The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although numerous efficacy studies in recent years have found internet-based interventions for depression to be effective, there has been scant consideration of therapeutic process factors in the online setting. In face-to face thera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Preschl Barbara, Maercker Andreas, Wagner Birgit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-12-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/11/189
_version_ 1818085771108679680
author Preschl Barbara
Maercker Andreas
Wagner Birgit
author_facet Preschl Barbara
Maercker Andreas
Wagner Birgit
author_sort Preschl Barbara
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although numerous efficacy studies in recent years have found internet-based interventions for depression to be effective, there has been scant consideration of therapeutic process factors in the online setting. In face-to face therapy, the quality of the working alliance explains variance in treatment outcome. However, little is yet known about the impact of the working alliance in internet-based interventions, particularly as compared with face-to-face therapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study explored the working alliance between client and therapist in the middle and at the end of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression. The participants were randomized to an internet-based treatment group (n = 25) or face-to-face group (n = 28). Both groups received the same cognitive behavioral therapy over an 8-week timeframe. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) post-treatment and the Working Alliance Inventory at mid- and post- treatment. Therapists completed the therapist version of the Working Alliance Inventory at post-treatment.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>With the exception of therapists' ratings of the tasks subscale, which were significantly higher in the online group, the two groups' ratings of the working alliance did not differ significantly. Further, significant correlations were found between clients' ratings of the working alliance and therapy outcome at post-treatment in the online group and at both mid- and post-treatment in the face-to-face group. Correlation analysis revealed that the working alliance ratings did not significantly predict the BDI residual gain score in either group.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Contrary to what might have been expected, the working alliance in the online group was comparable to that in the face-to-face group. However, the results showed no significant relations between the BDI residual gain score and the working alliance ratings in either group.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p><a href="http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12611000563965.aspx">ACTRN12611000563965</a></p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:15:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79ebf5d5c0d24ac3a56434af8b19dd09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-244X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:15:04Z
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-79ebf5d5c0d24ac3a56434af8b19dd092022-12-22T01:35:13ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2011-12-0111118910.1186/1471-244X-11-189The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depressionPreschl BarbaraMaercker AndreasWagner Birgit<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although numerous efficacy studies in recent years have found internet-based interventions for depression to be effective, there has been scant consideration of therapeutic process factors in the online setting. In face-to face therapy, the quality of the working alliance explains variance in treatment outcome. However, little is yet known about the impact of the working alliance in internet-based interventions, particularly as compared with face-to-face therapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study explored the working alliance between client and therapist in the middle and at the end of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression. The participants were randomized to an internet-based treatment group (n = 25) or face-to-face group (n = 28). Both groups received the same cognitive behavioral therapy over an 8-week timeframe. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) post-treatment and the Working Alliance Inventory at mid- and post- treatment. Therapists completed the therapist version of the Working Alliance Inventory at post-treatment.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>With the exception of therapists' ratings of the tasks subscale, which were significantly higher in the online group, the two groups' ratings of the working alliance did not differ significantly. Further, significant correlations were found between clients' ratings of the working alliance and therapy outcome at post-treatment in the online group and at both mid- and post-treatment in the face-to-face group. Correlation analysis revealed that the working alliance ratings did not significantly predict the BDI residual gain score in either group.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Contrary to what might have been expected, the working alliance in the online group was comparable to that in the face-to-face group. However, the results showed no significant relations between the BDI residual gain score and the working alliance ratings in either group.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p><a href="http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12611000563965.aspx">ACTRN12611000563965</a></p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/11/189
spellingShingle Preschl Barbara
Maercker Andreas
Wagner Birgit
The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
BMC Psychiatry
title The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_full The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_fullStr The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_full_unstemmed The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_short The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_sort working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face to face cognitive behavioral therapy for depression
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/11/189
work_keys_str_mv AT preschlbarbara theworkingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT maerckerandreas theworkingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT wagnerbirgit theworkingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT preschlbarbara workingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT maerckerandreas workingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT wagnerbirgit workingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression