Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation

Abstract Purpose The study aims to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to (1) define the virtual valid length of pterygoid implants in maxillary atrophic patients from the prosthetic prioritized driven position and (2) measure the implant length engaged in the pterygoid process according to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuanyuan Sun, Chunfeng Xu, Ningtao Wang, Yiqun Wu, Yuelian Liu, Shengchi Fan, Feng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-03-01
Series:International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00472-4
_version_ 1797853789623943168
author Yuanyuan Sun
Chunfeng Xu
Ningtao Wang
Yiqun Wu
Yuelian Liu
Shengchi Fan
Feng Wang
author_facet Yuanyuan Sun
Chunfeng Xu
Ningtao Wang
Yiqun Wu
Yuelian Liu
Shengchi Fan
Feng Wang
author_sort Yuanyuan Sun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose The study aims to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to (1) define the virtual valid length of pterygoid implants in maxillary atrophic patients from the prosthetic prioritized driven position and (2) measure the implant length engaged in the pterygoid process according to the HU difference of the pterygoid maxillary junction. Materials and methods Virtual pterygoid implants were planned with CBCT of maxillary atrophic patients in the software. The entry and angulation of the implant were planned according to the prosthetic prioritized driven position in the 3D reconstruction image. The planned implant length and the valid length defined as the implant between the pterygoid maxillary junction and pterygoid fossa were recorded. The relationship between the implant and sinus cavity was also evaluated. Results A total of 120 CBCT samples were enrolled and virtually planned. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 ± 13.2 years. One hundred and sixteen samples could successfully place virtual implants according to the criterion. The mean implant length and mean implant length beyond the pterygoid maxillary junction were 16.3 ± 4.2 mm (range, 11.5–18 mm) and 7.1 ± 3.3 mm (range, 1.5–11.4 mm), respectively. Ninety percent of virtually planned implants had a close relationship with the sinus cavity, and implants exhibited longer lengths when they had no relation with the sinus. Conclusion From a prosthetic prioritized driven position with fixed entry and angulation, pterygoid implants achieve adequate bone anchorage length beyond the pterygoid maxillary junction. Due to the individual anatomy and the volume of the maxillary sinus, the implants presented a different positional relationship with the maxillary sinus. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:55:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7990d70e9b424da2991c557c2f5aca1e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2198-4034
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:55:20Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of Implant Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-7990d70e9b424da2991c557c2f5aca1e2023-04-03T05:28:27ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342023-03-01911910.1186/s40729-023-00472-4Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluationYuanyuan Sun0Chunfeng Xu1Ningtao Wang2Yiqun Wu3Yuelian Liu4Shengchi Fan5Feng Wang6Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of StomatologyDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of StomatologyDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of StomatologyDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of StomatologyAbstract Purpose The study aims to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to (1) define the virtual valid length of pterygoid implants in maxillary atrophic patients from the prosthetic prioritized driven position and (2) measure the implant length engaged in the pterygoid process according to the HU difference of the pterygoid maxillary junction. Materials and methods Virtual pterygoid implants were planned with CBCT of maxillary atrophic patients in the software. The entry and angulation of the implant were planned according to the prosthetic prioritized driven position in the 3D reconstruction image. The planned implant length and the valid length defined as the implant between the pterygoid maxillary junction and pterygoid fossa were recorded. The relationship between the implant and sinus cavity was also evaluated. Results A total of 120 CBCT samples were enrolled and virtually planned. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 ± 13.2 years. One hundred and sixteen samples could successfully place virtual implants according to the criterion. The mean implant length and mean implant length beyond the pterygoid maxillary junction were 16.3 ± 4.2 mm (range, 11.5–18 mm) and 7.1 ± 3.3 mm (range, 1.5–11.4 mm), respectively. Ninety percent of virtually planned implants had a close relationship with the sinus cavity, and implants exhibited longer lengths when they had no relation with the sinus. Conclusion From a prosthetic prioritized driven position with fixed entry and angulation, pterygoid implants achieve adequate bone anchorage length beyond the pterygoid maxillary junction. Due to the individual anatomy and the volume of the maxillary sinus, the implants presented a different positional relationship with the maxillary sinus. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00472-4Pterygoid implantCBCTAtrophic maxillaTilted implant
spellingShingle Yuanyuan Sun
Chunfeng Xu
Ningtao Wang
Yiqun Wu
Yuelian Liu
Shengchi Fan
Feng Wang
Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Pterygoid implant
CBCT
Atrophic maxilla
Tilted implant
title Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation
title_full Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation
title_fullStr Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation
title_short Virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients: prosthetic-driven planning and evaluation
title_sort virtual pterygoid implant planning in maxillary atrophic patients prosthetic driven planning and evaluation
topic Pterygoid implant
CBCT
Atrophic maxilla
Tilted implant
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00472-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanyuansun virtualpterygoidimplantplanninginmaxillaryatrophicpatientsprostheticdrivenplanningandevaluation
AT chunfengxu virtualpterygoidimplantplanninginmaxillaryatrophicpatientsprostheticdrivenplanningandevaluation
AT ningtaowang virtualpterygoidimplantplanninginmaxillaryatrophicpatientsprostheticdrivenplanningandevaluation
AT yiqunwu virtualpterygoidimplantplanninginmaxillaryatrophicpatientsprostheticdrivenplanningandevaluation
AT yuelianliu virtualpterygoidimplantplanninginmaxillaryatrophicpatientsprostheticdrivenplanningandevaluation
AT shengchifan virtualpterygoidimplantplanninginmaxillaryatrophicpatientsprostheticdrivenplanningandevaluation
AT fengwang virtualpterygoidimplantplanninginmaxillaryatrophicpatientsprostheticdrivenplanningandevaluation