Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Background: Evidence on effective strategies to ensure sustainability of research capacity strengthening interventions in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions is lacking. This systematic review identified publications describing research capacity building programs and noted their effec...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2021-02-01
|
Series: | AAS Open Research |
Online Access: | https://aasopenresearch.org/articles/3-43/v3 |
_version_ | 1797727497779937280 |
---|---|
author | Marta Vicente-Crespo Ojo Agunbiade John Eyers Margaret Thorogood Sharon Fonn |
author_facet | Marta Vicente-Crespo Ojo Agunbiade John Eyers Margaret Thorogood Sharon Fonn |
author_sort | Marta Vicente-Crespo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Evidence on effective strategies to ensure sustainability of research capacity strengthening interventions in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions is lacking. This systematic review identified publications describing research capacity building programs and noted their effect, their contexts, and the mechanisms, processes and social actors employed in them. Methods: We searched online databases for the period 2011-2018. Inclusion criteria were that the publications 1) described the intervention; 2) were implemented in LMICs; 3) were based in, or relevant to, university staff or post docs; 4) aimed to improve research capacity; 5) aimed to effect change at the institutional level. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full text in consecutive rounds, a third resolved disagreements. Two people extracted the data of each full text using a data extraction tool covering data relevant to our question. Results: In total 4052 citations were identified and 19 papers were included, which referred to 14 interventions. Only three interventions mentioned using a conceptual framework to develop their approach and none described using a theory of change to assess outcomes. The most frequent inputs described were some method of formal training, promotion of a research-conducive environment and establishment of research support systems. A range of outcomes were reported, most frequently an increased number of publications and proportion of staff with PhDs. When factors of success were discussed, this was attributed to a rigorous approach to implementation, adequate funding, and local buy-in. Those who mentioned sustainability linked it to availability of funds and local buy-in. The lack of a common lexicon and a framework against which to report outcomes made comparison between initiatives difficult. Conclusions: The reduced number of interventions that met the inclusion criteria suggests that programs should be well-described, evaluated systematically, and findings published so that the research capacity strengthening community can extract important lessons. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T11:00:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7a3640783e0b4ef69b1f91905553a23c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2515-9321 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T11:00:35Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | F1000 Research Ltd |
record_format | Article |
series | AAS Open Research |
spelling | doaj.art-7a3640783e0b4ef69b1f91905553a23c2023-09-02T05:47:16ZengF1000 Research LtdAAS Open Research2515-93212021-02-01310.12688/aasopenres.13116.314318Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]Marta Vicente-Crespo0Ojo Agunbiade1John Eyers2Margaret Thorogood3Sharon Fonn4African Population and Health Research Center, African Population and Health Research Center Campus, Nairobi, KenyaSociology and Anthropology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, NigeriaInternational Initiative for Impact Evaluation, London, UKThe University of Warwick, Coventry, UKSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaBackground: Evidence on effective strategies to ensure sustainability of research capacity strengthening interventions in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions is lacking. This systematic review identified publications describing research capacity building programs and noted their effect, their contexts, and the mechanisms, processes and social actors employed in them. Methods: We searched online databases for the period 2011-2018. Inclusion criteria were that the publications 1) described the intervention; 2) were implemented in LMICs; 3) were based in, or relevant to, university staff or post docs; 4) aimed to improve research capacity; 5) aimed to effect change at the institutional level. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full text in consecutive rounds, a third resolved disagreements. Two people extracted the data of each full text using a data extraction tool covering data relevant to our question. Results: In total 4052 citations were identified and 19 papers were included, which referred to 14 interventions. Only three interventions mentioned using a conceptual framework to develop their approach and none described using a theory of change to assess outcomes. The most frequent inputs described were some method of formal training, promotion of a research-conducive environment and establishment of research support systems. A range of outcomes were reported, most frequently an increased number of publications and proportion of staff with PhDs. When factors of success were discussed, this was attributed to a rigorous approach to implementation, adequate funding, and local buy-in. Those who mentioned sustainability linked it to availability of funds and local buy-in. The lack of a common lexicon and a framework against which to report outcomes made comparison between initiatives difficult. Conclusions: The reduced number of interventions that met the inclusion criteria suggests that programs should be well-described, evaluated systematically, and findings published so that the research capacity strengthening community can extract important lessons.https://aasopenresearch.org/articles/3-43/v3 |
spellingShingle | Marta Vicente-Crespo Ojo Agunbiade John Eyers Margaret Thorogood Sharon Fonn Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] AAS Open Research |
title | Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full | Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_fullStr | Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full_unstemmed | Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_short | Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_sort | institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in lmics a systematic review and meta synthesis version 3 peer review 2 approved |
url | https://aasopenresearch.org/articles/3-43/v3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martavicentecrespo institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved AT ojoagunbiade institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved AT johneyers institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved AT margaretthorogood institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved AT sharonfonn institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved |