Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary

Land-use planning (LUP), an instrument of land governance, is often employed to protect land and humans against natural and human-induced hazards, strengthen the resilience of land systems, and secure their sustainability. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) underlines th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Helen Briassoulis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/2/27
_version_ 1831636034368045056
author Helen Briassoulis
author_facet Helen Briassoulis
author_sort Helen Briassoulis
collection DOAJ
description Land-use planning (LUP), an instrument of land governance, is often employed to protect land and humans against natural and human-induced hazards, strengthen the resilience of land systems, and secure their sustainability. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) underlines the critical role of appropriate local action to address the global threat of land degradation and desertification (LDD) and calls for the use of local and regional LUP to combat LDD and achieve land degradation neutrality. The paper explores the challenges of putting this call into practice. After presenting desertification and the pertinent institutional context, the paper examines whether and how LDD concerns enter the stages of the LUP process and the issues arising at each stage. LDD problem complexity, the prevailing mode of governance, and the planning style endorsed, combined with LDD awareness, knowledge and perception, value priorities, geographic particularities and historical circumstances, underlie the main challenges confronting LUP; namely, adequate representation of LDD at each stage of LUP, conflict resolution between LDD-related and development goals, need for cooperation, collaboration and coordination of numerous and diverse actors, sectors, institutions and policy domains from multiple spatial/organizational levels and uncertainty regarding present and future environmental and socio-economic change. In order to realize the integrative potential of LUP and foster its effectiveness in combating LDD at the local and regional levels, the provision of an enabling, higher-level institutional environment should be prioritized to support phrοnetic-strategic integrated LUP at lower levels, which future research should explore theoretically, methodologically and empirically.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T06:25:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79d63e033d114f15bc0c63d8c1541899
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T06:25:58Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-79d63e033d114f15bc0c63d8c15418992022-12-21T20:32:34ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2019-02-01822710.3390/land8020027land8020027Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning QuandaryHelen Briassoulis0Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, 81100 Lesvos, GreeceLand-use planning (LUP), an instrument of land governance, is often employed to protect land and humans against natural and human-induced hazards, strengthen the resilience of land systems, and secure their sustainability. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) underlines the critical role of appropriate local action to address the global threat of land degradation and desertification (LDD) and calls for the use of local and regional LUP to combat LDD and achieve land degradation neutrality. The paper explores the challenges of putting this call into practice. After presenting desertification and the pertinent institutional context, the paper examines whether and how LDD concerns enter the stages of the LUP process and the issues arising at each stage. LDD problem complexity, the prevailing mode of governance, and the planning style endorsed, combined with LDD awareness, knowledge and perception, value priorities, geographic particularities and historical circumstances, underlie the main challenges confronting LUP; namely, adequate representation of LDD at each stage of LUP, conflict resolution between LDD-related and development goals, need for cooperation, collaboration and coordination of numerous and diverse actors, sectors, institutions and policy domains from multiple spatial/organizational levels and uncertainty regarding present and future environmental and socio-economic change. In order to realize the integrative potential of LUP and foster its effectiveness in combating LDD at the local and regional levels, the provision of an enabling, higher-level institutional environment should be prioritized to support phrοnetic-strategic integrated LUP at lower levels, which future research should explore theoretically, methodologically and empirically.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/2/27Integrated land-use planningland degradationdesertificationpolicyphronetic approach
spellingShingle Helen Briassoulis
Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary
Land
Integrated land-use planning
land degradation
desertification
policy
phronetic approach
title Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary
title_full Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary
title_fullStr Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary
title_full_unstemmed Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary
title_short Combating Land Degradation and Desertification: The Land-Use Planning Quandary
title_sort combating land degradation and desertification the land use planning quandary
topic Integrated land-use planning
land degradation
desertification
policy
phronetic approach
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/2/27
work_keys_str_mv AT helenbriassoulis combatinglanddegradationanddesertificationthelanduseplanningquandary