Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the stability and instrument-related complications associated with fixation of the lumbar spine using the Short-Rod (SR) technique.Methods: Using finite element analysis, this study assessed the stability of a bilateral lumbar fixation system when...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ze-Bin Huang, Mao-Dan Nie, Ning-Ze Zhang, Shu Liu, Jia-Bin Yuan, Xu-Miao Lin, Cheng-Kung Cheng, Zhi-Cai Shi, Ning-Fang Mao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.959210/full
_version_ 1811322045239132160
author Ze-Bin Huang
Mao-Dan Nie
Ning-Ze Zhang
Shu Liu
Jia-Bin Yuan
Xu-Miao Lin
Cheng-Kung Cheng
Zhi-Cai Shi
Ning-Fang Mao
author_facet Ze-Bin Huang
Mao-Dan Nie
Ning-Ze Zhang
Shu Liu
Jia-Bin Yuan
Xu-Miao Lin
Cheng-Kung Cheng
Zhi-Cai Shi
Ning-Fang Mao
author_sort Ze-Bin Huang
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the stability and instrument-related complications associated with fixation of the lumbar spine using the Short-Rod (SR) technique.Methods: Using finite element analysis, this study assessed the stability of a bilateral lumbar fixation system when inserting the pedicle screws at angles of 10°, 15°, and 20° to the endplate in the sagittal plane. Using the most stable construct with a screw angle, the model was then assessed with different rod lengths of 25, 30, 35, and 45 mm. The optimal screw inclination angle and rod length were incorporated into the SR model and compared against traditional parallel screw insertion (pedicle screws in parallel to the endplate, PPS) in terms of the stability and risk of instrument-related complications. The following parameters were evaluated using the validated L4–L5 lumbar finite element model: axial stiffness, range of motion (ROM), stress on the endplate and facet joint, von-Mises stress on the contact surface between the screw and rod (CSSR), and screw displacement.Results: The results showed that the SR model with a 15° screw inclination angle and 35 mm rod length was superior in terms of construct stability and risk of complications. Compared to the PPS model, the SR model had lower stiffness, lower ROM, less screw displacement, and lower stress on the facet cartilage, the CSSR, and screws. However, the SR model also suffered more stress on the endplate in flexion and lateral bending.Conclusion: The SR technique with a 15° screw inclination and 35 mm rod length offers good lumbar stability with a low risk of instrument-related complications.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:28:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79cdb8d7ed194736b8cfd5750841b5f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-4185
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:28:18Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-79cdb8d7ed194736b8cfd5750841b5f12022-12-22T02:45:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852022-08-011010.3389/fbioe.2022.959210959210Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgeryZe-Bin Huang0Mao-Dan Nie1Ning-Ze Zhang2Shu Liu3Jia-Bin Yuan4Xu-Miao Lin5Cheng-Kung Cheng6Zhi-Cai Shi7Ning-Fang Mao8Department of Spine Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaKey Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Spine Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, ChinaObjective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the stability and instrument-related complications associated with fixation of the lumbar spine using the Short-Rod (SR) technique.Methods: Using finite element analysis, this study assessed the stability of a bilateral lumbar fixation system when inserting the pedicle screws at angles of 10°, 15°, and 20° to the endplate in the sagittal plane. Using the most stable construct with a screw angle, the model was then assessed with different rod lengths of 25, 30, 35, and 45 mm. The optimal screw inclination angle and rod length were incorporated into the SR model and compared against traditional parallel screw insertion (pedicle screws in parallel to the endplate, PPS) in terms of the stability and risk of instrument-related complications. The following parameters were evaluated using the validated L4–L5 lumbar finite element model: axial stiffness, range of motion (ROM), stress on the endplate and facet joint, von-Mises stress on the contact surface between the screw and rod (CSSR), and screw displacement.Results: The results showed that the SR model with a 15° screw inclination angle and 35 mm rod length was superior in terms of construct stability and risk of complications. Compared to the PPS model, the SR model had lower stiffness, lower ROM, less screw displacement, and lower stress on the facet cartilage, the CSSR, and screws. However, the SR model also suffered more stress on the endplate in flexion and lateral bending.Conclusion: The SR technique with a 15° screw inclination and 35 mm rod length offers good lumbar stability with a low risk of instrument-related complications.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.959210/fullimplantation techniqueshort-rod techniquepedicle screwscrew inclination anglerod lengthbiomechanical evaluation
spellingShingle Ze-Bin Huang
Mao-Dan Nie
Ning-Ze Zhang
Shu Liu
Jia-Bin Yuan
Xu-Miao Lin
Cheng-Kung Cheng
Zhi-Cai Shi
Ning-Fang Mao
Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
implantation technique
short-rod technique
pedicle screw
screw inclination angle
rod length
biomechanical evaluation
title Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of a short-rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of a short rod technique for lumbar fixation surgery
topic implantation technique
short-rod technique
pedicle screw
screw inclination angle
rod length
biomechanical evaluation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.959210/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zebinhuang biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT maodannie biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT ningzezhang biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT shuliu biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT jiabinyuan biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT xumiaolin biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT chengkungcheng biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT zhicaishi biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery
AT ningfangmao biomechanicalevaluationofashortrodtechniqueforlumbarfixationsurgery