Upholding Judicial Independence through the Practice of Judicial Activism in Constitutional Review: A Study by Constitutional Judges
The practice of judicial activism, though not formally defined within the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court (MK), is implicitly recognized as an integral element of independent judicial power. The importance of this independence is underscored as a fundamental necessity for the preservation...
Main Authors: | Riris Ardhanariswari, Eko Nursetiawan, Syarafina Dyah Amalia, Enny Dwi Cahyani, Rozlinda Mohamed Fadzil |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Sharia UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Volksgeist |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/9565 |
Similar Items
-
Drama or Serenity? Upcoming Judicial Appointments at the Slovak Constitutional Court
by: Michal Ovádek -
Is there an institutional structure conducive to judicial independence? An overview of ruling constitutions in Latin America
by: Rebecca Magalhães, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Strength of Constitutional Court Decisions in Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia
by: Mexsasai Indra, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court
by: Simon Butt
Published: (2018-05-01) -
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
by: Radian Salman, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)