Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers

Alberta Clippers (clippers) have long been associated with lake-effect snow (LES) events due to their frequent passage over the Great Lakes basin. However, not all clippers produce LES, and no research has inquired into which synoptic fields most influence LES formation. This study analyzes clippers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jake Wiley, Andrew Mercer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1288
_version_ 1797515362504278016
author Jake Wiley
Andrew Mercer
author_facet Jake Wiley
Andrew Mercer
author_sort Jake Wiley
collection DOAJ
description Alberta Clippers (clippers) have long been associated with lake-effect snow (LES) events due to their frequent passage over the Great Lakes basin. However, not all clippers produce LES, and no research has inquired into which synoptic fields most influence LES formation. This study analyzes clippers during non-LES situations to further knowledge on which atmospheric variables most regulate LES development on the synoptic scale. As no such database currently exists, a clipper repository is developed using National Centers for Environmental Prediction Reanalysis data. The repository is then cross referenced with a previously developed LES repository to identify clippers responsible for LES. Composite synoptic-scale patterns were then constructed on the remaining non-LES clippers to identify synoptic conditions that ultimately inhibited LES formation. This analysis is supplemented by an assessment of lake surface conditions in each composite to evaluate how influential the lake characteristics were in the suppression of LES activity. In total, 51 non-LES clippers were identified, tracked, and separated into three composite map types that exhibited unique storm track and spatial characteristics. Permutation testing revealed that lake surface conditions were not significantly (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) different between LES and non-LES associated clippers implying the main LES inhibition factors were meteorological.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:44:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79fda9aef8d347e3a01f79ac589347a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:44:25Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-79fda9aef8d347e3a01f79ac589347a82023-11-22T17:25:13ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-10-011210128810.3390/atmos12101288Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta ClippersJake Wiley0Andrew Mercer1Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 75 B. S. Hood Road, Starkville, MS 39762, USADepartment of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 75 B. S. Hood Road, Starkville, MS 39762, USAAlberta Clippers (clippers) have long been associated with lake-effect snow (LES) events due to their frequent passage over the Great Lakes basin. However, not all clippers produce LES, and no research has inquired into which synoptic fields most influence LES formation. This study analyzes clippers during non-LES situations to further knowledge on which atmospheric variables most regulate LES development on the synoptic scale. As no such database currently exists, a clipper repository is developed using National Centers for Environmental Prediction Reanalysis data. The repository is then cross referenced with a previously developed LES repository to identify clippers responsible for LES. Composite synoptic-scale patterns were then constructed on the remaining non-LES clippers to identify synoptic conditions that ultimately inhibited LES formation. This analysis is supplemented by an assessment of lake surface conditions in each composite to evaluate how influential the lake characteristics were in the suppression of LES activity. In total, 51 non-LES clippers were identified, tracked, and separated into three composite map types that exhibited unique storm track and spatial characteristics. Permutation testing revealed that lake surface conditions were not significantly (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) different between LES and non-LES associated clippers implying the main LES inhibition factors were meteorological.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1288lake-effect snowmid-latitude cyclonessynopticGreat LakesAlberta Clipperwinter weather
spellingShingle Jake Wiley
Andrew Mercer
Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers
Atmosphere
lake-effect snow
mid-latitude cyclones
synoptic
Great Lakes
Alberta Clipper
winter weather
title Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers
title_full Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers
title_fullStr Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers
title_full_unstemmed Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers
title_short Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers
title_sort structure and evolution of non lake effect snow producing alberta clippers
topic lake-effect snow
mid-latitude cyclones
synoptic
Great Lakes
Alberta Clipper
winter weather
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1288
work_keys_str_mv AT jakewiley structureandevolutionofnonlakeeffectsnowproducingalbertaclippers
AT andrewmercer structureandevolutionofnonlakeeffectsnowproducingalbertaclippers