Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction

Aim. To outline echocardiographic features and assess their prognostic significance for major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs) within 12 months in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (MI), compared to type 1 MI (T1MI).Material and methods. The prospective observational study included 161...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. H. Hoang, V. V. Maiskov, I. A. Merai, A. F. Safarova, Z. D. Kobalava
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Столичная издательская компания 2023-11-01
Series:Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/2940
_version_ 1797232026769686528
author T. H. Hoang
V. V. Maiskov
I. A. Merai
A. F. Safarova
Z. D. Kobalava
author_facet T. H. Hoang
V. V. Maiskov
I. A. Merai
A. F. Safarova
Z. D. Kobalava
author_sort T. H. Hoang
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To outline echocardiographic features and assess their prognostic significance for major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs) within 12 months in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (MI), compared to type 1 MI (T1MI).Material and methods. The prospective observational study included 161 MI patients who underwent coronary angiography within 24 hours of admission. Type 2 MI (T2MI) diagnosis aligned with the Fourth Universal Definition. Echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed within 72 hours of hospitalization. MACEs encompassed cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and HF-related readmissions. Logistic regression analysis was conducted  to evaluate their associations with the outcomes.Results. T2MI were diagnosed in 74 patients (median age, 65 years; males, 55,4%). During follow up, 18 patients for each MI type experienced at least one MACE event. Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%) was observed in 41 (55.4%) T2MI patients, compared with 66 (75.9%) T1MI patients (p=0.014). Median LVEF and global longitudinal strain [GLS] were 47.5% and 13.4%, respectively, for T2MI, compared to 45% and 13.9%, respectively, for T1MI (p=0.032 and p=0.332, respectively). LV diastolic dysfunction [DD] was observed in 56 (75.7%) T2MI and 77 (88.5%) T1MI patients. Grade III was more frequent in T2MI in comparison with T1MI (14.9% vs 1.1%, p=0.001, respectively), whereas grade I was more common in T1MI patients (75.9% vs 43.2%, p=0.004, respectively). Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was observed more frequent in T2MI patients, compared to those with T2MI (52.7% vs. 35.6%, p=0.025, respectively). In univariate analysis, grade III DD was significantly associated with MACEs in T2MI (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–18.5, p=0.017). In multivariate analysis, GLS ≤ 9.6% (OR = 17.3, 95% CI 3.0-99.5, p=0.001), and prior MI (OR = 16.6, 95% CI 1.7–157.6, p=0.015) were significantly associated with a heightened risk of MACEs in T2MI patients.Conclusion. Patients with T2MI had high prevalence of LV and RV dysfunction. Echocardiographic assessments, particularly speckle-tracking echocardiography, hold promise in predicting adverse outcomes for these individuals.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:00:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a1be62d34424c1cbdf04374572c338b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1819-6446
2225-3653
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:53:44Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Столичная издательская компания
record_format Article
series Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
spelling doaj.art-7a1be62d34424c1cbdf04374572c338b2024-04-01T07:43:43ZengСтоличная издательская компанияРациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии1819-64462225-36532023-11-0119546146910.20996/1819-6446-2023-29402150Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial InfarctionT. H. Hoang0V. V. Maiskov1I. A. Merai2A. F. Safarova3Z. D. Kobalava4Pham Ngoc Thach University of MedicinePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Vinogradov Moscow City Clinical HospitalPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Vinogradov Moscow City Clinical HospitalPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Vinogradov Moscow City Clinical HospitalPeoples’ Friendship University of RussiaAim. To outline echocardiographic features and assess their prognostic significance for major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs) within 12 months in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (MI), compared to type 1 MI (T1MI).Material and methods. The prospective observational study included 161 MI patients who underwent coronary angiography within 24 hours of admission. Type 2 MI (T2MI) diagnosis aligned with the Fourth Universal Definition. Echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed within 72 hours of hospitalization. MACEs encompassed cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and HF-related readmissions. Logistic regression analysis was conducted  to evaluate their associations with the outcomes.Results. T2MI were diagnosed in 74 patients (median age, 65 years; males, 55,4%). During follow up, 18 patients for each MI type experienced at least one MACE event. Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%) was observed in 41 (55.4%) T2MI patients, compared with 66 (75.9%) T1MI patients (p=0.014). Median LVEF and global longitudinal strain [GLS] were 47.5% and 13.4%, respectively, for T2MI, compared to 45% and 13.9%, respectively, for T1MI (p=0.032 and p=0.332, respectively). LV diastolic dysfunction [DD] was observed in 56 (75.7%) T2MI and 77 (88.5%) T1MI patients. Grade III was more frequent in T2MI in comparison with T1MI (14.9% vs 1.1%, p=0.001, respectively), whereas grade I was more common in T1MI patients (75.9% vs 43.2%, p=0.004, respectively). Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was observed more frequent in T2MI patients, compared to those with T2MI (52.7% vs. 35.6%, p=0.025, respectively). In univariate analysis, grade III DD was significantly associated with MACEs in T2MI (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–18.5, p=0.017). In multivariate analysis, GLS ≤ 9.6% (OR = 17.3, 95% CI 3.0-99.5, p=0.001), and prior MI (OR = 16.6, 95% CI 1.7–157.6, p=0.015) were significantly associated with a heightened risk of MACEs in T2MI patients.Conclusion. Patients with T2MI had high prevalence of LV and RV dysfunction. Echocardiographic assessments, particularly speckle-tracking echocardiography, hold promise in predicting adverse outcomes for these individuals.https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/2940type 2 myocardial infarctionsystolic functiondiastolic functionglobal longitudinal strain
spellingShingle T. H. Hoang
V. V. Maiskov
I. A. Merai
A. F. Safarova
Z. D. Kobalava
Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction
Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
type 2 myocardial infarction
systolic function
diastolic function
global longitudinal strain
title Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction
title_full Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction
title_short Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction
title_sort prognostic significance of echocardiographic characteristics in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction
topic type 2 myocardial infarction
systolic function
diastolic function
global longitudinal strain
url https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/2940
work_keys_str_mv AT thhoang prognosticsignificanceofechocardiographiccharacteristicsinpatientswithtype2myocardialinfarctioncomparisonwithtype1myocardialinfarction
AT vvmaiskov prognosticsignificanceofechocardiographiccharacteristicsinpatientswithtype2myocardialinfarctioncomparisonwithtype1myocardialinfarction
AT iamerai prognosticsignificanceofechocardiographiccharacteristicsinpatientswithtype2myocardialinfarctioncomparisonwithtype1myocardialinfarction
AT afsafarova prognosticsignificanceofechocardiographiccharacteristicsinpatientswithtype2myocardialinfarctioncomparisonwithtype1myocardialinfarction
AT zdkobalava prognosticsignificanceofechocardiographiccharacteristicsinpatientswithtype2myocardialinfarctioncomparisonwithtype1myocardialinfarction