Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience

Mainstream cognitive neuroscience aims to build mechanistic explanations of behavior by mapping abilities described at the organismal level via the subpersonal level of computation onto specific brain networks. We provide an integrative review of these commitments and their mismatch with empirical r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthieu M. de Wit, Heath E. Matheson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903960/full
_version_ 1828329591263985664
author Matthieu M. de Wit
Heath E. Matheson
author_facet Matthieu M. de Wit
Heath E. Matheson
author_sort Matthieu M. de Wit
collection DOAJ
description Mainstream cognitive neuroscience aims to build mechanistic explanations of behavior by mapping abilities described at the organismal level via the subpersonal level of computation onto specific brain networks. We provide an integrative review of these commitments and their mismatch with empirical research findings. Context-dependent neural tuning, neural reuse, degeneracy, plasticity, functional recovery, and the neural correlates of enculturated skills each show that there is a lack of stable mappings between organismal, computational, and neural levels of analysis. We furthermore highlight recent research suggesting that task context at the organismal level determines the dynamic parcellation of functional components at the neural level. Such instability prevents the establishment of specific computational descriptions of neural function, which remains a central goal of many brain mappers – including those who are sympathetic to the notion of many-to-many mappings between organismal and neural levels. This between-level instability presents a deep epistemological challenge and requires a reorientation of methodological and theoretical commitments within cognitive neuroscience. We demonstrate the need for change to brain mapping efforts in the face of instability if cognitive neuroscience is to maintain its central goal of constructing computational mechanistic explanations of behavior; we show that such explanations must be contextual at all levels.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:27:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a25757e0b8a46f888ed0e501914fc91
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:27:46Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-7a25757e0b8a46f888ed0e501914fc912022-12-22T02:31:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-07-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.903960903960Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscienceMatthieu M. de Wit0Heath E. Matheson1Department of Neuroscience, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, CanadaMainstream cognitive neuroscience aims to build mechanistic explanations of behavior by mapping abilities described at the organismal level via the subpersonal level of computation onto specific brain networks. We provide an integrative review of these commitments and their mismatch with empirical research findings. Context-dependent neural tuning, neural reuse, degeneracy, plasticity, functional recovery, and the neural correlates of enculturated skills each show that there is a lack of stable mappings between organismal, computational, and neural levels of analysis. We furthermore highlight recent research suggesting that task context at the organismal level determines the dynamic parcellation of functional components at the neural level. Such instability prevents the establishment of specific computational descriptions of neural function, which remains a central goal of many brain mappers – including those who are sympathetic to the notion of many-to-many mappings between organismal and neural levels. This between-level instability presents a deep epistemological challenge and requires a reorientation of methodological and theoretical commitments within cognitive neuroscience. We demonstrate the need for change to brain mapping efforts in the face of instability if cognitive neuroscience is to maintain its central goal of constructing computational mechanistic explanations of behavior; we show that such explanations must be contextual at all levels.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903960/fullcognitive neurosciencedegeneracyfunctional brain mappinglevels of analysismany-to-many mappingsmechanistic explanation
spellingShingle Matthieu M. de Wit
Heath E. Matheson
Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
Frontiers in Psychology
cognitive neuroscience
degeneracy
functional brain mapping
levels of analysis
many-to-many mappings
mechanistic explanation
title Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
title_full Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
title_fullStr Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
title_short Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
title_sort context sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
topic cognitive neuroscience
degeneracy
functional brain mapping
levels of analysis
many-to-many mappings
mechanistic explanation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903960/full
work_keys_str_mv AT matthieumdewit contextsensitivecomputationalmechanisticexplanationincognitiveneuroscience
AT heathematheson contextsensitivecomputationalmechanisticexplanationincognitiveneuroscience