Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access
Abstract Avisar et al. present an exemplary model for outreach aimed at ensuring that a maximum of patients eligible for expensive Hepatitis C (HPC) drugs receive treatment. We enlarge the picture to put their model in the political, economic and regulatory framework for financing and providing thes...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Israel Journal of Health Policy Research |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13584-017-0195-7 |
_version_ | 1819075434617241600 |
---|---|
author | Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot David Chinitz |
author_facet | Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot David Chinitz |
author_sort | Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Avisar et al. present an exemplary model for outreach aimed at ensuring that a maximum of patients eligible for expensive Hepatitis C (HPC) drugs receive treatment. We enlarge the picture to put their model in the political, economic and regulatory framework for financing and providing these drugs in Israel and a number of other countries. We then return to delivery system level and consider issues such as cost of outreach, the need for health care coordinators and dealing with Hepatitis C patients not yet entitled to receive the drugs under national health coverage determinations. Regarding national coverage decisions, we find that countries such as Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Israel all extended coverage for Hepatitis C drugs, given the clear high effectiveness of the latter. However, to limit budget impact, all these countries target coverage to patients based on disease genotype and stage. The model presented by Avisar et al., while impressive, leaves some items to address. These include: whether all resources allocated to HPC drugs are actually used for this purpose, the roles of outreach to HPC patients who do not meet the guidelines for treatment, and a comparison of the effectiveness of the model vs. a variety of costs associated with it. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T18:25:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-79a47dce87724ac588ddbf6efcd3285d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-4015 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T18:25:21Z |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Israel Journal of Health Policy Research |
spelling | doaj.art-79a47dce87724ac588ddbf6efcd3285d2022-12-21T18:54:26ZengBMCIsrael Journal of Health Policy Research2045-40152018-01-01711410.1186/s13584-017-0195-7Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing accessRachel Nissanholtz-Gannot0David Chinitz1Department of Health System Management, Ariel University, University HillDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Hebrew University-HadassahAbstract Avisar et al. present an exemplary model for outreach aimed at ensuring that a maximum of patients eligible for expensive Hepatitis C (HPC) drugs receive treatment. We enlarge the picture to put their model in the political, economic and regulatory framework for financing and providing these drugs in Israel and a number of other countries. We then return to delivery system level and consider issues such as cost of outreach, the need for health care coordinators and dealing with Hepatitis C patients not yet entitled to receive the drugs under national health coverage determinations. Regarding national coverage decisions, we find that countries such as Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Israel all extended coverage for Hepatitis C drugs, given the clear high effectiveness of the latter. However, to limit budget impact, all these countries target coverage to patients based on disease genotype and stage. The model presented by Avisar et al., while impressive, leaves some items to address. These include: whether all resources allocated to HPC drugs are actually used for this purpose, the roles of outreach to HPC patients who do not meet the guidelines for treatment, and a comparison of the effectiveness of the model vs. a variety of costs associated with it.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13584-017-0195-7 |
spellingShingle | Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot David Chinitz Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access Israel Journal of Health Policy Research |
title | Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access |
title_full | Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access |
title_fullStr | Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access |
title_full_unstemmed | Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access |
title_short | Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access |
title_sort | expensive lifesaving treatments allocating resources and maximizing access |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13584-017-0195-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rachelnissanholtzgannot expensivelifesavingtreatmentsallocatingresourcesandmaximizingaccess AT davidchinitz expensivelifesavingtreatmentsallocatingresourcesandmaximizingaccess |