Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time

Objective: The goal was to compare Speckle plethysmography (SPG) and Photoplethysmography (PPG) with non-invasive finger Arterial Pressure (fiAP) regarding Pulse Wave Morphology (PWM) and Pulse Arrival Time (PAT). Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 8) were connected to a Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jorge Herranz Olazabal, Fokko Wieringa, Evelien Hermeling, Chris Van Hoof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/1/101
_version_ 1797445953841528832
author Jorge Herranz Olazabal
Fokko Wieringa
Evelien Hermeling
Chris Van Hoof
author_facet Jorge Herranz Olazabal
Fokko Wieringa
Evelien Hermeling
Chris Van Hoof
author_sort Jorge Herranz Olazabal
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The goal was to compare Speckle plethysmography (SPG) and Photoplethysmography (PPG) with non-invasive finger Arterial Pressure (fiAP) regarding Pulse Wave Morphology (PWM) and Pulse Arrival Time (PAT). Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 8) were connected to a Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) monitor providing fiAP pulse wave and PPG from a clinical transmission-mode SpO<sub>2</sub> finger clip. Biopac recorded 3-lead ECG. A camera placed at a 25 cm distance recorded a video stream (100 fps) of a finger illuminated by a laser diode at 639 nm. A chest belt (Polar) monitored respiration. All signals were recorded simultaneously during episodes of spontaneous breathing and paced breathing. Analysis: Post-processing was performed in Matlab to obtain SPG and analyze the SPG, PPG and fiAP mean absolute deviations (MADs) on PWM, plus PAT modulation. Results: Across 2599 beats, the average fiAP MAD with PPG was 0.17 (0–1) and with SPG 0.09 (0–1). PAT derived from ECG–fiAP correlated as follows: 0.65 for ECG–SPG and 0.67 for ECG–PPG. Conclusion: Compared to the clinical NIBP monitor fiAP reference, PWM from an experimental camera-derived non-contact reflective-mode SPG setup resembled fiAP significantly better than PPG from a simultaneously recorded clinical transmission-mode finger clip. For PAT values, no significant difference was found between ECG–SPG and ECG–PPG compared to ECG–fiAP.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T13:33:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a507d2b30bd48f8824b743277e31dc5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-5354
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T13:33:14Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj.art-7a507d2b30bd48f8824b743277e31dc52023-11-30T21:15:39ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542023-01-0110110110.3390/bioengineering10010101Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival TimeJorge Herranz Olazabal0Fokko Wieringa1Evelien Hermeling2Chris Van Hoof3IMEC, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumIMEC NL, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The NetherlandsIMEC NL, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The NetherlandsIMEC, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumObjective: The goal was to compare Speckle plethysmography (SPG) and Photoplethysmography (PPG) with non-invasive finger Arterial Pressure (fiAP) regarding Pulse Wave Morphology (PWM) and Pulse Arrival Time (PAT). Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 8) were connected to a Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) monitor providing fiAP pulse wave and PPG from a clinical transmission-mode SpO<sub>2</sub> finger clip. Biopac recorded 3-lead ECG. A camera placed at a 25 cm distance recorded a video stream (100 fps) of a finger illuminated by a laser diode at 639 nm. A chest belt (Polar) monitored respiration. All signals were recorded simultaneously during episodes of spontaneous breathing and paced breathing. Analysis: Post-processing was performed in Matlab to obtain SPG and analyze the SPG, PPG and fiAP mean absolute deviations (MADs) on PWM, plus PAT modulation. Results: Across 2599 beats, the average fiAP MAD with PPG was 0.17 (0–1) and with SPG 0.09 (0–1). PAT derived from ECG–fiAP correlated as follows: 0.65 for ECG–SPG and 0.67 for ECG–PPG. Conclusion: Compared to the clinical NIBP monitor fiAP reference, PWM from an experimental camera-derived non-contact reflective-mode SPG setup resembled fiAP significantly better than PPG from a simultaneously recorded clinical transmission-mode finger clip. For PAT values, no significant difference was found between ECG–SPG and ECG–PPG compared to ECG–fiAP.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/1/101camera-basedspeckle contrast analysisoptical monitoringlaser specklePPGSPG
spellingShingle Jorge Herranz Olazabal
Fokko Wieringa
Evelien Hermeling
Chris Van Hoof
Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time
Bioengineering
camera-based
speckle contrast analysis
optical monitoring
laser speckle
PPG
SPG
title Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time
title_full Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time
title_fullStr Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time
title_short Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time
title_sort comparing remote speckle plethysmography and finger clip photoplethysmography with non invasive finger arterial pressure pulse waves regarding morphology and arrival time
topic camera-based
speckle contrast analysis
optical monitoring
laser speckle
PPG
SPG
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/1/101
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgeherranzolazabal comparingremotespeckleplethysmographyandfingerclipphotoplethysmographywithnoninvasivefingerarterialpressurepulsewavesregardingmorphologyandarrivaltime
AT fokkowieringa comparingremotespeckleplethysmographyandfingerclipphotoplethysmographywithnoninvasivefingerarterialpressurepulsewavesregardingmorphologyandarrivaltime
AT evelienhermeling comparingremotespeckleplethysmographyandfingerclipphotoplethysmographywithnoninvasivefingerarterialpressurepulsewavesregardingmorphologyandarrivaltime
AT chrisvanhoof comparingremotespeckleplethysmographyandfingerclipphotoplethysmographywithnoninvasivefingerarterialpressurepulsewavesregardingmorphologyandarrivaltime