Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic Rheologies

Abstract Strain localization and resulting plasticity and failure play an important role in the evolution of the lithosphere. These phenomena are commonly modeled by Stokes flows with viscoplastic rheologies. The nonlinearities of these rheologies make the numerical solution of the resulting systems...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johann Rudi, Yu‐hsuan Shih, Georg Stadler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009059
_version_ 1797637950061674496
author Johann Rudi
Yu‐hsuan Shih
Georg Stadler
author_facet Johann Rudi
Yu‐hsuan Shih
Georg Stadler
author_sort Johann Rudi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Strain localization and resulting plasticity and failure play an important role in the evolution of the lithosphere. These phenomena are commonly modeled by Stokes flows with viscoplastic rheologies. The nonlinearities of these rheologies make the numerical solution of the resulting systems challenging, and iterative methods often converge slowly or not at all. Yet accurate solutions are critical for representing the physics. Moreover, for some rheology laws, aspects of solvability are still unknown. We study a basic but representative viscoplastic rheology law. The law involves a yield stress that is independent of the dynamic pressure, referred to as von Mises yield criterion. Two commonly used variants, perfect/ideal and composite viscoplasticity, are compared. We derive both variants from energy minimization principles, and we use this perspective to argue when solutions are unique. We propose a new stress‐velocity Newton solution algorithm that treats the stress as an independent variable during the Newton linearization but requires solution only of Stokes systems that are of the usual velocity‐pressure form. To study different solution algorithms, we implement 2‐D and 3‐D finite element discretizations, and we generate Stokes problems with up to 7 orders of magnitude viscosity contrasts, in which compression or tension results in significant nonlinear localization effects. Comparing the performance of the proposed Newton method with the standard Newton method and the Picard fixed‐point method, we observe a significant reduction in the number of iterations and improved stability with respect to problem nonlinearity, mesh refinement, and the polynomial order of the discretization.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:55:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a32568d59304045b967c0f8998828d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:55:37Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj.art-7a32568d59304045b967c0f8998828d22023-11-03T17:01:08ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272020-09-01219n/an/a10.1029/2020GC009059Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic RheologiesJohann Rudi0Yu‐hsuan Shih1Georg Stadler2Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USACourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University New York NY USACourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University New York NY USAAbstract Strain localization and resulting plasticity and failure play an important role in the evolution of the lithosphere. These phenomena are commonly modeled by Stokes flows with viscoplastic rheologies. The nonlinearities of these rheologies make the numerical solution of the resulting systems challenging, and iterative methods often converge slowly or not at all. Yet accurate solutions are critical for representing the physics. Moreover, for some rheology laws, aspects of solvability are still unknown. We study a basic but representative viscoplastic rheology law. The law involves a yield stress that is independent of the dynamic pressure, referred to as von Mises yield criterion. Two commonly used variants, perfect/ideal and composite viscoplasticity, are compared. We derive both variants from energy minimization principles, and we use this perspective to argue when solutions are unique. We propose a new stress‐velocity Newton solution algorithm that treats the stress as an independent variable during the Newton linearization but requires solution only of Stokes systems that are of the usual velocity‐pressure form. To study different solution algorithms, we implement 2‐D and 3‐D finite element discretizations, and we generate Stokes problems with up to 7 orders of magnitude viscosity contrasts, in which compression or tension results in significant nonlinear localization effects. Comparing the performance of the proposed Newton method with the standard Newton method and the Picard fixed‐point method, we observe a significant reduction in the number of iterations and improved stability with respect to problem nonlinearity, mesh refinement, and the polynomial order of the discretization.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009059computational geodynamicsviscoplasticityincompressible StokessolvabilityNewton's method
spellingShingle Johann Rudi
Yu‐hsuan Shih
Georg Stadler
Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic Rheologies
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
computational geodynamics
viscoplasticity
incompressible Stokes
solvability
Newton's method
title Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic Rheologies
title_full Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic Rheologies
title_fullStr Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic Rheologies
title_full_unstemmed Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic Rheologies
title_short Advanced Newton Methods for Geodynamical Models of Stokes Flow With Viscoplastic Rheologies
title_sort advanced newton methods for geodynamical models of stokes flow with viscoplastic rheologies
topic computational geodynamics
viscoplasticity
incompressible Stokes
solvability
Newton's method
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009059
work_keys_str_mv AT johannrudi advancednewtonmethodsforgeodynamicalmodelsofstokesflowwithviscoplasticrheologies
AT yuhsuanshih advancednewtonmethodsforgeodynamicalmodelsofstokesflowwithviscoplasticrheologies
AT georgstadler advancednewtonmethodsforgeodynamicalmodelsofstokesflowwithviscoplasticrheologies