A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff

Justice is the primary criterion for evaluating the law. Chinese free trade zones aim to attract foreign investment and promote economic development efficiency, but their judicial reform goal still needs to be justice. Given the importance of balancing justice and efficiency, this study assesses whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yutian Jiang, Na Zhang
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023-02-01
Colección:Heliyon
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023005510
_version_ 1828000818202148864
author Yutian Jiang
Na Zhang
author_facet Yutian Jiang
Na Zhang
author_sort Yutian Jiang
collection DOAJ
description Justice is the primary criterion for evaluating the law. Chinese free trade zones aim to attract foreign investment and promote economic development efficiency, but their judicial reform goal still needs to be justice. Given the importance of balancing justice and efficiency, this study assesses whether the judiciary sacrifices justice for the sake of economic efficiency in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises acting as the plaintiff. By introducing commercial factors such as enterprise subject and legal resource characteristics into a theoretical model, this study develops a hierarchical regression model to investigate the judicial process in free trade zones. This study statistically analyzes data from judgments and enterprises' public information, quantitatively evaluating the realization of judicial justice. This study finds: First, plaintiffs’ violated rights and interests have been protected and compensated, that is, the judicial result has been just; Second, judicial practice in this field has the characteristics of neutrality, equality, participation, and openness and adheres to the principle of “the same case has the same judgment”, that is, the judicial procedure has been just. Accordingly, this study argues that judicial justice has not given way to economic efficiencies, such as attracting foreign investment, in cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T06:20:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a1c7f4711f34540a6d79afb9dc0cd96
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T06:20:38Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-7a1c7f4711f34540a6d79afb9dc0cd962023-03-02T05:01:07ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-02-0192e13344A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiffYutian Jiang0Na Zhang1Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China; Corresponding author. Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China; Beijing Laboratory of National Economic Security Early-Warning Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China; Corresponding author. Beijing Laboratory of National Economic Security Early-Warning Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.Justice is the primary criterion for evaluating the law. Chinese free trade zones aim to attract foreign investment and promote economic development efficiency, but their judicial reform goal still needs to be justice. Given the importance of balancing justice and efficiency, this study assesses whether the judiciary sacrifices justice for the sake of economic efficiency in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises acting as the plaintiff. By introducing commercial factors such as enterprise subject and legal resource characteristics into a theoretical model, this study develops a hierarchical regression model to investigate the judicial process in free trade zones. This study statistically analyzes data from judgments and enterprises' public information, quantitatively evaluating the realization of judicial justice. This study finds: First, plaintiffs’ violated rights and interests have been protected and compensated, that is, the judicial result has been just; Second, judicial practice in this field has the characteristics of neutrality, equality, participation, and openness and adheres to the principle of “the same case has the same judgment”, that is, the judicial procedure has been just. Accordingly, this study argues that judicial justice has not given way to economic efficiencies, such as attracting foreign investment, in cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023005510Free trade zoneJudicial justiceCivil caseHierarchical regression model
spellingShingle Yutian Jiang
Na Zhang
A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff
Heliyon
Free trade zone
Judicial justice
Civil case
Hierarchical regression model
title A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff
title_full A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff
title_fullStr A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff
title_short A quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with Chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff
title_sort quantitative evaluation of judicial justice in civil cases with chinese free trade zone enterprises as the plaintiff
topic Free trade zone
Judicial justice
Civil case
Hierarchical regression model
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023005510
work_keys_str_mv AT yutianjiang aquantitativeevaluationofjudicialjusticeincivilcaseswithchinesefreetradezoneenterprisesastheplaintiff
AT nazhang aquantitativeevaluationofjudicialjusticeincivilcaseswithchinesefreetradezoneenterprisesastheplaintiff
AT yutianjiang quantitativeevaluationofjudicialjusticeincivilcaseswithchinesefreetradezoneenterprisesastheplaintiff
AT nazhang quantitativeevaluationofjudicialjusticeincivilcaseswithchinesefreetradezoneenterprisesastheplaintiff