Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinate
The COVID-19 pandemic uprooted economies, infected millions, and altered behaviors. Yet, the invisible nature of the disease, paralleled symptoms to the common flu, and misinformation generated COVID-19 disbelief. Many believed COVID-19 was a hoax. Many believed case numbers were fabricated. Others...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Acta Psychologica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691821001323 |
_version_ | 1819108092352135168 |
---|---|
author | Stephen Bok Daniel E. Martin Maria Lee |
author_facet | Stephen Bok Daniel E. Martin Maria Lee |
author_sort | Stephen Bok |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic uprooted economies, infected millions, and altered behaviors. Yet, the invisible nature of the disease, paralleled symptoms to the common flu, and misinformation generated COVID-19 disbelief. Many believed COVID-19 was a hoax. Many believed case numbers were fabricated. Others claimed it was a ruse for sociopolitical reasons. The construction of the 8-item COVID-19 Disbelief Scale (CDS) measures the false belief COVID-19 was not real and life-threatening. The CDS demonstrated discriminant validity and robust reliability across two studies. Predictive analysis evinced COVID-19 disbelievers feared COVID-19 less and had lower intent to get vaccinated. In the U.S., certain religious organizations spread misinformation. Religiosity associated with greater COVID-19 disbelief. Among disbelievers, conditional indirect effects of religiosity associated with greater COVID-19 fear and higher intent to get vaccinated. The moderated mediation model validated utility of the CDS as a concise instrument to study variable relationships. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:04:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-79898675f0364a5487519a55399f85bb |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0001-6918 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:04:26Z |
publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Acta Psychologica |
spelling | doaj.art-79898675f0364a5487519a55399f85bb2022-12-21T18:41:06ZengElsevierActa Psychologica0001-69182021-09-01219103382Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinateStephen Bok0Daniel E. Martin1Maria Lee2Department of Marketing, College of Business and Economics, California State University East Bay, United States of America; Corresponding author.Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, California State University East Bay, United States of AmericaUniversity of California, Irvine, United States of AmericaThe COVID-19 pandemic uprooted economies, infected millions, and altered behaviors. Yet, the invisible nature of the disease, paralleled symptoms to the common flu, and misinformation generated COVID-19 disbelief. Many believed COVID-19 was a hoax. Many believed case numbers were fabricated. Others claimed it was a ruse for sociopolitical reasons. The construction of the 8-item COVID-19 Disbelief Scale (CDS) measures the false belief COVID-19 was not real and life-threatening. The CDS demonstrated discriminant validity and robust reliability across two studies. Predictive analysis evinced COVID-19 disbelievers feared COVID-19 less and had lower intent to get vaccinated. In the U.S., certain religious organizations spread misinformation. Religiosity associated with greater COVID-19 disbelief. Among disbelievers, conditional indirect effects of religiosity associated with greater COVID-19 fear and higher intent to get vaccinated. The moderated mediation model validated utility of the CDS as a concise instrument to study variable relationships.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691821001323COVID-19 Disbelief ScaleSARS-CoV-2Construct validityReliabilityReligiosityFear |
spellingShingle | Stephen Bok Daniel E. Martin Maria Lee Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinate Acta Psychologica COVID-19 Disbelief Scale SARS-CoV-2 Construct validity Reliability Religiosity Fear |
title | Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinate |
title_full | Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinate |
title_fullStr | Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinate |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinate |
title_short | Validation of the COVID-19 Disbelief Scale: Conditional indirect effects of religiosity and COVID-19 fear on intent to vaccinate |
title_sort | validation of the covid 19 disbelief scale conditional indirect effects of religiosity and covid 19 fear on intent to vaccinate |
topic | COVID-19 Disbelief Scale SARS-CoV-2 Construct validity Reliability Religiosity Fear |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691821001323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stephenbok validationofthecovid19disbeliefscaleconditionalindirecteffectsofreligiosityandcovid19fearonintenttovaccinate AT danielemartin validationofthecovid19disbeliefscaleconditionalindirecteffectsofreligiosityandcovid19fearonintenttovaccinate AT marialee validationofthecovid19disbeliefscaleconditionalindirecteffectsofreligiosityandcovid19fearonintenttovaccinate |