Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite Floors

Human comfort is recognized as an essential serviceability requirement for timber floors. Although several standards and design criteria are available for designing steel and concrete floors, there is no consensus among researchers on the applicability of such design methods to timber composite floo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Najmeh Cheraghi-Shirazi, Keith Crews, Sardar Malek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/12/2061
_version_ 1797461149096083456
author Najmeh Cheraghi-Shirazi
Keith Crews
Sardar Malek
author_facet Najmeh Cheraghi-Shirazi
Keith Crews
Sardar Malek
author_sort Najmeh Cheraghi-Shirazi
collection DOAJ
description Human comfort is recognized as an essential serviceability requirement for timber floors. Although several standards and design criteria are available for designing steel and concrete floors, there is no consensus among researchers on the applicability of such design methods to timber composite floors. Adding steel to timber floors is intended to create long spans, however, vibration is still a major challenge in achieving longer spans. To highlight the extent of this issue, a comprehensive search in the literature was conducted. The most common vibration criteria that may be used to assess the performance of steel-timber composite floors under human-induced vibrations were reviewed. For lightweight composite floors, the 1 kN deflection limit was found to be the most suitable vibration limit based on a wide range of subjective evaluation studies. For composite floors comprising steel and heavier timber subfloors, the relevance of 1 kN deflection criterion and other criteria suggested in the literature are questionable due to the lack of subjective evaluation studies. In the advent of advanced computing and data analysis, conducting detailed numerical analysis validated by accurate on-site measurements is recommended. Special attentions should be given to accurate estimation of connection stiffness and damping ratio according to the findings of this study.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:15:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a60e12661df41d5b482dd910ee207e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:15:19Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-7a60e12661df41d5b482dd910ee207e42023-11-24T13:41:09ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092022-11-011212206110.3390/buildings12122061Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite FloorsNajmeh Cheraghi-Shirazi0Keith Crews1Sardar Malek2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, CanadaSchool of Civil Engineering, Advanced Engineering Building, The University of Queensland, Staff House Road, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, AustraliaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, CanadaHuman comfort is recognized as an essential serviceability requirement for timber floors. Although several standards and design criteria are available for designing steel and concrete floors, there is no consensus among researchers on the applicability of such design methods to timber composite floors. Adding steel to timber floors is intended to create long spans, however, vibration is still a major challenge in achieving longer spans. To highlight the extent of this issue, a comprehensive search in the literature was conducted. The most common vibration criteria that may be used to assess the performance of steel-timber composite floors under human-induced vibrations were reviewed. For lightweight composite floors, the 1 kN deflection limit was found to be the most suitable vibration limit based on a wide range of subjective evaluation studies. For composite floors comprising steel and heavier timber subfloors, the relevance of 1 kN deflection criterion and other criteria suggested in the literature are questionable due to the lack of subjective evaluation studies. In the advent of advanced computing and data analysis, conducting detailed numerical analysis validated by accurate on-site measurements is recommended. Special attentions should be given to accurate estimation of connection stiffness and damping ratio according to the findings of this study.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/12/2061vibrationfinite element analysistimbersteelfrequencydeflection
spellingShingle Najmeh Cheraghi-Shirazi
Keith Crews
Sardar Malek
Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite Floors
Buildings
vibration
finite element analysis
timber
steel
frequency
deflection
title Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite Floors
title_full Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite Floors
title_fullStr Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite Floors
title_full_unstemmed Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite Floors
title_short Review of Vibration Assessment Methods for Steel-Timber Composite Floors
title_sort review of vibration assessment methods for steel timber composite floors
topic vibration
finite element analysis
timber
steel
frequency
deflection
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/12/2061
work_keys_str_mv AT najmehcheraghishirazi reviewofvibrationassessmentmethodsforsteeltimbercompositefloors
AT keithcrews reviewofvibrationassessmentmethodsforsteeltimbercompositefloors
AT sardarmalek reviewofvibrationassessmentmethodsforsteeltimbercompositefloors