Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite Pavements

The study presented in this paper analyzed four long-term pavement performance (LTPP) test sections located in the states of New York (NY) and California (CA). Two of them are flexible pavement sections, whereas the other two are composite pavement sections. Two levels of analysis—in-state analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexa Raffaniello, Matthew Bauer, Md. Safiuddin, Mohab El-Hakim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Infrastructures
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/7/8/100
_version_ 1797409677829472256
author Alexa Raffaniello
Matthew Bauer
Md. Safiuddin
Mohab El-Hakim
author_facet Alexa Raffaniello
Matthew Bauer
Md. Safiuddin
Mohab El-Hakim
author_sort Alexa Raffaniello
collection DOAJ
description The study presented in this paper analyzed four long-term pavement performance (LTPP) test sections located in the states of New York (NY) and California (CA). Two of them are flexible pavement sections, whereas the other two are composite pavement sections. Two levels of analysis—in-state analysis and cross-state analysis—were performed for these pavement sections to determine the impacts of traffic and climate conditions. The performance of the pavement sections was evaluated in respect of thermal cracking and rutting resistance. The in-state analysis focused on comparing the pavement sections located in the same state. The two pavement sections located in CA exhibited insignificant variation in thermal cracking, although one of them had an additional 1.5” (38 mm) dense-graded asphaltic concrete (AC) layer. On the other hand, the additional 1.5” (38 mm) AC layer resulted in a significant reduction in the rutting depth in one pavement section. The in-state analysis of the two pavement sections located in NY revealed that the 0.8” (20.4 mm) chip seal layer had significantly low resistance to thermal cracking and rutting. The cross-state analysis examined pavement sections of comparable structural capacities—two with low structural capacity, and two with high structural capacity. The performance comparison of the two pavement sections with low structural capacity revealed that the chip seal layer exhibited a significantly high rutting depth, i.e., low rutting resistance under high traffic loads in a freezing climate. On the contrary, the two pavement sections with high structural capacity showed relatively high rutting resistance in both warmer and freezing climates. Furthermore, this paper presents the pavement deterioration models for rutting and thermal cracking in the LTPP test sections. These models were developed using multiple linear regression considering the pavement service life (age), traffic load (average annual daily truck traffic, AADTT), and climate impact (freezing index, FI). The deterioration models had coefficients of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) in the range of 0.82–0.99 and standard errors varying from 0.01 to 9.92, which indicate that the models are reliable.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T04:18:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79b2c9db2ce146289a04ef014d9b538e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2412-3811
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T04:18:03Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Infrastructures
spelling doaj.art-79b2c9db2ce146289a04ef014d9b538e2023-12-03T13:50:59ZengMDPI AGInfrastructures2412-38112022-07-017810010.3390/infrastructures7080100Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite PavementsAlexa Raffaniello0Matthew Bauer1Md. Safiuddin2Mohab El-Hakim3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Manhattan College, 4513 Manhattan College Parkway, Riverdale, NY 10471, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Manhattan College, 4513 Manhattan College Parkway, Riverdale, NY 10471, USAAngelo DelZotto School of Construction Management, Centre for Construction and Engineering Technologies, George Brown College, 160 Kendal Avenue, Toronto, ON M5R 1M3, CanadaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Manhattan College, 4513 Manhattan College Parkway, Riverdale, NY 10471, USAThe study presented in this paper analyzed four long-term pavement performance (LTPP) test sections located in the states of New York (NY) and California (CA). Two of them are flexible pavement sections, whereas the other two are composite pavement sections. Two levels of analysis—in-state analysis and cross-state analysis—were performed for these pavement sections to determine the impacts of traffic and climate conditions. The performance of the pavement sections was evaluated in respect of thermal cracking and rutting resistance. The in-state analysis focused on comparing the pavement sections located in the same state. The two pavement sections located in CA exhibited insignificant variation in thermal cracking, although one of them had an additional 1.5” (38 mm) dense-graded asphaltic concrete (AC) layer. On the other hand, the additional 1.5” (38 mm) AC layer resulted in a significant reduction in the rutting depth in one pavement section. The in-state analysis of the two pavement sections located in NY revealed that the 0.8” (20.4 mm) chip seal layer had significantly low resistance to thermal cracking and rutting. The cross-state analysis examined pavement sections of comparable structural capacities—two with low structural capacity, and two with high structural capacity. The performance comparison of the two pavement sections with low structural capacity revealed that the chip seal layer exhibited a significantly high rutting depth, i.e., low rutting resistance under high traffic loads in a freezing climate. On the contrary, the two pavement sections with high structural capacity showed relatively high rutting resistance in both warmer and freezing climates. Furthermore, this paper presents the pavement deterioration models for rutting and thermal cracking in the LTPP test sections. These models were developed using multiple linear regression considering the pavement service life (age), traffic load (average annual daily truck traffic, AADTT), and climate impact (freezing index, FI). The deterioration models had coefficients of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) in the range of 0.82–0.99 and standard errors varying from 0.01 to 9.92, which indicate that the models are reliable.https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/7/8/100climatecomposite pavementdeterioration modelsflexible pavementlong-term pavement performancerutting
spellingShingle Alexa Raffaniello
Matthew Bauer
Md. Safiuddin
Mohab El-Hakim
Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite Pavements
Infrastructures
climate
composite pavement
deterioration models
flexible pavement
long-term pavement performance
rutting
title Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite Pavements
title_full Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite Pavements
title_fullStr Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite Pavements
title_full_unstemmed Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite Pavements
title_short Traffic and Climate Impacts on Rutting and Thermal Cracking in Flexible and Composite Pavements
title_sort traffic and climate impacts on rutting and thermal cracking in flexible and composite pavements
topic climate
composite pavement
deterioration models
flexible pavement
long-term pavement performance
rutting
url https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/7/8/100
work_keys_str_mv AT alexaraffaniello trafficandclimateimpactsonruttingandthermalcrackinginflexibleandcompositepavements
AT matthewbauer trafficandclimateimpactsonruttingandthermalcrackinginflexibleandcompositepavements
AT mdsafiuddin trafficandclimateimpactsonruttingandthermalcrackinginflexibleandcompositepavements
AT mohabelhakim trafficandclimateimpactsonruttingandthermalcrackinginflexibleandcompositepavements