Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section

Background: The evolution of sonohysterography (SHG) over the past years has contributed significantly to the assessment of uterine cavity. Objectives: To compare SHG versus the “gold standard” diagnostic hysteroscopy (DH) for the assessment of the uterine cavity in women with previous cesarean sect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akmal El-Mazny, Nermeen Abou-Salem, Waleed El-Khayat, Adel Farouk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2011-03-01
Series:Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569010001445
_version_ 1818953564571041792
author Akmal El-Mazny
Nermeen Abou-Salem
Waleed El-Khayat
Adel Farouk
author_facet Akmal El-Mazny
Nermeen Abou-Salem
Waleed El-Khayat
Adel Farouk
author_sort Akmal El-Mazny
collection DOAJ
description Background: The evolution of sonohysterography (SHG) over the past years has contributed significantly to the assessment of uterine cavity. Objectives: To compare SHG versus the “gold standard” diagnostic hysteroscopy (DH) for the assessment of the uterine cavity in women with previous cesarean section (CS). Design: Comparative observational cross-sectional study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr El-Aini Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. Subjects: Seventy-five women with previous CS(s), complaining of infertility, menstrual disorders or recurrent pregnancy loss. The inclusion criteria were: age between 20 and 35years; previous 1–3 CS(s); and the duration from the last CS ranging from 1 to 5years. Methods: Transvaginal SHG with saline infusion as contrast medium for assessment of the thickness of the scar, filling defect in the scar (niche) and intrauterine adhesions. DH was performed to confirm different findings. Main outcome measures: The findings at SHG were compared to DH; and the accuracy of SHG was calculated. Results: The scar thickness at SHG was significantly lower in cases with scar defect at DH (P=0.016). SHG was comparable to DH as shown by sensitivity, specificity, +ve predictive value, −ve predictive value and overall accuracy of 87%, 100%, 100%, 95% and 96%, respectively, in the diagnosis of scar defect; and 76%, 100%, 100%, 87% and 91%, respectively, in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions. Conclusion: SHG is reliable and feasible, and may be recommended as an alternative to DH for the assessment of the uterine cavity and uterine scar in women with previous CS.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T10:08:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a0875670b8c42c0bfcf63008639e442
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-5690
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T10:08:17Z
publishDate 2011-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Middle East Fertility Society Journal
spelling doaj.art-7a0875670b8c42c0bfcf63008639e4422022-12-21T19:44:12ZengSpringerOpenMiddle East Fertility Society Journal1110-56902011-03-01161727610.1016/j.mefs.2010.07.015Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean sectionAkmal El-MaznyNermeen Abou-SalemWaleed El-KhayatAdel FaroukBackground: The evolution of sonohysterography (SHG) over the past years has contributed significantly to the assessment of uterine cavity. Objectives: To compare SHG versus the “gold standard” diagnostic hysteroscopy (DH) for the assessment of the uterine cavity in women with previous cesarean section (CS). Design: Comparative observational cross-sectional study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr El-Aini Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. Subjects: Seventy-five women with previous CS(s), complaining of infertility, menstrual disorders or recurrent pregnancy loss. The inclusion criteria were: age between 20 and 35years; previous 1–3 CS(s); and the duration from the last CS ranging from 1 to 5years. Methods: Transvaginal SHG with saline infusion as contrast medium for assessment of the thickness of the scar, filling defect in the scar (niche) and intrauterine adhesions. DH was performed to confirm different findings. Main outcome measures: The findings at SHG were compared to DH; and the accuracy of SHG was calculated. Results: The scar thickness at SHG was significantly lower in cases with scar defect at DH (P=0.016). SHG was comparable to DH as shown by sensitivity, specificity, +ve predictive value, −ve predictive value and overall accuracy of 87%, 100%, 100%, 95% and 96%, respectively, in the diagnosis of scar defect; and 76%, 100%, 100%, 87% and 91%, respectively, in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions. Conclusion: SHG is reliable and feasible, and may be recommended as an alternative to DH for the assessment of the uterine cavity and uterine scar in women with previous CS.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569010001445SonohysterographyHysteroscopyUterine cavityCesarean section
spellingShingle Akmal El-Mazny
Nermeen Abou-Salem
Waleed El-Khayat
Adel Farouk
Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Sonohysterography
Hysteroscopy
Uterine cavity
Cesarean section
title Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section
title_full Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section
title_fullStr Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section
title_short Diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section
title_sort diagnostic correlation between sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the assessment of uterine cavity after cesarean section
topic Sonohysterography
Hysteroscopy
Uterine cavity
Cesarean section
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569010001445
work_keys_str_mv AT akmalelmazny diagnosticcorrelationbetweensonohysterographyandhysteroscopyintheassessmentofuterinecavityaftercesareansection
AT nermeenabousalem diagnosticcorrelationbetweensonohysterographyandhysteroscopyintheassessmentofuterinecavityaftercesareansection
AT waleedelkhayat diagnosticcorrelationbetweensonohysterographyandhysteroscopyintheassessmentofuterinecavityaftercesareansection
AT adelfarouk diagnosticcorrelationbetweensonohysterographyandhysteroscopyintheassessmentofuterinecavityaftercesareansection