Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces

In two sequential replicates (<i>n</i> = 90 and <i>n</i> = 96 feedlot finisher cattle, respectively) we measured the impact of an <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>-based probiotic (DFM) and an altered feedlot pen environment on antimicrobial resistance among fecal enter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah A. Murray, Ashlyn C. Holbert, Keri N. Norman, Sara D. Lawhon, Jason E. Sawyer, Harvey M. Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Antibiotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/1/106
_version_ 1797496306004918272
author Sarah A. Murray
Ashlyn C. Holbert
Keri N. Norman
Sara D. Lawhon
Jason E. Sawyer
Harvey M. Scott
author_facet Sarah A. Murray
Ashlyn C. Holbert
Keri N. Norman
Sara D. Lawhon
Jason E. Sawyer
Harvey M. Scott
author_sort Sarah A. Murray
collection DOAJ
description In two sequential replicates (<i>n</i> = 90 and <i>n</i> = 96 feedlot finisher cattle, respectively) we measured the impact of an <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>-based probiotic (DFM) and an altered feedlot pen environment on antimicrobial resistance among fecal enterococci in cattle fed (or, not fed) the macrolide tylosin. Diluted fecal samples were spiral-plated on plain and antibiotic-supplemented m-<i>Enterococcus</i> agar. In the first replicate, tylosin significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) increased the relative quantity of erythromycin-resistant enterococci. This effect was diminished in cattle fed the DFM in conjunction with tylosin, indicating a macrolide susceptible probiotic may help mitigate resistance. A similar observed effect was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05) in the second replicate. Isolates were speciated and resistance phenotypes were obtained for <i>E. faecium</i> and <i>E. hirae</i>. Susceptible strains of bacteria fed as DFM may prove useful for mitigating the selective effects of antibiotic use; however, the longer-term sustainability of such an approach remains unclear.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:01:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a5f77af3a804c71a8f1fc0504e97964
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-6382
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:01:48Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Antibiotics
spelling doaj.art-7a5f77af3a804c71a8f1fc0504e979642023-11-23T12:45:28ZengMDPI AGAntibiotics2079-63822022-01-0111110610.3390/antibiotics11010106Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle FecesSarah A. Murray0Ashlyn C. Holbert1Keri N. Norman2Sara D. Lawhon3Jason E. Sawyer4Harvey M. Scott5Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USAIn two sequential replicates (<i>n</i> = 90 and <i>n</i> = 96 feedlot finisher cattle, respectively) we measured the impact of an <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>-based probiotic (DFM) and an altered feedlot pen environment on antimicrobial resistance among fecal enterococci in cattle fed (or, not fed) the macrolide tylosin. Diluted fecal samples were spiral-plated on plain and antibiotic-supplemented m-<i>Enterococcus</i> agar. In the first replicate, tylosin significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) increased the relative quantity of erythromycin-resistant enterococci. This effect was diminished in cattle fed the DFM in conjunction with tylosin, indicating a macrolide susceptible probiotic may help mitigate resistance. A similar observed effect was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05) in the second replicate. Isolates were speciated and resistance phenotypes were obtained for <i>E. faecium</i> and <i>E. hirae</i>. Susceptible strains of bacteria fed as DFM may prove useful for mitigating the selective effects of antibiotic use; however, the longer-term sustainability of such an approach remains unclear.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/1/106probiotic<i>Enterococcus faecium</i>antimicrobial resistanceenvironmental change
spellingShingle Sarah A. Murray
Ashlyn C. Holbert
Keri N. Norman
Sara D. Lawhon
Jason E. Sawyer
Harvey M. Scott
Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces
Antibiotics
probiotic
<i>Enterococcus faecium</i>
antimicrobial resistance
environmental change
title Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces
title_full Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces
title_fullStr Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces
title_short Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces
title_sort effects of tylosin a direct fed microbial and feedlot pen environment on phenotypic resistance among enterococci isolated from beef cattle feces
topic probiotic
<i>Enterococcus faecium</i>
antimicrobial resistance
environmental change
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/1/106
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahamurray effectsoftylosinadirectfedmicrobialandfeedlotpenenvironmentonphenotypicresistanceamongenterococciisolatedfrombeefcattlefeces
AT ashlyncholbert effectsoftylosinadirectfedmicrobialandfeedlotpenenvironmentonphenotypicresistanceamongenterococciisolatedfrombeefcattlefeces
AT kerinnorman effectsoftylosinadirectfedmicrobialandfeedlotpenenvironmentonphenotypicresistanceamongenterococciisolatedfrombeefcattlefeces
AT saradlawhon effectsoftylosinadirectfedmicrobialandfeedlotpenenvironmentonphenotypicresistanceamongenterococciisolatedfrombeefcattlefeces
AT jasonesawyer effectsoftylosinadirectfedmicrobialandfeedlotpenenvironmentonphenotypicresistanceamongenterococciisolatedfrombeefcattlefeces
AT harveymscott effectsoftylosinadirectfedmicrobialandfeedlotpenenvironmentonphenotypicresistanceamongenterococciisolatedfrombeefcattlefeces