Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient

Objective The aim of this study was to compare all-cause reoperation rates and costs in nonelderly patients treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with structural allograft versus synthetic cages for degenerative pathology. Methods We queried a private claims database to identif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Majd Marrache, Rachel Bronheim, Andrew B. Harris, Varun Puvanesarajah, Micheal Raad, Sang Lee, Richard Skolasky, Amit Jain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2020-12-01
Series:Neurospine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040216-108.pdf
_version_ 1797333425325080576
author Majd Marrache
Rachel Bronheim
Andrew B. Harris
Varun Puvanesarajah
Micheal Raad
Sang Lee
Richard Skolasky
Amit Jain
author_facet Majd Marrache
Rachel Bronheim
Andrew B. Harris
Varun Puvanesarajah
Micheal Raad
Sang Lee
Richard Skolasky
Amit Jain
author_sort Majd Marrache
collection DOAJ
description Objective The aim of this study was to compare all-cause reoperation rates and costs in nonelderly patients treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with structural allograft versus synthetic cages for degenerative pathology. Methods We queried a private claims database to identify adult patients (≤ 65 years) who underwent single-level ACDF in a hospital setting using either structural allograft or a synthetic cage (polyetheretherketone, metal, or hybrid device), from 2010 to 2016. The rate of all-cause reoperations at 2 years were compared between the 2 groups. Index hospitalization costs and 90-day complication rates were also compared. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results A total of 26,754 patients were included in the study. 11,514 patients (43%) underwent ACDF with structural allograft and 15,240 (57%) underwent ACDF with a synthetic cage. The patients in the allograft group were younger and more likely to be male. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to 90-day complications including: wound dehiscence, dysphagia, dysphonia, and hematoma/seroma. In the 2-year postoperative period, the synthetic cage group had a significantly higher rate of allcause reoperation compared to the allograft group (9.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.002). Index hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the synthetic cage group compared to those in the allograft group ($23,475 vs. $20,836, p < 0.001). Conclusion Structural allograft is associated with lower all-cause reoperation rates and lower index costs in nonelderly patients undergoing ACDF surgery for degenerative pathology. It is important to understand this data as we transition toward value-based care.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:03:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79beb1d078114f23b18a2e02d1d5514e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2586-6583
2586-6591
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:03:37Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format Article
series Neurospine
spelling doaj.art-79beb1d078114f23b18a2e02d1d5514e2024-02-02T11:41:05ZengKorean Spinal Neurosurgery SocietyNeurospine2586-65832586-65912020-12-0117489690110.14245/ns.2040216.1081093Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly PatientMajd Marrache0Rachel Bronheim1Andrew B. Harris2Varun Puvanesarajah3Micheal Raad4Sang Lee5Richard Skolasky6Amit Jain7 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USAObjective The aim of this study was to compare all-cause reoperation rates and costs in nonelderly patients treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with structural allograft versus synthetic cages for degenerative pathology. Methods We queried a private claims database to identify adult patients (≤ 65 years) who underwent single-level ACDF in a hospital setting using either structural allograft or a synthetic cage (polyetheretherketone, metal, or hybrid device), from 2010 to 2016. The rate of all-cause reoperations at 2 years were compared between the 2 groups. Index hospitalization costs and 90-day complication rates were also compared. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results A total of 26,754 patients were included in the study. 11,514 patients (43%) underwent ACDF with structural allograft and 15,240 (57%) underwent ACDF with a synthetic cage. The patients in the allograft group were younger and more likely to be male. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to 90-day complications including: wound dehiscence, dysphagia, dysphonia, and hematoma/seroma. In the 2-year postoperative period, the synthetic cage group had a significantly higher rate of allcause reoperation compared to the allograft group (9.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.002). Index hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the synthetic cage group compared to those in the allograft group ($23,475 vs. $20,836, p < 0.001). Conclusion Structural allograft is associated with lower all-cause reoperation rates and lower index costs in nonelderly patients undergoing ACDF surgery for degenerative pathology. It is important to understand this data as we transition toward value-based care.http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040216-108.pdfanterior cervical discectomy and fusionradiculopathyreoperationhospital costsallograftssynthetic cage
spellingShingle Majd Marrache
Rachel Bronheim
Andrew B. Harris
Varun Puvanesarajah
Micheal Raad
Sang Lee
Richard Skolasky
Amit Jain
Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
Neurospine
anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
radiculopathy
reoperation
hospital costs
allografts
synthetic cage
title Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
title_full Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
title_fullStr Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
title_full_unstemmed Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
title_short Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient
title_sort synthetic cages associated with increased rates of revision surgery and higher costs compared to allograft in acdf in the nonelderly patient
topic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
radiculopathy
reoperation
hospital costs
allografts
synthetic cage
url http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040216-108.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT majdmarrache syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient
AT rachelbronheim syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient
AT andrewbharris syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient
AT varunpuvanesarajah syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient
AT michealraad syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient
AT sanglee syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient
AT richardskolasky syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient
AT amitjain syntheticcagesassociatedwithincreasedratesofrevisionsurgeryandhighercostscomparedtoallograftinacdfinthenonelderlypatient