Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases
Assessing argumentative writing skills is not a straightforward task, as multiple elements need to be considered. In function of providing feedback to students and keeping track of their progress, evaluating argumentative texts in a suitable, valid and efficient way is important. In this state-of-th...
Main Authors: | Yana Landrieu, Fien De Smedt, Hilde Van Keer, Bram De Wever |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.784261/full |
Similar Items
-
The role of writing motives in the interplay between implicit theories, achievement goals, self-efficacy, and writing performance
by: Fien De Smedt, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01) -
Non-native English Speaking Teachers’ Pragmatic Criteria in the Holistic and Analytic Rating of the Agreement Speech Act Productions of Iranian EFL Learners
by: Minoo Alemi, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Assessing critical thinking through L2 argumentative essays: an investigation of relevant and salient criteria from raters’ perspectives
by: Takanori Sato
Published: (2022-04-01) -
Written Argumentation for Different Audiences. A Study of Addressivity and the Uses of Arguments in Argumentative Student Texts
by: Hege Myklebust, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Temporal Passage and the 'no alternate possibilities' argument
by: Jonathan Tallant