected from 2001 to 2011. We identified individuals with P‐wave ≥120 ms and the presence of none, 1, 2, or 3 biphasic P‐waves in inferior leads. Data on comorbidity, medication, and outcomes were obtained from nationwide registries. We observed a dose‐response relationship between the number of biphasic P‐waves in inferior leads and the hazard of AF during follow‐up. Discrimination of the 10‐year outcome of AF, measured by time‐dependent area under the curve, was increased by 1.09% (95% confidence interval 0.43–1.74%) for individuals with cardiovascular disease at baseline (CVD) and 1.01% (95% confidence interval 0.40–1.62%) for individuals without CVD, when IAB was added to a conventional risk model for AF. The highest effect of IAB on the absolute risk of AF was observed in individuals aged 60 to 70 years with CVD. In this subgroup, the 10‐year risk of AF was 50% in those with advanced IAB compared with 10% in those with a normal P‐wave. In general, individuals with advanced IAB and no CVD had a higher risk of AF than patients with CVD and no IAB. ConclusionsIAB improves risk prediction of AF when added to a conventional risk model. Clinicians may consider monitoring patients with IAB more closely for the occurrence of AF, especially for high‐risk subgroups.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.008247atrial fibrillationECGepidemiologyinteratrialinteratrial blockischemic stroke
spellingShingle Morten W. Skov
Jonas Ghouse
Jørgen T. Kühl
Pyotr G. Platonov
Claus Graff
Andreas Fuchs
Peter V. Rasmussen
Adrian Pietersen
Børge G. Nordestgaard
Christian Torp‐Pedersen
Steen M. Hansen
Morten S. Olesen
Stig Haunsø
Lars Køber
Thomas A. Gerds
Klaus F. Kofoed
Jesper H. Svendsen
Anders G. Holst
Jonas B. Nielsen
Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
atrial fibrillation
ECG
epidemiology
interatrial
interatrial block
ischemic stroke
title Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block
title_full Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block
title_fullStr Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block
title_full_unstemmed Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block
title_short Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block
title_sort risk prediction of atrial fibrillation based on electrocardiographic interatrial block
topic atrial fibrillation
ECG
epidemiology
interatrial
interatrial block
ischemic stroke
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.008247
work_keys_str_mv AT mortenwskov riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT jonasghouse riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT jørgentkuhl riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT pyotrgplatonov riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT clausgraff riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT andreasfuchs riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT petervrasmussen riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT adrianpietersen riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT børgegnordestgaard riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT christiantorppedersen riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT steenmhansen riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT mortensolesen riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT stighaunsø riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT larskøber riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT thomasagerds riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT klausfkofoed riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT jesperhsvendsen riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT andersgholst riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock
AT jonasbnielsen riskpredictionofatrialfibrillationbasedonelectrocardiographicinteratrialblock