In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow
This in-vitro study was designed to investigate whether conventionally produced casts and printed casts for orthodontic purposes show comparable full-arch accuracy. To produce casts, either a conventional impression or a digital data set is needed. A fully dentate all ceramic master cast was digitiz...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016668/?tool=EBI |
| _version_ | 1797867182515814400 |
|---|---|
| author | Sven Reich Hannah Herstell Stefan Raith Christina Kühne Saskia Berndt |
| author_facet | Sven Reich Hannah Herstell Stefan Raith Christina Kühne Saskia Berndt |
| author_sort | Sven Reich |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This in-vitro study was designed to investigate whether conventionally produced casts and printed casts for orthodontic purposes show comparable full-arch accuracy. To produce casts, either a conventional impression or a digital data set is needed. A fully dentate all ceramic master cast was digitized with an industrial scanner to obtain a digital reference cast [REF]. Intraoral scans [IOS] and alginate impressions were taken from the master cast so that ten printed and ten gypsum casts were obtained. The printed casts [DLP] were digitized by an industrial scanner and as well as the gypsum casts [GYPSUM]. The following absolute mean trueness evaluations by superimposition were accomplished: [REF vs. GYPSUM]; [REF vs. DLP]; [REF vs. IOS]; [IOS vs. DLP]. For precision analysis the data sets of [GYPSUM], [IOS] and [DLP] were available. The absolute mean trueness values were 68 μm ± 15 μm for [REF vs. GYPSUM], 46 μm ± 4 μm for [REF vs. DLP], 20 μm ± 2 μm for [REF vs. IOS] and 41 μm ± 4 μm for [IOS vs. DLP]. [REF vs. GYPSUM] and [REF vs. DLP], [REF vs. IOS], [REF vs. DLP] and [IOS vs. DLP] showed statistically significant differences. The precision values were 56 μm ± 17 μm for [GYPSUM], 25 μm ± 9 μm for [DLP] and 12 μm ± 2 μm for [IOS] and differed significantly among each other. In the present study the print workflow revealed superior results in comparison to the conventional workflow. Due to contrary deviations in the [REF vs. IOS] and the [IOS vs. DLP] data sets the overall trueness deviations was enhanced. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T23:37:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-79b1fd78bbc54638a37e69263f935532 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T23:37:18Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-79b1fd78bbc54638a37e69263f9355322023-03-20T05:31:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01183In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflowSven ReichHannah HerstellStefan RaithChristina KühneSaskia BerndtThis in-vitro study was designed to investigate whether conventionally produced casts and printed casts for orthodontic purposes show comparable full-arch accuracy. To produce casts, either a conventional impression or a digital data set is needed. A fully dentate all ceramic master cast was digitized with an industrial scanner to obtain a digital reference cast [REF]. Intraoral scans [IOS] and alginate impressions were taken from the master cast so that ten printed and ten gypsum casts were obtained. The printed casts [DLP] were digitized by an industrial scanner and as well as the gypsum casts [GYPSUM]. The following absolute mean trueness evaluations by superimposition were accomplished: [REF vs. GYPSUM]; [REF vs. DLP]; [REF vs. IOS]; [IOS vs. DLP]. For precision analysis the data sets of [GYPSUM], [IOS] and [DLP] were available. The absolute mean trueness values were 68 μm ± 15 μm for [REF vs. GYPSUM], 46 μm ± 4 μm for [REF vs. DLP], 20 μm ± 2 μm for [REF vs. IOS] and 41 μm ± 4 μm for [IOS vs. DLP]. [REF vs. GYPSUM] and [REF vs. DLP], [REF vs. IOS], [REF vs. DLP] and [IOS vs. DLP] showed statistically significant differences. The precision values were 56 μm ± 17 μm for [GYPSUM], 25 μm ± 9 μm for [DLP] and 12 μm ± 2 μm for [IOS] and differed significantly among each other. In the present study the print workflow revealed superior results in comparison to the conventional workflow. Due to contrary deviations in the [REF vs. IOS] and the [IOS vs. DLP] data sets the overall trueness deviations was enhanced.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016668/?tool=EBI |
| spellingShingle | Sven Reich Hannah Herstell Stefan Raith Christina Kühne Saskia Berndt In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow PLoS ONE |
| title | In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow |
| title_full | In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow |
| title_fullStr | In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow |
| title_full_unstemmed | In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow |
| title_short | In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow |
| title_sort | in vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016668/?tool=EBI |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT svenreich invitroaccuracyofcastsfororthodonticpurposesobtainedbyaconventionalandbyaprinterworkflow AT hannahherstell invitroaccuracyofcastsfororthodonticpurposesobtainedbyaconventionalandbyaprinterworkflow AT stefanraith invitroaccuracyofcastsfororthodonticpurposesobtainedbyaconventionalandbyaprinterworkflow AT christinakuhne invitroaccuracyofcastsfororthodonticpurposesobtainedbyaconventionalandbyaprinterworkflow AT saskiaberndt invitroaccuracyofcastsfororthodonticpurposesobtainedbyaconventionalandbyaprinterworkflow |