#256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims: Telemedicine refers to the delivery of healthcare services through the use of information and communication technology, across distances. There has been a significant increase in the demand for infertility treatment and virtual consultations from home after the COVID-19 pandemic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huy-Phuong Tran, Nam-Nhat Nguyen, Tuong-Nguyen Ho, Thuy-Thi-Thanh Tran, Loc-Thai Ly, Tuyet-Thi-Diem Hoang, Dung-Thi-Phuong Le, Toi-Van Vo, Giang-Le Tran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: World Scientific Publishing 2023-12-01
Series:Fertility & Reproduction
Online Access:https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2661318223743783
_version_ 1797237003512709120
author Huy-Phuong Tran
Nam-Nhat Nguyen
Tuong-Nguyen Ho
Thuy-Thi-Thanh Tran
Loc-Thai Ly
Tuyet-Thi-Diem Hoang
Dung-Thi-Phuong Le
Toi-Van Vo
Giang-Le Tran
author_facet Huy-Phuong Tran
Nam-Nhat Nguyen
Tuong-Nguyen Ho
Thuy-Thi-Thanh Tran
Loc-Thai Ly
Tuyet-Thi-Diem Hoang
Dung-Thi-Phuong Le
Toi-Van Vo
Giang-Le Tran
author_sort Huy-Phuong Tran
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Telemedicine refers to the delivery of healthcare services through the use of information and communication technology, across distances. There has been a significant increase in the demand for infertility treatment and virtual consultations from home after the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, due to a lack of sufficient data, and concerns about patient compliance, telemedicine has struggled to gain widespread acceptance. Our aim was to compare the success of treatment between telemedicine and in-office care during assisted reproduction treatment. Additionally, we evaluated patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Method: We conducted a literature search of published articles in the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to November 30, 2022. We used the keywords “telemedicine” or “telehealth” and “in vitro fertilization” or “assisted reproduction”. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included in the search. We registered our protocol on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022379428). Results: We identified 14 studies that reported data on 5182 patients. Quality assessment revealed an acceptable risk of bias for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The data showed that telemedicine was non-inferior to in-person care in terms of pregnancy rate achieved (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83–1.25, p = 0.84). The Q test p-value of 0.99 and I2 statistic of 0% indicated that all the included studies were homogeneous. Patients who received telemedicine follow-ups during fertility treatment reported adequate satisfaction (88%, 95% CI: 77%-94%). Eggers’ test did not indicate the presence of Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.62), confirming that no publication bias was found. Conclusion: Telemedicine use has resulted in a comparable treatment success rate in terms of pregnancy rate, when compared to face-to-face consultation. These emerging tools also yielded a high level of patient satisfaction.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T17:12:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7974f72720b64bd9b99ecfe0c22f41e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2661-3182
2661-3174
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T17:12:50Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher World Scientific Publishing
record_format Article
series Fertility & Reproduction
spelling doaj.art-7974f72720b64bd9b99ecfe0c22f41e22024-03-28T07:54:19ZengWorld Scientific PublishingFertility & Reproduction2661-31822661-31742023-12-01050465565510.1142/S2661318223743783#256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-AnalysisHuy-Phuong Tran0Nam-Nhat Nguyen1Tuong-Nguyen Ho2Thuy-Thi-Thanh Tran3Loc-Thai Ly4Tuyet-Thi-Diem Hoang5Dung-Thi-Phuong Le6Toi-Van Vo7Giang-Le Tran8Infertility Department - Hung Vuong Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamCollege of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanCollege of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanInfertility Department - Hung Vuong Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamInfertility Department - Hung Vuong Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamInfertility Department - Hung Vuong Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamInfertility Department - Hung Vuong Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamSchool of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Vietnam National University HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamSchool of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Vietnam National University HCMC, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamBackground and Aims: Telemedicine refers to the delivery of healthcare services through the use of information and communication technology, across distances. There has been a significant increase in the demand for infertility treatment and virtual consultations from home after the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, due to a lack of sufficient data, and concerns about patient compliance, telemedicine has struggled to gain widespread acceptance. Our aim was to compare the success of treatment between telemedicine and in-office care during assisted reproduction treatment. Additionally, we evaluated patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Method: We conducted a literature search of published articles in the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to November 30, 2022. We used the keywords “telemedicine” or “telehealth” and “in vitro fertilization” or “assisted reproduction”. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included in the search. We registered our protocol on PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022379428). Results: We identified 14 studies that reported data on 5182 patients. Quality assessment revealed an acceptable risk of bias for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The data showed that telemedicine was non-inferior to in-person care in terms of pregnancy rate achieved (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83–1.25, p = 0.84). The Q test p-value of 0.99 and I2 statistic of 0% indicated that all the included studies were homogeneous. Patients who received telemedicine follow-ups during fertility treatment reported adequate satisfaction (88%, 95% CI: 77%-94%). Eggers’ test did not indicate the presence of Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.62), confirming that no publication bias was found. Conclusion: Telemedicine use has resulted in a comparable treatment success rate in terms of pregnancy rate, when compared to face-to-face consultation. These emerging tools also yielded a high level of patient satisfaction.https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2661318223743783
spellingShingle Huy-Phuong Tran
Nam-Nhat Nguyen
Tuong-Nguyen Ho
Thuy-Thi-Thanh Tran
Loc-Thai Ly
Tuyet-Thi-Diem Hoang
Dung-Thi-Phuong Le
Toi-Van Vo
Giang-Le Tran
#256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis
Fertility & Reproduction
title #256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis
title_full #256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr #256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed #256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis
title_short #256 : Reproductive Outcomes and Satisfaction Among Patients Using Telemedicine During Assisted Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort 256 reproductive outcomes and satisfaction among patients using telemedicine during assisted reproduction a meta analysis
url https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2661318223743783
work_keys_str_mv AT huyphuongtran 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT namnhatnguyen 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT tuongnguyenho 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT thuythithanhtran 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT locthaily 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT tuyetthidiemhoang 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT dungthiphuongle 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT toivanvo 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis
AT giangletran 256reproductiveoutcomesandsatisfactionamongpatientsusingtelemedicineduringassistedreproductionametaanalysis