Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?

Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer can help target prevention programs, and possibly reduce morbidity and mortality. A positive result of BRCA1/2 is a substantial risk factor for breast and ovarian cancer, and its detection often leads to risk reduction interventions such as increased scr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Talya Miron-Shatz, Yaniv Hanoch, Benjamin A. Katz, Glen M. Doniger, Elissa M. Ozanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2015-07-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15201/jdm15201.pdf
_version_ 1797705128970551296
author Talya Miron-Shatz
Yaniv Hanoch
Benjamin A. Katz
Glen M. Doniger
Elissa M. Ozanne
author_facet Talya Miron-Shatz
Yaniv Hanoch
Benjamin A. Katz
Glen M. Doniger
Elissa M. Ozanne
author_sort Talya Miron-Shatz
collection DOAJ
description Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer can help target prevention programs, and possibly reduce morbidity and mortality. A positive result of BRCA1/2 is a substantial risk factor for breast and ovarian cancer, and its detection often leads to risk reduction interventions such as increased screening, prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy. We examined predictors of the decision to undergo cancer related genetic testing: perceived risk, family risk of breast or ovarian cancer, and numeracy as predictors of the decision to test among women at high risk of breast cancer. Stepwise regression analysis of survey responses from 459 women registered in the Cancer Genetics Network revealed greater likelihood to test for women with more family history, higher perceived risk of mutation, or Ashkenazi descent. Neither subjective nor objective numeracy was associated with the decision to test, although we replicated an earlier finding that subjective numeracy predicted willingness to pay for testing. Findings underscore the need for genetic counselling that disentangles risk perception from objective information to promote better decision-making in the context of genetic testing. Highlighting these factors is crucial for public health campaigns, as well as to clinic-based testing and direct-to-consumer testing.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:32:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a0e049bc8cc450dacf5faa8292194e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:32:33Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-7a0e049bc8cc450dacf5faa8292194e52023-09-03T06:50:51ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752015-07-01104386399Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?Talya Miron-ShatzYaniv HanochBenjamin A. KatzGlen M. DonigerElissa M. OzanneGenetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer can help target prevention programs, and possibly reduce morbidity and mortality. A positive result of BRCA1/2 is a substantial risk factor for breast and ovarian cancer, and its detection often leads to risk reduction interventions such as increased screening, prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy. We examined predictors of the decision to undergo cancer related genetic testing: perceived risk, family risk of breast or ovarian cancer, and numeracy as predictors of the decision to test among women at high risk of breast cancer. Stepwise regression analysis of survey responses from 459 women registered in the Cancer Genetics Network revealed greater likelihood to test for women with more family history, higher perceived risk of mutation, or Ashkenazi descent. Neither subjective nor objective numeracy was associated with the decision to test, although we replicated an earlier finding that subjective numeracy predicted willingness to pay for testing. Findings underscore the need for genetic counselling that disentangles risk perception from objective information to promote better decision-making in the context of genetic testing. Highlighting these factors is crucial for public health campaigns, as well as to clinic-based testing and direct-to-consumer testing.http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15201/jdm15201.pdfwillingness to test genetic testing breast cancer BRCA1 and 2 subjective numeracy family history. early detection.NAKeywords
spellingShingle Talya Miron-Shatz
Yaniv Hanoch
Benjamin A. Katz
Glen M. Doniger
Elissa M. Ozanne
Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?
Judgment and Decision Making
willingness to test
genetic testing
breast cancer
BRCA1 and 2
subjective numeracy
family history. early detection.NAKeywords
title Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?
title_full Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?
title_fullStr Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?
title_full_unstemmed Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?
title_short Willingness to test for BRCA1/2 in high risk women: Influenced by risk perception and family experience, rather than by objective or subjective numeracy?
title_sort willingness to test for brca1 2 in high risk women influenced by risk perception and family experience rather than by objective or subjective numeracy
topic willingness to test
genetic testing
breast cancer
BRCA1 and 2
subjective numeracy
family history. early detection.NAKeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15201/jdm15201.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT talyamironshatz willingnesstotestforbrca12inhighriskwomeninfluencedbyriskperceptionandfamilyexperienceratherthanbyobjectiveorsubjectivenumeracy
AT yanivhanoch willingnesstotestforbrca12inhighriskwomeninfluencedbyriskperceptionandfamilyexperienceratherthanbyobjectiveorsubjectivenumeracy
AT benjaminakatz willingnesstotestforbrca12inhighriskwomeninfluencedbyriskperceptionandfamilyexperienceratherthanbyobjectiveorsubjectivenumeracy
AT glenmdoniger willingnesstotestforbrca12inhighriskwomeninfluencedbyriskperceptionandfamilyexperienceratherthanbyobjectiveorsubjectivenumeracy
AT elissamozanne willingnesstotestforbrca12inhighriskwomeninfluencedbyriskperceptionandfamilyexperienceratherthanbyobjectiveorsubjectivenumeracy