Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Evidence on effective strategies to ensure sustainability of research capacity strengthening interventions in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions is lacking. This systematic review identified publications describing research capacity building programs and noted their effec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Vicente-Crespo, Ojo Agunbiade, John Eyers, Margaret Thorogood, Sharon Fonn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2021-02-01
Series:AAS Open Research
Online Access:https://aasopenresearch.org/articles/3-43/v3
_version_ 1797727497779937280
author Marta Vicente-Crespo
Ojo Agunbiade
John Eyers
Margaret Thorogood
Sharon Fonn
author_facet Marta Vicente-Crespo
Ojo Agunbiade
John Eyers
Margaret Thorogood
Sharon Fonn
author_sort Marta Vicente-Crespo
collection DOAJ
description Background: Evidence on effective strategies to ensure sustainability of research capacity strengthening interventions in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions is lacking. This systematic review identified publications describing research capacity building programs and noted their effect, their contexts, and the mechanisms, processes and social actors employed in them. Methods: We searched online databases for the period 2011-2018. Inclusion criteria were that the publications 1) described the intervention; 2) were implemented in LMICs; 3) were based in, or relevant to, university staff or post docs; 4) aimed to improve research capacity; 5) aimed to effect change at the institutional level. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full text in consecutive rounds, a third resolved disagreements. Two people extracted the data of each full text using a data extraction tool covering data relevant to our question. Results: In total 4052 citations were identified and 19 papers were included, which referred to 14 interventions. Only three interventions mentioned using a conceptual framework to develop their approach and none described using a theory of change to assess outcomes. The most frequent inputs described were some method of formal training, promotion of a research-conducive environment and establishment of research support systems. A range of outcomes were reported, most frequently an increased number of publications and proportion of staff with PhDs. When factors of success were discussed, this was attributed to a rigorous approach to implementation, adequate funding, and local buy-in. Those who mentioned sustainability linked it to availability of funds and local buy-in. The lack of a common lexicon and a framework against which to report outcomes made comparison between initiatives difficult. Conclusions: The reduced number of interventions that met the inclusion criteria suggests that programs should be well-described, evaluated systematically, and findings published so that the research capacity strengthening community can extract important lessons.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:00:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a3640783e0b4ef69b1f91905553a23c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2515-9321
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:00:35Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series AAS Open Research
spelling doaj.art-7a3640783e0b4ef69b1f91905553a23c2023-09-02T05:47:16ZengF1000 Research LtdAAS Open Research2515-93212021-02-01310.12688/aasopenres.13116.314318Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]Marta Vicente-Crespo0Ojo Agunbiade1John Eyers2Margaret Thorogood3Sharon Fonn4African Population and Health Research Center, African Population and Health Research Center Campus, Nairobi, KenyaSociology and Anthropology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, NigeriaInternational Initiative for Impact Evaluation, London, UKThe University of Warwick, Coventry, UKSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaBackground: Evidence on effective strategies to ensure sustainability of research capacity strengthening interventions in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) institutions is lacking. This systematic review identified publications describing research capacity building programs and noted their effect, their contexts, and the mechanisms, processes and social actors employed in them. Methods: We searched online databases for the period 2011-2018. Inclusion criteria were that the publications 1) described the intervention; 2) were implemented in LMICs; 3) were based in, or relevant to, university staff or post docs; 4) aimed to improve research capacity; 5) aimed to effect change at the institutional level. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full text in consecutive rounds, a third resolved disagreements. Two people extracted the data of each full text using a data extraction tool covering data relevant to our question. Results: In total 4052 citations were identified and 19 papers were included, which referred to 14 interventions. Only three interventions mentioned using a conceptual framework to develop their approach and none described using a theory of change to assess outcomes. The most frequent inputs described were some method of formal training, promotion of a research-conducive environment and establishment of research support systems. A range of outcomes were reported, most frequently an increased number of publications and proportion of staff with PhDs. When factors of success were discussed, this was attributed to a rigorous approach to implementation, adequate funding, and local buy-in. Those who mentioned sustainability linked it to availability of funds and local buy-in. The lack of a common lexicon and a framework against which to report outcomes made comparison between initiatives difficult. Conclusions: The reduced number of interventions that met the inclusion criteria suggests that programs should be well-described, evaluated systematically, and findings published so that the research capacity strengthening community can extract important lessons.https://aasopenresearch.org/articles/3-43/v3
spellingShingle Marta Vicente-Crespo
Ojo Agunbiade
John Eyers
Margaret Thorogood
Sharon Fonn
Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
AAS Open Research
title Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort institutionalizing research capacity strengthening in lmics a systematic review and meta synthesis version 3 peer review 2 approved
url https://aasopenresearch.org/articles/3-43/v3
work_keys_str_mv AT martavicentecrespo institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved
AT ojoagunbiade institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved
AT johneyers institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved
AT margaretthorogood institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved
AT sharonfonn institutionalizingresearchcapacitystrengtheninginlmicsasystematicreviewandmetasynthesisversion3peerreview2approved