Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal site

In this paper an analysis of different indirect methods for the calculation of the boundary layer height (BLH) using sodar, ultrasonic anemometer and a prognostic model based on single point surface measurements is presented. In particular the automatic spectral routine developed for Remtech sodar i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniele Contini, Danilea Cava, Paolo Martano, Antonio Donateo, Fabio M. Grasso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borntraeger 2009-06-01
Series:Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0381
_version_ 1797332575279120384
author Daniele Contini
Danilea Cava
Paolo Martano
Antonio Donateo
Fabio M. Grasso
author_facet Daniele Contini
Danilea Cava
Paolo Martano
Antonio Donateo
Fabio M. Grasso
author_sort Daniele Contini
collection DOAJ
description In this paper an analysis of different indirect methods for the calculation of the boundary layer height (BLH) using sodar, ultrasonic anemometer and a prognostic model based on single point surface measurements is presented. In particular the automatic spectral routine developed for Remtech sodar is compared with the results obtained with the parameterization of the vertical velocity variance of a minisodar, with the calculation of a prognostic model, with a parameterization based on horizontal velocity spectra and with the BLH evaluated from the intensity of minisodar echoes in stable conditions. The data of a radiosonde system taken in a nearby site was also analysed to get an independent evaluation of BLH for comparison. There is a significant scatter in the data for both the evaluation through the variance of vertical wind speed and the spectral analysis of the horizontal wind velocity although created by different effects. In unstable conditions the different methods give a similar pattern even if the prognostic model in some days predicts a significantly higher BLH with respect to the other methods. In stable nocturnal conditions the performances of the Remtech routine are worse than those in unstable conditions with an evident overestimation of the BLH that it is likely related to the overestimation of vertical turbulence and to the use of multiple range gates in the algorithm. Taking as reference the evaluation of BLH of the sodar, the spectral method applied to ultrasonic anemometer data seems to be affected by the lowest biases and it is a possible candidate, for the development of automatic routines for operational evaluation of BLH possibly with a different parameterisation for stable and unstable cases.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:51:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a6edd59612540b09720394ba67861b2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0941-2948
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T07:51:52Z
publishDate 2009-06-01
publisher Borntraeger
record_format Article
series Meteorologische Zeitschrift
spelling doaj.art-7a6edd59612540b09720394ba67861b22024-02-02T14:45:07ZengBorntraegerMeteorologische Zeitschrift0941-29482009-06-0118330932010.1127/0941-2948/2009/038173392Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal siteDaniele ContiniDanilea CavaPaolo MartanoAntonio DonateoFabio M. GrassoIn this paper an analysis of different indirect methods for the calculation of the boundary layer height (BLH) using sodar, ultrasonic anemometer and a prognostic model based on single point surface measurements is presented. In particular the automatic spectral routine developed for Remtech sodar is compared with the results obtained with the parameterization of the vertical velocity variance of a minisodar, with the calculation of a prognostic model, with a parameterization based on horizontal velocity spectra and with the BLH evaluated from the intensity of minisodar echoes in stable conditions. The data of a radiosonde system taken in a nearby site was also analysed to get an independent evaluation of BLH for comparison. There is a significant scatter in the data for both the evaluation through the variance of vertical wind speed and the spectral analysis of the horizontal wind velocity although created by different effects. In unstable conditions the different methods give a similar pattern even if the prognostic model in some days predicts a significantly higher BLH with respect to the other methods. In stable nocturnal conditions the performances of the Remtech routine are worse than those in unstable conditions with an evident overestimation of the BLH that it is likely related to the overestimation of vertical turbulence and to the use of multiple range gates in the algorithm. Taking as reference the evaluation of BLH of the sodar, the spectral method applied to ultrasonic anemometer data seems to be affected by the lowest biases and it is a possible candidate, for the development of automatic routines for operational evaluation of BLH possibly with a different parameterisation for stable and unstable cases.http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0381
spellingShingle Daniele Contini
Danilea Cava
Paolo Martano
Antonio Donateo
Fabio M. Grasso
Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal site
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
title Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal site
title_full Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal site
title_fullStr Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal site
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal site
title_short Comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of Boundary Layer height over flat-terrain in a coastal site
title_sort comparison of indirect methods for the estimation of boundary layer height over flat terrain in a coastal site
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0381
work_keys_str_mv AT danielecontini comparisonofindirectmethodsfortheestimationofboundarylayerheightoverflatterraininacoastalsite
AT danileacava comparisonofindirectmethodsfortheestimationofboundarylayerheightoverflatterraininacoastalsite
AT paolomartano comparisonofindirectmethodsfortheestimationofboundarylayerheightoverflatterraininacoastalsite
AT antoniodonateo comparisonofindirectmethodsfortheestimationofboundarylayerheightoverflatterraininacoastalsite
AT fabiomgrasso comparisonofindirectmethodsfortheestimationofboundarylayerheightoverflatterraininacoastalsite