Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

Abstract Background To perform a comparative assessment of percutaneous transfacet screws (TFS) and percutaneous bilateral pedicle screws (BPS) in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases in terms of radiological examinations and cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao Lang, Tenghui Ge, Jingye Wu, Qiang Yuan, Yuqing Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01880-w
_version_ 1811291999906562048
author Zhao Lang
Tenghui Ge
Jingye Wu
Qiang Yuan
Yuqing Sun
author_facet Zhao Lang
Tenghui Ge
Jingye Wu
Qiang Yuan
Yuqing Sun
author_sort Zhao Lang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To perform a comparative assessment of percutaneous transfacet screws (TFS) and percutaneous bilateral pedicle screws (BPS) in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases in terms of radiological examinations and clinical outcomes. Methods Sixty-six patients who received single-level OLIF with percutaneous supplementary fixation assisted by the robot for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases were selected. There were 16 cases of OLIF with TFS and 50 cases of OLIF with BPS. The propensity score matching method selected 11 patients in each group with matched characteristics to perform a clinical comparison. Results The estimated blood loss was 68.2 ± 25.2 ml in the OLIF with TFS group compared to 113.6 ± 39.3 ml in the OLIF with BPS group (P < 0.05). The intervertebral disc height raised from 8.6 to 12.9 mm in the TFS group and from 8.9 to 13.9 mm in the BPS group in the immediate postoperative period, and dropped to 10.8 and 12.9 mm at the twelfth month, respectively (P < 0.05). The fusion rates were 91% and 100% for TFS and BPS groups (P > 0.05). Quantitative assessments of back/leg pain of the two groups reached a healthy level in the late period of the follow-up. Conclusion Both TFS and BPS techniques for the OLIF surgery relieve back pain caused by degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The TFS technique exhibits less blood loss compared with the BPS. A moderate cage subsidence is present in TFS but no complication is reported.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:37:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a267eb969e34d009c7fa162a33496a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:37:53Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-7a267eb969e34d009c7fa162a33496a82022-12-22T03:02:06ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822022-12-012211910.1186/s12893-022-01880-wComparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysisZhao Lang0Tenghui Ge1Jingye Wu2Qiang Yuan3Yuqing Sun4Department of Spine Surgery, Peking University 4th Clinical Medical College, Beijing Jishuitan HospitalDepartment of Spine Surgery, Peking University 4th Clinical Medical College, Beijing Jishuitan HospitalDepartment of Spine Surgery, Peking University 4th Clinical Medical College, Beijing Jishuitan HospitalDepartment of Spine Surgery, Peking University 4th Clinical Medical College, Beijing Jishuitan HospitalDepartment of Spine Surgery, Peking University 4th Clinical Medical College, Beijing Jishuitan HospitalAbstract Background To perform a comparative assessment of percutaneous transfacet screws (TFS) and percutaneous bilateral pedicle screws (BPS) in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases in terms of radiological examinations and clinical outcomes. Methods Sixty-six patients who received single-level OLIF with percutaneous supplementary fixation assisted by the robot for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases were selected. There were 16 cases of OLIF with TFS and 50 cases of OLIF with BPS. The propensity score matching method selected 11 patients in each group with matched characteristics to perform a clinical comparison. Results The estimated blood loss was 68.2 ± 25.2 ml in the OLIF with TFS group compared to 113.6 ± 39.3 ml in the OLIF with BPS group (P < 0.05). The intervertebral disc height raised from 8.6 to 12.9 mm in the TFS group and from 8.9 to 13.9 mm in the BPS group in the immediate postoperative period, and dropped to 10.8 and 12.9 mm at the twelfth month, respectively (P < 0.05). The fusion rates were 91% and 100% for TFS and BPS groups (P > 0.05). Quantitative assessments of back/leg pain of the two groups reached a healthy level in the late period of the follow-up. Conclusion Both TFS and BPS techniques for the OLIF surgery relieve back pain caused by degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The TFS technique exhibits less blood loss compared with the BPS. A moderate cage subsidence is present in TFS but no complication is reported.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01880-wOblique lateral interbody fusionDisc heightSegmental lordotic anglePedicle screwTransfacet screwDegenerative lumbar disease
spellingShingle Zhao Lang
Tenghui Ge
Jingye Wu
Qiang Yuan
Yuqing Sun
Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis
BMC Surgery
Oblique lateral interbody fusion
Disc height
Segmental lordotic angle
Pedicle screw
Transfacet screw
Degenerative lumbar disease
title Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort comparison of transfacet and pedicle screws in oblique lateral interbody fusion for single level degenerative lumbar spine diseases a retrospective propensity score matched analysis
topic Oblique lateral interbody fusion
Disc height
Segmental lordotic angle
Pedicle screw
Transfacet screw
Degenerative lumbar disease
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01880-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaolang comparisonoftransfacetandpediclescrewsinobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforsingleleveldegenerativelumbarspinediseasesaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT tenghuige comparisonoftransfacetandpediclescrewsinobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforsingleleveldegenerativelumbarspinediseasesaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT jingyewu comparisonoftransfacetandpediclescrewsinobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforsingleleveldegenerativelumbarspinediseasesaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT qiangyuan comparisonoftransfacetandpediclescrewsinobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforsingleleveldegenerativelumbarspinediseasesaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT yuqingsun comparisonoftransfacetandpediclescrewsinobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforsingleleveldegenerativelumbarspinediseasesaretrospectivepropensityscorematchedanalysis