Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.

Anaemia among men is a significant health issue which has not been given due importance. Only a handful of studies have captured the prevalence of anaemia among men. There is dearth of evidence base on anaemia among men in India. Therefore, this study attempts to fill this research gap by examining...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aditya Singh, Sumit Ram, Shivani Singh, Pooja Tripathi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLOS Global Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001159
_version_ 1797695635079561216
author Aditya Singh
Sumit Ram
Shivani Singh
Pooja Tripathi
author_facet Aditya Singh
Sumit Ram
Shivani Singh
Pooja Tripathi
author_sort Aditya Singh
collection DOAJ
description Anaemia among men is a significant health issue which has not been given due importance. Only a handful of studies have captured the prevalence of anaemia among men. There is dearth of evidence base on anaemia among men in India. Therefore, this study attempts to fill this research gap by examining the socioeconomic, geographic, health-related, and behavioural differentials of anaemia among rural men in India. We analysed a cross-sectional sample of 61,481 men aged between 15-54 and living in rural areas from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), conducted in 2019-21. Bivariate statistics and multivariable logistic regression were employed to assess the factors associated with anaemia. In rural India, three out of ten men were found to be anaemic. Older men [49-54 years] (Odds Ratio: 1.10, 95% CI, 1.00-1.21), men without a formal education (OR: 1.36, 95% CI, 1.26-1.47), those from Scheduled Tribes (OR: 1.48, 95% CI, 1.39-1.58) and men who belonged to the poorest wealth quintile (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.25-1.35) had a higher risk of anaemia. Men who were underweight were more likely to be anaemic (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.30-1.43). When compared to the central region, men from the eastern (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.39-1.55) parts of India had higher a risk of anaemia. The findings suggest the need to recognise anaemia among men as a public health issue. When developing policy, significant variation in socioeconomic, geographic, health-related, and behavioural factors must be taken into account. Men should also be screened on a regular basis in order to reduce the national burden of anaemia.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:14:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79d5d420d0b14847ab04bffe6080c618
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2767-3375
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:14:13Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLOS Global Public Health
spelling doaj.art-79d5d420d0b14847ab04bffe6080c6182023-09-03T14:12:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLOS Global Public Health2767-33752022-01-01212e000115910.1371/journal.pgph.0001159Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.Aditya SinghSumit RamShivani SinghPooja TripathiAnaemia among men is a significant health issue which has not been given due importance. Only a handful of studies have captured the prevalence of anaemia among men. There is dearth of evidence base on anaemia among men in India. Therefore, this study attempts to fill this research gap by examining the socioeconomic, geographic, health-related, and behavioural differentials of anaemia among rural men in India. We analysed a cross-sectional sample of 61,481 men aged between 15-54 and living in rural areas from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), conducted in 2019-21. Bivariate statistics and multivariable logistic regression were employed to assess the factors associated with anaemia. In rural India, three out of ten men were found to be anaemic. Older men [49-54 years] (Odds Ratio: 1.10, 95% CI, 1.00-1.21), men without a formal education (OR: 1.36, 95% CI, 1.26-1.47), those from Scheduled Tribes (OR: 1.48, 95% CI, 1.39-1.58) and men who belonged to the poorest wealth quintile (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.25-1.35) had a higher risk of anaemia. Men who were underweight were more likely to be anaemic (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.30-1.43). When compared to the central region, men from the eastern (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.39-1.55) parts of India had higher a risk of anaemia. The findings suggest the need to recognise anaemia among men as a public health issue. When developing policy, significant variation in socioeconomic, geographic, health-related, and behavioural factors must be taken into account. Men should also be screened on a regular basis in order to reduce the national burden of anaemia.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001159
spellingShingle Aditya Singh
Sumit Ram
Shivani Singh
Pooja Tripathi
Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.
PLOS Global Public Health
title Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.
title_full Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.
title_fullStr Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.
title_short Prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural India: Evidence from a nationally representative survey.
title_sort prevalence and determinants of anaemia among men in rural india evidence from a nationally representative survey
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001159
work_keys_str_mv AT adityasingh prevalenceanddeterminantsofanaemiaamongmeninruralindiaevidencefromanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT sumitram prevalenceanddeterminantsofanaemiaamongmeninruralindiaevidencefromanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT shivanisingh prevalenceanddeterminantsofanaemiaamongmeninruralindiaevidencefromanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT poojatripathi prevalenceanddeterminantsofanaemiaamongmeninruralindiaevidencefromanationallyrepresentativesurvey