The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of Karlsruhe
<p>The Conseil d’Etat categorically rejected the proposal that the courts of the member states, in particular their supreme (or constitutional) courts, would be entitled to review an „ultra vires“ of the European institutions. The wording of the judgment is an implicit ackn...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-conseil-detat-refuses-to-follow-the-pied-piper-of-karlsruhe/ |
| _version_ | 1818511621312479232 |
|---|---|
| author | Jacques Ziller |
| author_facet | Jacques Ziller |
| author_sort | Jacques Ziller |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The Conseil d’Etat categorically rejected the proposal that the courts of the member states, in particular their supreme (or constitutional) courts, would be entitled to review an „ultra vires“ of the European institutions. The wording of the judgment is an implicit acknowledgement that there is a monopoly of the EU Court of Justice in the authentic interpretation of the Treaty – unlike the German Federal Constitutional Court in the Weiss case and the doctrine of constitutional identity and protection of national security. </p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T23:35:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-79bd7df3eb724cb29d721819acc483b7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T23:35:34Z |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-79bd7df3eb724cb29d721819acc483b72022-12-22T01:29:12ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of KarlsruheJacques Ziller<p>The Conseil d’Etat categorically rejected the proposal that the courts of the member states, in particular their supreme (or constitutional) courts, would be entitled to review an „ultra vires“ of the European institutions. The wording of the judgment is an implicit acknowledgement that there is a monopoly of the EU Court of Justice in the authentic interpretation of the Treaty – unlike the German Federal Constitutional Court in the Weiss case and the doctrine of constitutional identity and protection of national security. </p> https://verfassungsblog.de/the-conseil-detat-refuses-to-follow-the-pied-piper-of-karlsruhe/Conseil d'Etat, data protection, ECJ, PSPP, Ultra Vires |
| spellingShingle | Jacques Ziller The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of Karlsruhe Verfassungsblog Conseil d'Etat, data protection, ECJ, PSPP, Ultra Vires |
| title | The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of Karlsruhe |
| title_full | The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of Karlsruhe |
| title_fullStr | The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of Karlsruhe |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of Karlsruhe |
| title_short | The Conseil d’Etat refuses to follow the Pied Piper of Karlsruhe |
| title_sort | conseil d etat refuses to follow the pied piper of karlsruhe |
| topic | Conseil d'Etat, data protection, ECJ, PSPP, Ultra Vires |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-conseil-detat-refuses-to-follow-the-pied-piper-of-karlsruhe/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jacquesziller theconseildetatrefusestofollowthepiedpiperofkarlsruhe AT jacquesziller conseildetatrefusestofollowthepiedpiperofkarlsruhe |