THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW

The rule Lex posterior derogat legi priori (the later law cancels the earlier one) has a universal doctrinal meaning. The preservation of this principle over the centuries shows its importance and axiomatic character. However, the situation in the Armenian practice is different. This article discuss...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Artur S. Ghambaryan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2020-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Law
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/viewFile/25261/18912
_version_ 1818456883266060288
author Artur S. Ghambaryan
author_facet Artur S. Ghambaryan
author_sort Artur S. Ghambaryan
collection DOAJ
description The rule Lex posterior derogat legi priori (the later law cancels the earlier one) has a universal doctrinal meaning. The preservation of this principle over the centuries shows its importance and axiomatic character. However, the situation in the Armenian practice is different. This article discusses the legality of the conflict of laws rule of the RA Law On Normative Legal Acts, according to which, in the event of a conflict between the earlier and later laws in force, the earlier law applies. The author investigates the conflict rule Les posterior from comparative-legal and historical points of view, and concludes that the regulation provided by the RA Law On Normative Legal Acts contradicts the laws of dialectics, and axiomatic truths, reflected in Roman law, thus, it is essential to revise it. The philosophical basis of the new law abolishes the old rule is the law of the dialectics denial of the denial, which gives high authority and value to the Lex posterior rule. The rule Lex posterior is the means of ensuring the Constitutional freedom of generations. Freedom of generation implies that the new generation is free from the rules established by previous generations and is free to change them. In addition, a law written later must prevail over earlier laws, based on the principle of democracy by the people. Before Lex posterior derogat legi priori law is fixed in practice, in case of conflict between the old and the new norms that have equal legal force, the highest Courts of the Republic of Armenia should give preference to the legal norm that came into force later.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:33:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a258958db1a4a5586d367c89df68ac7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-2337
2408-9001
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:33:45Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN Journal of Law
spelling doaj.art-7a258958db1a4a5586d367c89df68ac72022-12-21T22:45:12ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Law2313-23372408-90012020-12-012441224123910.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-4-1224-123919603THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAWArtur S. Ghambaryan0Russian-Armenian UniversityThe rule Lex posterior derogat legi priori (the later law cancels the earlier one) has a universal doctrinal meaning. The preservation of this principle over the centuries shows its importance and axiomatic character. However, the situation in the Armenian practice is different. This article discusses the legality of the conflict of laws rule of the RA Law On Normative Legal Acts, according to which, in the event of a conflict between the earlier and later laws in force, the earlier law applies. The author investigates the conflict rule Les posterior from comparative-legal and historical points of view, and concludes that the regulation provided by the RA Law On Normative Legal Acts contradicts the laws of dialectics, and axiomatic truths, reflected in Roman law, thus, it is essential to revise it. The philosophical basis of the new law abolishes the old rule is the law of the dialectics denial of the denial, which gives high authority and value to the Lex posterior rule. The rule Lex posterior is the means of ensuring the Constitutional freedom of generations. Freedom of generation implies that the new generation is free from the rules established by previous generations and is free to change them. In addition, a law written later must prevail over earlier laws, based on the principle of democracy by the people. Before Lex posterior derogat legi priori law is fixed in practice, in case of conflict between the old and the new norms that have equal legal force, the highest Courts of the Republic of Armenia should give preference to the legal norm that came into force later.http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/viewFile/25261/18912lex posteriorconflict normlex posteriorpreviously adopted lawdemocracyfreedom of generations
spellingShingle Artur S. Ghambaryan
THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW
RUDN Journal of Law
lex posterior
conflict norm
lex posterior
previously adopted law
democracy
freedom of generations
title THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW
title_full THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW
title_fullStr THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW
title_full_unstemmed THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW
title_short THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW
title_sort conflict rule lex posterior in armenian law
topic lex posterior
conflict norm
lex posterior
previously adopted law
democracy
freedom of generations
url http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/viewFile/25261/18912
work_keys_str_mv AT artursghambaryan theconflictrulelexposteriorinarmenianlaw
AT artursghambaryan conflictrulelexposteriorinarmenianlaw