Coverage of isoniazid preventive therapy among people living with HIV; A retrospective cohort study in Tanzania (2012-2016)

Background: Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) is a proven public health tool to reduce Tuberculosis (TB) among people living with HIV. However, its implementation in most countries is suboptimal. This retrospective study was conducted to determine the coverage and factors associated with IPT initia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Werner Maokola, Bernard Ngowi, Lovetti Lawson, Masanja Robert, Michael Mahande, Jim Todd, Sia Msuya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-02-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220325078
Description
Summary:Background: Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) is a proven public health tool to reduce Tuberculosis (TB) among people living with HIV. However, its implementation in most countries is suboptimal. This retrospective study was conducted to determine the coverage and factors associated with IPT initiation to inform program scale up and improve quality of service in Tanzania and elsewhere. Methods: Retrospective cohort study design involving HIV clinics in Dar es Salaam, Iringa and Njombe regions from January 2012 to December 2016. Results: A total of 171,743 PLHIV were in the cohort from 2012 to 2016. Of these, 166,709 were involved in the analysis. Of those analyzed, 23,970 (14.38%) were ever initiated on IPT. Female sex (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.13, P < 0.001), obesity (aOR = 1.29, 95% CI:1.20−1.39, P < 0.001), WHO clinical stage II (aOR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.42−1.55, P < 0.001), enrolment in hospitals (aOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.89−2.06, P < 0.001), enrolment in Njombe region (aOR = 1.25: 95% CI: 1.18−1.33, P < 0.001) and enrolment in public health facilities (aOR = 1.93: 95% CI: 1.82−2.04, P < 0.001) were associated with increased IPT uptake. Being on ART (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.65−0.70, P < 0.001) and severe nutritional status (aOR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60−0.88, P < 0.001) were associated with decreased IPT initiation. Conclusions: Our study documented low IPT initiation in the study area as well as documented factors which enable IPT initiation and those which impair IPT initiation. Strategies are needed to work on barriers and sustain enabling factors to improve IPT coverage.
ISSN:1201-9712