Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession Considerations

As the European Union candidate country (hereinafter the EU), Ukraine is one step away from becoming an EU Member State. From this point on, the country will be subject to the influence of EU institutions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter the CJEU). It is suggested...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nataliya Haletska, Anastasiia Savchuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2023-12-01
Series:Review of European and Comparative Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/recl/article/view/16641
_version_ 1827313200888020992
author Nataliya Haletska
Anastasiia Savchuk
author_facet Nataliya Haletska
Anastasiia Savchuk
author_sort Nataliya Haletska
collection DOAJ
description As the European Union candidate country (hereinafter the EU), Ukraine is one step away from becoming an EU Member State. From this point on, the country will be subject to the influence of EU institutions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter the CJEU). It is suggested that upon the accession of Ukraine, the CJEU’s impact will be comparable to the influence on legal orders of other EU Members States provided necessary preparatory steps, such as training for judges, are taken. It is established that the main functions of the CJEU are to interpret and ensure the uniform application of EU law in each EU Member State, to ensure compliance with EU law by EU countries and institutions, to ensure respect for the rights and freedoms of individuals, to provide clarifications to national courts, and to promote “positive integration” and “negative integration” of EU Member States. With respect to the above-mentioned functions, it is argued that the CJEU will become an effective tool for Ukraine after it accedes to the EU. It will facilitate the harmonization of national legislation with EU standards through the application of precedents by national courts, influence the activities of legislative bodies, and help prevent future complaints by becoming an additional “quasi-supervisory” body in Ukraine. It will also provide interpretation of the EU law at the request of national courts through the preliminary rulings and procedures, protecting human rights and freedoms by enabling individuals to apply to the CJEU for protection. At the same time, arguably, Ukraine will also impact the functioning of the CJEU by increasing the caseload and appointing judges from Ukraine as well as potentially Advocate-General. Given these potential implications, certain preparatory actions, like preparing a cadre reserve, may be considered at the present moment. Finally, the authors argue that even before Ukraine’s accession, the CJEU has an indirect impact on the Ukrainian legal order. It is suggested that constitutional amendments, as well as certain institutional changes like the establishment of an impartial judicial system and empowering a Ukrainian state body with powers to execute CJEU decisions, will need to take place prior to the accession, which is a demonstration of the CJEU’s indirect influence.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T21:57:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7973f66fdf154eda803ff99cd4ed4375
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2545-384X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T21:57:55Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series Review of European and Comparative Law
spelling doaj.art-7973f66fdf154eda803ff99cd4ed43752024-03-20T13:42:11ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinReview of European and Comparative Law2545-384X2023-12-0155410.31743/recl.16641Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession ConsiderationsNataliya Haletska0Anastasiia Savchuk1Ukrainian Catholic UniversityUkrainian Catholic University As the European Union candidate country (hereinafter the EU), Ukraine is one step away from becoming an EU Member State. From this point on, the country will be subject to the influence of EU institutions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter the CJEU). It is suggested that upon the accession of Ukraine, the CJEU’s impact will be comparable to the influence on legal orders of other EU Members States provided necessary preparatory steps, such as training for judges, are taken. It is established that the main functions of the CJEU are to interpret and ensure the uniform application of EU law in each EU Member State, to ensure compliance with EU law by EU countries and institutions, to ensure respect for the rights and freedoms of individuals, to provide clarifications to national courts, and to promote “positive integration” and “negative integration” of EU Member States. With respect to the above-mentioned functions, it is argued that the CJEU will become an effective tool for Ukraine after it accedes to the EU. It will facilitate the harmonization of national legislation with EU standards through the application of precedents by national courts, influence the activities of legislative bodies, and help prevent future complaints by becoming an additional “quasi-supervisory” body in Ukraine. It will also provide interpretation of the EU law at the request of national courts through the preliminary rulings and procedures, protecting human rights and freedoms by enabling individuals to apply to the CJEU for protection. At the same time, arguably, Ukraine will also impact the functioning of the CJEU by increasing the caseload and appointing judges from Ukraine as well as potentially Advocate-General. Given these potential implications, certain preparatory actions, like preparing a cadre reserve, may be considered at the present moment. Finally, the authors argue that even before Ukraine’s accession, the CJEU has an indirect impact on the Ukrainian legal order. It is suggested that constitutional amendments, as well as certain institutional changes like the establishment of an impartial judicial system and empowering a Ukrainian state body with powers to execute CJEU decisions, will need to take place prior to the accession, which is a demonstration of the CJEU’s indirect influence. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/recl/article/view/16641Court of Justice of the European Unioncourt systempreliminary rulinginterpretationharmonization
spellingShingle Nataliya Haletska
Anastasiia Savchuk
Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession Considerations
Review of European and Comparative Law
Court of Justice of the European Union
court system
preliminary ruling
interpretation
harmonization
title Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession Considerations
title_full Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession Considerations
title_fullStr Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession Considerations
title_short Court of Justice of the European Union and Ukrainian Legal Order: Some Pre-accession Considerations
title_sort court of justice of the european union and ukrainian legal order some pre accession considerations
topic Court of Justice of the European Union
court system
preliminary ruling
interpretation
harmonization
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/recl/article/view/16641
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliyahaletska courtofjusticeoftheeuropeanunionandukrainianlegalordersomepreaccessionconsiderations
AT anastasiiasavchuk courtofjusticeoftheeuropeanunionandukrainianlegalordersomepreaccessionconsiderations