Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review

Background: Moral injury (MI) involves distress over having transgressed or violated core moral boundaries, accompanied by feelings of guilt, shame, self-condemnation, loss of trust, loss of meaning, and spiritual struggles. MI is often found in Veterans and Active Duty Military personnel with postt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harold G. Koenig, Nagy A. Youssef, Michelle Pearce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00443/full
_version_ 1818315672298455040
author Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig
Nagy A. Youssef
Michelle Pearce
author_facet Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig
Nagy A. Youssef
Michelle Pearce
author_sort Harold G. Koenig
collection DOAJ
description Background: Moral injury (MI) involves distress over having transgressed or violated core moral boundaries, accompanied by feelings of guilt, shame, self-condemnation, loss of trust, loss of meaning, and spiritual struggles. MI is often found in Veterans and Active Duty Military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MI is widespread among those with PTSD symptoms, adversely affects mental health, and may increase risk of suicide; however, MI is often ignored and neglected by mental health professionals who focus their attention on PTSD only.Methods: A review of the literature between 1980 and 2018 conducted in 2018 is presented here to identify scales used to assess MI. Databases used in this review were PsychInfo, PubMed (Medline), and Google Scholar. Search terms were “moral injury,” “measuring,” “screening,” “Veterans,” and “Active Duty Military.” Inclusion criteria were quantitative measurement of MI and health outcomes, Veteran or Active Duty Military status, and peer-review publication. Excluded were literature reviews, dissertations, book chapters, case reports, and qualitative studies.Results: Of the 730 studies identified, most did not meet eligibility criteria, leaving 118 full text articles that were reviewed, of which 42 did not meet eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 76 studies, 34 were duplicates leaving 42 studies, most published in 2013 or later. Of 22 studies that assessed MI, five used scales assessing multiple dimensions, and 17 assessed only one or two aspects (e.g., guilt, shame, or forgiveness). The remaining 20 studies used one of the scales reported in the first 22. Of the five scales assessing multiple dimensions of MI, two assess both morally injurious events and symptoms and the remaining three assess symptoms only. All studies were cross-sectional, except three that tested interventions.Conclusions: MI in the military setting is widespread and associated with PTSD symptom severity, anxiety, depression, and risk of suicide in current or former military personnel. Numerous measures exist to assess various dimensions of MI, including five multidimensional scales, although future research is needed to identify cutoff scores and clinically significant change scores. Three multidimensional measures assess MI symptoms alone (not events) and may be useful for determining if treatments directed at MI may both reduce symptoms and impact other mental health outcomes including PTSD.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:09:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79c491fdbf474a1b9e91221e75f54d68
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:09:15Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-79c491fdbf474a1b9e91221e75f54d682022-12-21T23:53:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402019-06-011010.3389/fpsyt.2019.00443384381Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A ReviewHarold G. Koenig0Harold G. Koenig1Harold G. Koenig2Nagy A. Youssef3Michelle Pearce4Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United StatesKing Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaNingxia Medical University, Yinchuan, ChinaMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, GA, United StatesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United StatesBackground: Moral injury (MI) involves distress over having transgressed or violated core moral boundaries, accompanied by feelings of guilt, shame, self-condemnation, loss of trust, loss of meaning, and spiritual struggles. MI is often found in Veterans and Active Duty Military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MI is widespread among those with PTSD symptoms, adversely affects mental health, and may increase risk of suicide; however, MI is often ignored and neglected by mental health professionals who focus their attention on PTSD only.Methods: A review of the literature between 1980 and 2018 conducted in 2018 is presented here to identify scales used to assess MI. Databases used in this review were PsychInfo, PubMed (Medline), and Google Scholar. Search terms were “moral injury,” “measuring,” “screening,” “Veterans,” and “Active Duty Military.” Inclusion criteria were quantitative measurement of MI and health outcomes, Veteran or Active Duty Military status, and peer-review publication. Excluded were literature reviews, dissertations, book chapters, case reports, and qualitative studies.Results: Of the 730 studies identified, most did not meet eligibility criteria, leaving 118 full text articles that were reviewed, of which 42 did not meet eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 76 studies, 34 were duplicates leaving 42 studies, most published in 2013 or later. Of 22 studies that assessed MI, five used scales assessing multiple dimensions, and 17 assessed only one or two aspects (e.g., guilt, shame, or forgiveness). The remaining 20 studies used one of the scales reported in the first 22. Of the five scales assessing multiple dimensions of MI, two assess both morally injurious events and symptoms and the remaining three assess symptoms only. All studies were cross-sectional, except three that tested interventions.Conclusions: MI in the military setting is widespread and associated with PTSD symptom severity, anxiety, depression, and risk of suicide in current or former military personnel. Numerous measures exist to assess various dimensions of MI, including five multidimensional scales, although future research is needed to identify cutoff scores and clinically significant change scores. Three multidimensional measures assess MI symptoms alone (not events) and may be useful for determining if treatments directed at MI may both reduce symptoms and impact other mental health outcomes including PTSD.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00443/fullmoral injuryinternal conflictposttraumatic stress disorderVeteransActive Duty Militaryscreening
spellingShingle Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig
Nagy A. Youssef
Michelle Pearce
Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review
Frontiers in Psychiatry
moral injury
internal conflict
posttraumatic stress disorder
Veterans
Active Duty Military
screening
title Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review
title_full Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review
title_fullStr Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review
title_short Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review
title_sort assessment of moral injury in veterans and active duty military personnel with ptsd a review
topic moral injury
internal conflict
posttraumatic stress disorder
Veterans
Active Duty Military
screening
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00443/full
work_keys_str_mv AT haroldgkoenig assessmentofmoralinjuryinveteransandactivedutymilitarypersonnelwithptsdareview
AT haroldgkoenig assessmentofmoralinjuryinveteransandactivedutymilitarypersonnelwithptsdareview
AT haroldgkoenig assessmentofmoralinjuryinveteransandactivedutymilitarypersonnelwithptsdareview
AT nagyayoussef assessmentofmoralinjuryinveteransandactivedutymilitarypersonnelwithptsdareview
AT michellepearce assessmentofmoralinjuryinveteransandactivedutymilitarypersonnelwithptsdareview