Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers
Alberta Clippers (clippers) have long been associated with lake-effect snow (LES) events due to their frequent passage over the Great Lakes basin. However, not all clippers produce LES, and no research has inquired into which synoptic fields most influence LES formation. This study analyzes clippers...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Atmosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1288 |
_version_ | 1797515362504278016 |
---|---|
author | Jake Wiley Andrew Mercer |
author_facet | Jake Wiley Andrew Mercer |
author_sort | Jake Wiley |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Alberta Clippers (clippers) have long been associated with lake-effect snow (LES) events due to their frequent passage over the Great Lakes basin. However, not all clippers produce LES, and no research has inquired into which synoptic fields most influence LES formation. This study analyzes clippers during non-LES situations to further knowledge on which atmospheric variables most regulate LES development on the synoptic scale. As no such database currently exists, a clipper repository is developed using National Centers for Environmental Prediction Reanalysis data. The repository is then cross referenced with a previously developed LES repository to identify clippers responsible for LES. Composite synoptic-scale patterns were then constructed on the remaining non-LES clippers to identify synoptic conditions that ultimately inhibited LES formation. This analysis is supplemented by an assessment of lake surface conditions in each composite to evaluate how influential the lake characteristics were in the suppression of LES activity. In total, 51 non-LES clippers were identified, tracked, and separated into three composite map types that exhibited unique storm track and spatial characteristics. Permutation testing revealed that lake surface conditions were not significantly (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) different between LES and non-LES associated clippers implying the main LES inhibition factors were meteorological. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:44:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-79fda9aef8d347e3a01f79ac589347a8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-4433 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T06:44:25Z |
publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Atmosphere |
spelling | doaj.art-79fda9aef8d347e3a01f79ac589347a82023-11-22T17:25:13ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-10-011210128810.3390/atmos12101288Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta ClippersJake Wiley0Andrew Mercer1Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 75 B. S. Hood Road, Starkville, MS 39762, USADepartment of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 75 B. S. Hood Road, Starkville, MS 39762, USAAlberta Clippers (clippers) have long been associated with lake-effect snow (LES) events due to their frequent passage over the Great Lakes basin. However, not all clippers produce LES, and no research has inquired into which synoptic fields most influence LES formation. This study analyzes clippers during non-LES situations to further knowledge on which atmospheric variables most regulate LES development on the synoptic scale. As no such database currently exists, a clipper repository is developed using National Centers for Environmental Prediction Reanalysis data. The repository is then cross referenced with a previously developed LES repository to identify clippers responsible for LES. Composite synoptic-scale patterns were then constructed on the remaining non-LES clippers to identify synoptic conditions that ultimately inhibited LES formation. This analysis is supplemented by an assessment of lake surface conditions in each composite to evaluate how influential the lake characteristics were in the suppression of LES activity. In total, 51 non-LES clippers were identified, tracked, and separated into three composite map types that exhibited unique storm track and spatial characteristics. Permutation testing revealed that lake surface conditions were not significantly (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) different between LES and non-LES associated clippers implying the main LES inhibition factors were meteorological.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1288lake-effect snowmid-latitude cyclonessynopticGreat LakesAlberta Clipperwinter weather |
spellingShingle | Jake Wiley Andrew Mercer Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers Atmosphere lake-effect snow mid-latitude cyclones synoptic Great Lakes Alberta Clipper winter weather |
title | Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers |
title_full | Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers |
title_fullStr | Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers |
title_full_unstemmed | Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers |
title_short | Structure and Evolution of Non-Lake-Effect Snow Producing Alberta Clippers |
title_sort | structure and evolution of non lake effect snow producing alberta clippers |
topic | lake-effect snow mid-latitude cyclones synoptic Great Lakes Alberta Clipper winter weather |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/10/1288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jakewiley structureandevolutionofnonlakeeffectsnowproducingalbertaclippers AT andrewmercer structureandevolutionofnonlakeeffectsnowproducingalbertaclippers |