Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism Model

Comparative studies of cultural-cognitive systems in China have stressed differences between northern and southern regions, with less attention paid to inter-regional commonality. This study proposes an implicit biculturalism model to rectify the diversity bias. The model posits that Chinese in both...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenli Liu, Zhaobin Dai, Shiwei Yang, Sik Hong Ng, Xiaocui Zhang, Shenli Peng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.731722/full
_version_ 1811255120219865088
author Wenli Liu
Zhaobin Dai
Shiwei Yang
Sik Hong Ng
Xiaocui Zhang
Xiaocui Zhang
Xiaocui Zhang
Shenli Peng
author_facet Wenli Liu
Zhaobin Dai
Shiwei Yang
Sik Hong Ng
Xiaocui Zhang
Xiaocui Zhang
Xiaocui Zhang
Shenli Peng
author_sort Wenli Liu
collection DOAJ
description Comparative studies of cultural-cognitive systems in China have stressed differences between northern and southern regions, with less attention paid to inter-regional commonality. This study proposes an implicit biculturalism model to rectify the diversity bias. The model posits that Chinese in both regions have internalized the same two cultural-cognitive systems but have organized them differently. For northerners, the individualist/analytical system (indicated by field-independence) is more dominant and chronically accessible than the collectivist/holistic system (indicated by field-dependence); for southerners the hierarchical order is reversed. The more dominant system would normally manifest in everyday life as the default situation, but the less dominant system could be activated through cultural priming. Both field-independent northerners (N = 46) and field-dependent southerners (N = 46) were assigned randomly into individualistic and collectivistic priming conditions and then tested with the Embedded Figure Test (EFT). The results indicated field-independent northern Chinese changed their EFT performance to be field-dependent under collectivism priming, and field-dependent southern Chinese changed their EFT performance in the field-independent direction, albeit to a less extent, under individualism priming. Generally, these results supported the implicit biculturalism model, which provides a more nuanced understanding of the question of “Who are the Chinese in Chinese psychology?”
first_indexed 2024-04-12T17:19:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-799323dda45145c89868c78b2c1e953c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T17:19:01Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-799323dda45145c89868c78b2c1e953c2022-12-22T03:23:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-05-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.731722731722Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism ModelWenli Liu0Zhaobin Dai1Shiwei Yang2Sik Hong Ng3Xiaocui Zhang4Xiaocui Zhang5Xiaocui Zhang6Shenli Peng7College of Education, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, ChinaCollege of Education, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, ChinaMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, ChinaMedical Psychological Institute of Central South University, Changsha, ChinaNational Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Changsha, ChinaCollege of Education, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, ChinaComparative studies of cultural-cognitive systems in China have stressed differences between northern and southern regions, with less attention paid to inter-regional commonality. This study proposes an implicit biculturalism model to rectify the diversity bias. The model posits that Chinese in both regions have internalized the same two cultural-cognitive systems but have organized them differently. For northerners, the individualist/analytical system (indicated by field-independence) is more dominant and chronically accessible than the collectivist/holistic system (indicated by field-dependence); for southerners the hierarchical order is reversed. The more dominant system would normally manifest in everyday life as the default situation, but the less dominant system could be activated through cultural priming. Both field-independent northerners (N = 46) and field-dependent southerners (N = 46) were assigned randomly into individualistic and collectivistic priming conditions and then tested with the Embedded Figure Test (EFT). The results indicated field-independent northern Chinese changed their EFT performance to be field-dependent under collectivism priming, and field-dependent southern Chinese changed their EFT performance in the field-independent direction, albeit to a less extent, under individualism priming. Generally, these results supported the implicit biculturalism model, which provides a more nuanced understanding of the question of “Who are the Chinese in Chinese psychology?”https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.731722/fullimplicit biculturalismculture primingculture mixingindividualist/analytical cultural-cognitive systemcollectivist/holistic cultural-cognitive system
spellingShingle Wenli Liu
Zhaobin Dai
Shiwei Yang
Sik Hong Ng
Xiaocui Zhang
Xiaocui Zhang
Xiaocui Zhang
Shenli Peng
Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism Model
Frontiers in Psychology
implicit biculturalism
culture priming
culture mixing
individualist/analytical cultural-cognitive system
collectivist/holistic cultural-cognitive system
title Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism Model
title_full Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism Model
title_fullStr Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism Model
title_full_unstemmed Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism Model
title_short Chinese Regional Differences and Commonality in Field-Independence and Field-Dependence: An Implicit Biculturalism Model
title_sort chinese regional differences and commonality in field independence and field dependence an implicit biculturalism model
topic implicit biculturalism
culture priming
culture mixing
individualist/analytical cultural-cognitive system
collectivist/holistic cultural-cognitive system
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.731722/full
work_keys_str_mv AT wenliliu chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel
AT zhaobindai chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel
AT shiweiyang chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel
AT sikhongng chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel
AT xiaocuizhang chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel
AT xiaocuizhang chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel
AT xiaocuizhang chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel
AT shenlipeng chineseregionaldifferencesandcommonalityinfieldindependenceandfielddependenceanimplicitbiculturalismmodel