The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic Discourses

Digital forensic investigations are becoming increasingly crucial in criminal investigations and civil litigations, especially in cases of corporate espionage and intellectual property theft as more communication occurs online via e-mail and social media. Deceptive opinion spam analysis is an emergi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alibek Jakupov, Julien Longhi, Besma Zeddini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/1/10
_version_ 1827371639547887616
author Alibek Jakupov
Julien Longhi
Besma Zeddini
author_facet Alibek Jakupov
Julien Longhi
Besma Zeddini
author_sort Alibek Jakupov
collection DOAJ
description Digital forensic investigations are becoming increasingly crucial in criminal investigations and civil litigations, especially in cases of corporate espionage and intellectual property theft as more communication occurs online via e-mail and social media. Deceptive opinion spam analysis is an emerging field of research that aims to detect and identify fraudulent reviews, comments, and other forms of deceptive online content. In this paper, we explore how the findings from this field may be relevant to forensic investigation, particularly the features that capture stylistic patterns and sentiments, which are psychologically relevant aspects of truthful and deceptive language. To assess these features’ utility, we demonstrate the potential of our proposed approach using the real-world dataset from the Enron Email Corpus. Our findings suggest that deceptive opinion spam analysis may be a valuable tool for forensic investigators and legal professionals looking to identify and analyze deceptive behavior in online communication. By incorporating these techniques into their investigative and legal strategies, professionals can improve the accuracy and reliability of their findings, leading to more effective and just outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:44:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79b8eea9f32f4f75a34f6942da535989
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-471X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T10:44:25Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Languages
spelling doaj.art-79b8eea9f32f4f75a34f6942da5359892024-01-26T17:20:13ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2023-12-01911010.3390/languages9010010The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic DiscoursesAlibek Jakupov0Julien Longhi1Besma Zeddini2SATIE Laboratory CNRS–UMR 8029, CY Tech, CY Cergy Paris University, 95000 Cergy, FranceAGORA Laboratory EA 7392, CY Cergy Paris University, 95000 Cergy, FranceSATIE Laboratory CNRS–UMR 8029, CY Tech, CY Cergy Paris University, 95000 Cergy, FranceDigital forensic investigations are becoming increasingly crucial in criminal investigations and civil litigations, especially in cases of corporate espionage and intellectual property theft as more communication occurs online via e-mail and social media. Deceptive opinion spam analysis is an emerging field of research that aims to detect and identify fraudulent reviews, comments, and other forms of deceptive online content. In this paper, we explore how the findings from this field may be relevant to forensic investigation, particularly the features that capture stylistic patterns and sentiments, which are psychologically relevant aspects of truthful and deceptive language. To assess these features’ utility, we demonstrate the potential of our proposed approach using the real-world dataset from the Enron Email Corpus. Our findings suggest that deceptive opinion spam analysis may be a valuable tool for forensic investigators and legal professionals looking to identify and analyze deceptive behavior in online communication. By incorporating these techniques into their investigative and legal strategies, professionals can improve the accuracy and reliability of their findings, leading to more effective and just outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/1/10digital investigationNLP-based forensicsdeceptive opinion spamfeature engineeringstylometrysentiment analysis
spellingShingle Alibek Jakupov
Julien Longhi
Besma Zeddini
The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic Discourses
Languages
digital investigation
NLP-based forensics
deceptive opinion spam
feature engineering
stylometry
sentiment analysis
title The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic Discourses
title_full The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic Discourses
title_fullStr The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic Discourses
title_full_unstemmed The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic Discourses
title_short The Language of Deception: Applying Findings on Opinion Spam to Legal and Forensic Discourses
title_sort language of deception applying findings on opinion spam to legal and forensic discourses
topic digital investigation
NLP-based forensics
deceptive opinion spam
feature engineering
stylometry
sentiment analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/1/10
work_keys_str_mv AT alibekjakupov thelanguageofdeceptionapplyingfindingsonopinionspamtolegalandforensicdiscourses
AT julienlonghi thelanguageofdeceptionapplyingfindingsonopinionspamtolegalandforensicdiscourses
AT besmazeddini thelanguageofdeceptionapplyingfindingsonopinionspamtolegalandforensicdiscourses
AT alibekjakupov languageofdeceptionapplyingfindingsonopinionspamtolegalandforensicdiscourses
AT julienlonghi languageofdeceptionapplyingfindingsonopinionspamtolegalandforensicdiscourses
AT besmazeddini languageofdeceptionapplyingfindingsonopinionspamtolegalandforensicdiscourses