When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant Integration

In this study, we investigated how perceived ethnic discrimination is related to attitudes towards the national majority group and willingness to confront injustice to promote the social standing of a minority group. We examined this relationship via two mediating factors; national (dis)identificati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti, Göksu Celikkol, Tuuli Anna Renvik, Viivi Eskelinen, Raivo Vetik, David Lackland Sam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology 2018-12-01
Series:Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/890
_version_ 1797971766347300864
author Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
Göksu Celikkol
Tuuli Anna Renvik
Viivi Eskelinen
Raivo Vetik
David Lackland Sam
author_facet Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
Göksu Celikkol
Tuuli Anna Renvik
Viivi Eskelinen
Raivo Vetik
David Lackland Sam
author_sort Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we investigated how perceived ethnic discrimination is related to attitudes towards the national majority group and willingness to confront injustice to promote the social standing of a minority group. We examined this relationship via two mediating factors; national (dis)identification from and out-group (dis)trust of the national majority group. The Rejection-Disidentification Model (RDIM) was refined, first, to account for willingness to confront injustice as a consequence of perceived rejection, and second, intergroup (dis)trust was examined as an additional mediating mechanism that can explain attitudinal and behavioural reactions to perceived rejection simultaneously with national disidentification. The model was tested in a comparative survey data of Russian-speaking minority in Estonia (N = 482), Finland (N = 254), and Norway (N = 219). In all three countries, the more Russian-speakers identified as Russians and the more they perceived ethnic discrimination, the more negative were their attitudes toward the national majority groups and the more willing they were to engage in action to confront group-based injustice. Whereas disidentification from and distrust of national majority group accounted for the discrimination-attitude link to a large extent, both factors had demobilizing effects on willingness to confront injustice, making Russian-speaking immigrants more passive but hostile. The findings are discussed in relation to the risks involved in politicization of immigrants struggling with perceived inequalities.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:37:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a32192b82fb42909b6d39e0bc59a90c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2195-3325
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:37:46Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
record_format Article
series Journal of Social and Political Psychology
spelling doaj.art-7a32192b82fb42909b6d39e0bc59a90c2023-01-02T04:50:08ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologyJournal of Social and Political Psychology2195-33252018-12-016248451010.5964/jspp.v6i2.890jspp.v6i2.890When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant IntegrationInga Jasinskaja-Lahti0Göksu Celikkol1Tuuli Anna Renvik2Viivi Eskelinen3Raivo Vetik4David Lackland Sam5Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandOpen University, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandSchool of Governance, Law and Society, Tallinn University, Tallinn, EstoniaDepartment of Psychosocial Science & Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayIn this study, we investigated how perceived ethnic discrimination is related to attitudes towards the national majority group and willingness to confront injustice to promote the social standing of a minority group. We examined this relationship via two mediating factors; national (dis)identification from and out-group (dis)trust of the national majority group. The Rejection-Disidentification Model (RDIM) was refined, first, to account for willingness to confront injustice as a consequence of perceived rejection, and second, intergroup (dis)trust was examined as an additional mediating mechanism that can explain attitudinal and behavioural reactions to perceived rejection simultaneously with national disidentification. The model was tested in a comparative survey data of Russian-speaking minority in Estonia (N = 482), Finland (N = 254), and Norway (N = 219). In all three countries, the more Russian-speakers identified as Russians and the more they perceived ethnic discrimination, the more negative were their attitudes toward the national majority groups and the more willing they were to engage in action to confront group-based injustice. Whereas disidentification from and distrust of national majority group accounted for the discrimination-attitude link to a large extent, both factors had demobilizing effects on willingness to confront injustice, making Russian-speaking immigrants more passive but hostile. The findings are discussed in relation to the risks involved in politicization of immigrants struggling with perceived inequalities.http://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/890discriminationnational disidentificationtrustout-group attitudescollective action
spellingShingle Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
Göksu Celikkol
Tuuli Anna Renvik
Viivi Eskelinen
Raivo Vetik
David Lackland Sam
When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant Integration
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
discrimination
national disidentification
trust
out-group attitudes
collective action
title When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant Integration
title_full When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant Integration
title_fullStr When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant Integration
title_full_unstemmed When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant Integration
title_short When Psychological Contract Is Violated: Revisiting the Rejection-Disidentification Model of Immigrant Integration
title_sort when psychological contract is violated revisiting the rejection disidentification model of immigrant integration
topic discrimination
national disidentification
trust
out-group attitudes
collective action
url http://jspp.psychopen.eu/article/view/890
work_keys_str_mv AT ingajasinskajalahti whenpsychologicalcontractisviolatedrevisitingtherejectiondisidentificationmodelofimmigrantintegration
AT goksucelikkol whenpsychologicalcontractisviolatedrevisitingtherejectiondisidentificationmodelofimmigrantintegration
AT tuuliannarenvik whenpsychologicalcontractisviolatedrevisitingtherejectiondisidentificationmodelofimmigrantintegration
AT viivieskelinen whenpsychologicalcontractisviolatedrevisitingtherejectiondisidentificationmodelofimmigrantintegration
AT raivovetik whenpsychologicalcontractisviolatedrevisitingtherejectiondisidentificationmodelofimmigrantintegration
AT davidlacklandsam whenpsychologicalcontractisviolatedrevisitingtherejectiondisidentificationmodelofimmigrantintegration