“And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus

The focus of this article is J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus (1933), his fictional representation of the slave rebellion in ancient Rome led by the eponymous gladiator. The article begins by examining Mitchell’s contribution to debates over the role of the revolutionary writer in Left Review in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scott Lyall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2022-12-01
Series:Clotho
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/clotho/article/view/11511
_version_ 1828004531210813440
author Scott Lyall
author_facet Scott Lyall
author_sort Scott Lyall
collection DOAJ
description The focus of this article is J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus (1933), his fictional representation of the slave rebellion in ancient Rome led by the eponymous gladiator. The article begins by examining Mitchell’s contribution to debates over the role of the revolutionary writer in Left Review in the mid-1930s and his place in the British Left in this era, before going on to survey the ways in which the figure of Spartacus and the German Spartacists are represented across Mitchell’s oeuvre. It then explores key source material utilized in the writing of the novel, as well as outlining comparisons between Mitchell’s representation of Spartacus and those of his fellow novelists Howard Fast and Arthur Koestler. Including close readings of Spartacus and informed by archival research and previously unpublished manuscript items, the article argues that at the same time as denouncing the cruelties of Roman rule, Spartacus also signals Mitchell’s passionate opposition to what he considered the violent histories of oppression suffered by the commons of the earth of all times, culminating in the capitalist crisis of Mitchell’s own period in the 1930s. Mitchell creates this effect of historical simultaneity by writing a work of myth-history – as opposed to historical realism or political propaganda – that employs the utopian legend of the Golden Age to inspire radical dissent against modern deprivation.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:16:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7976d0ee05ba4c83b49dc20e0b4bab83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2670-6210
2670-6229
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:16:16Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Clotho
spelling doaj.art-7976d0ee05ba4c83b49dc20e0b4bab832023-02-25T08:07:51ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Clotho2670-62102670-62292022-12-014210.4312/clotho.4.2.127-152“And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s SpartacusScott Lyall0Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom The focus of this article is J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus (1933), his fictional representation of the slave rebellion in ancient Rome led by the eponymous gladiator. The article begins by examining Mitchell’s contribution to debates over the role of the revolutionary writer in Left Review in the mid-1930s and his place in the British Left in this era, before going on to survey the ways in which the figure of Spartacus and the German Spartacists are represented across Mitchell’s oeuvre. It then explores key source material utilized in the writing of the novel, as well as outlining comparisons between Mitchell’s representation of Spartacus and those of his fellow novelists Howard Fast and Arthur Koestler. Including close readings of Spartacus and informed by archival research and previously unpublished manuscript items, the article argues that at the same time as denouncing the cruelties of Roman rule, Spartacus also signals Mitchell’s passionate opposition to what he considered the violent histories of oppression suffered by the commons of the earth of all times, culminating in the capitalist crisis of Mitchell’s own period in the 1930s. Mitchell creates this effect of historical simultaneity by writing a work of myth-history – as opposed to historical realism or political propaganda – that employs the utopian legend of the Golden Age to inspire radical dissent against modern deprivation. https://journals.uni-lj.si/clotho/article/view/11511SpartacusJ. Leslie Mitchell (1901–35)Lewis Grassic Gibboncommunismmyth-history
spellingShingle Scott Lyall
“And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus
Clotho
Spartacus
J. Leslie Mitchell (1901–35)
Lewis Grassic Gibbon
communism
myth-history
title “And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus
title_full “And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus
title_fullStr “And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus
title_full_unstemmed “And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus
title_short “And so with the moderns”: The Role of the Revolutionary Writer and the Mythicization of History in J. Leslie Mitchell’s Spartacus
title_sort and so with the moderns the role of the revolutionary writer and the mythicization of history in j leslie mitchell s spartacus
topic Spartacus
J. Leslie Mitchell (1901–35)
Lewis Grassic Gibbon
communism
myth-history
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/clotho/article/view/11511
work_keys_str_mv AT scottlyall andsowiththemodernstheroleoftherevolutionarywriterandthemythicizationofhistoryinjlesliemitchellsspartacus