Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptasensor

An elevated level of low density lipoprotein (LDL) can lead to the cardiovascular system-related diseases, such as atherosclerosis and others. Therefore, fast, simple, and accurate methods for LDL detection are very desirable. In this work, the parameters characterizing the electrochemical immuno-an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daria Rudewicz-Kowalczyk, Iwona Grabowska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/22/7733
_version_ 1827675373253427200
author Daria Rudewicz-Kowalczyk
Iwona Grabowska
author_facet Daria Rudewicz-Kowalczyk
Iwona Grabowska
author_sort Daria Rudewicz-Kowalczyk
collection DOAJ
description An elevated level of low density lipoprotein (LDL) can lead to the cardiovascular system-related diseases, such as atherosclerosis and others. Therefore, fast, simple, and accurate methods for LDL detection are very desirable. In this work, the parameters characterizing the electrochemical immuno-and aptasensor for detection of LDL have been compared for the first time. An immunosensor has been designed, for which the anti-apolipoprotein B-100 antibody was covalently attached to 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP) on the surface of the gold electrode. In the case of an aptasensor, the gold electrode was modified in a mixture of ssDNA aptamer specific for LDL modified with –SH group and 6-mercaptohexanol. Square-wave voltammetry has been used for detection of LDL in PBS containing redox active marker, [Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3−/4−</sup>. Our results show the linear dependence of [Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3−/4−</sup> redox signal changes on LDL concentration for both biosensors, in the range from 0.01 ng/mL to 1.0 ng/mL. The limit of detection was 0.31 and 0.25 ng/mL, for immuno- and aptasensor, respectively. Whereas slightly better selectivity toward human serum albumin (HSA), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and malondialdehyde modified low density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) has been observed for aptasensor. Moreover, the other components of human blood serum samples did not influence aptasensor sensitivity.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:04:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79901b11146744449a1b10d8e7eda2f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:04:11Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-79901b11146744449a1b10d8e7eda2f62023-11-23T01:28:53ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-11-012122773310.3390/s21227733Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and AptasensorDaria Rudewicz-Kowalczyk0Iwona Grabowska1Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10-748 Olsztyn, PolandInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Tuwima 10, 10-748 Olsztyn, PolandAn elevated level of low density lipoprotein (LDL) can lead to the cardiovascular system-related diseases, such as atherosclerosis and others. Therefore, fast, simple, and accurate methods for LDL detection are very desirable. In this work, the parameters characterizing the electrochemical immuno-and aptasensor for detection of LDL have been compared for the first time. An immunosensor has been designed, for which the anti-apolipoprotein B-100 antibody was covalently attached to 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP) on the surface of the gold electrode. In the case of an aptasensor, the gold electrode was modified in a mixture of ssDNA aptamer specific for LDL modified with –SH group and 6-mercaptohexanol. Square-wave voltammetry has been used for detection of LDL in PBS containing redox active marker, [Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3−/4−</sup>. Our results show the linear dependence of [Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3−/4−</sup> redox signal changes on LDL concentration for both biosensors, in the range from 0.01 ng/mL to 1.0 ng/mL. The limit of detection was 0.31 and 0.25 ng/mL, for immuno- and aptasensor, respectively. Whereas slightly better selectivity toward human serum albumin (HSA), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and malondialdehyde modified low density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) has been observed for aptasensor. Moreover, the other components of human blood serum samples did not influence aptasensor sensitivity.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/22/7733low-density lipoprotein (LDL)aptasensorimmunosensorelectrochemical detection
spellingShingle Daria Rudewicz-Kowalczyk
Iwona Grabowska
Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptasensor
Sensors
low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
aptasensor
immunosensor
electrochemical detection
title Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptasensor
title_full Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptasensor
title_fullStr Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptasensor
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptasensor
title_short Detection of Low Density Lipoprotein—Comparison of Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptasensor
title_sort detection of low density lipoprotein comparison of electrochemical immuno and aptasensor
topic low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
aptasensor
immunosensor
electrochemical detection
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/22/7733
work_keys_str_mv AT dariarudewiczkowalczyk detectionoflowdensitylipoproteincomparisonofelectrochemicalimmunoandaptasensor
AT iwonagrabowska detectionoflowdensitylipoproteincomparisonofelectrochemicalimmunoandaptasensor