How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?

In many studies that use data from Coupled Model Inter-comparisons Project Five (CMIP5) the large number of models included prohibits the use of data from all models. Studies based on small subsets of CMIP5 may therefore exclude a significant fraction of the plausible range of future climate changes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carol F. McSweeney, Richard G. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-03-01
Series:Climate Services
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880715300170
_version_ 1830509060890296320
author Carol F. McSweeney
Richard G. Jones
author_facet Carol F. McSweeney
Richard G. Jones
author_sort Carol F. McSweeney
collection DOAJ
description In many studies that use data from Coupled Model Inter-comparisons Project Five (CMIP5) the large number of models included prohibits the use of data from all models. Studies based on small subsets of CMIP5 may therefore exclude a significant fraction of the plausible range of future climate changes. In the Inter-sectoral Impact Model Inter-comparison Project (ISI-MIP), a subset of five CMIP5 models is used in global climate impact studies. We find that the fraction of the full range of future projections captured across different regions and seasons by the ISI-MIP subset varies from 0.5 to 0.9 for temperature (median 0.75) and 0.3 to 0.8 for precipitation (median 0.55). The implication of this is that for many regions and seasons, this subset can be expected to underestimate both the total uncertainty in future climate impact, and the proportion of total uncertainty that is attributable to the use of different GCMs. The fraction of climate model uncertainty sampled could be improved only marginally by using a strategically selected global optimal subset of 5. In order to capture > 0.8 (0.9) of the range in >75% or more of regions and seasons, at least 13 (20) models would be required. However, the use of regionally optimised subsets could significantly improve the range of regional precipitation changes captured by a subset of restricted size. The results of impact studies based on subsets of CMIP5 could be presented alongside information about how well the subset captures uncertainties in future climate to aid interpretation of impact uncertainty ranges. Keywords: CMIP5, Global climate impacts, Regional climate change, Quantifying uncertainty
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:28:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a3dd329046441b8ae114d340434f7a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8807
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:28:03Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Climate Services
spelling doaj.art-7a3dd329046441b8ae114d340434f7a42022-12-21T18:43:33ZengElsevierClimate Services2405-88072016-03-0112429How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?Carol F. McSweeney0Richard G. Jones1Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, UK; Corresponding author.Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, UK; School of Geography and Environment, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, UKIn many studies that use data from Coupled Model Inter-comparisons Project Five (CMIP5) the large number of models included prohibits the use of data from all models. Studies based on small subsets of CMIP5 may therefore exclude a significant fraction of the plausible range of future climate changes. In the Inter-sectoral Impact Model Inter-comparison Project (ISI-MIP), a subset of five CMIP5 models is used in global climate impact studies. We find that the fraction of the full range of future projections captured across different regions and seasons by the ISI-MIP subset varies from 0.5 to 0.9 for temperature (median 0.75) and 0.3 to 0.8 for precipitation (median 0.55). The implication of this is that for many regions and seasons, this subset can be expected to underestimate both the total uncertainty in future climate impact, and the proportion of total uncertainty that is attributable to the use of different GCMs. The fraction of climate model uncertainty sampled could be improved only marginally by using a strategically selected global optimal subset of 5. In order to capture > 0.8 (0.9) of the range in >75% or more of regions and seasons, at least 13 (20) models would be required. However, the use of regionally optimised subsets could significantly improve the range of regional precipitation changes captured by a subset of restricted size. The results of impact studies based on subsets of CMIP5 could be presented alongside information about how well the subset captures uncertainties in future climate to aid interpretation of impact uncertainty ranges. Keywords: CMIP5, Global climate impacts, Regional climate change, Quantifying uncertaintyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880715300170
spellingShingle Carol F. McSweeney
Richard G. Jones
How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?
Climate Services
title How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?
title_full How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?
title_fullStr How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?
title_full_unstemmed How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?
title_short How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP?
title_sort how representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 cmip5 gcms used in isi mip
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880715300170
work_keys_str_mv AT carolfmcsweeney howrepresentativeisthespreadofclimateprojectionsfromthe5cmip5gcmsusedinisimip
AT richardgjones howrepresentativeisthespreadofclimateprojectionsfromthe5cmip5gcmsusedinisimip