Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review

Background:. Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury is often suboptimal despite the intrinsic permissive growth environment of the peripheral nervous system. The objective of this systematic review is to explore the use of electrical stimulation (ES) for peripheral nerve regeneration. Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rawan ElAbd, MD, Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, MD, FRCS(C), Salman AlSabah, MD, FRCS (C), FACS, Jessica Hazan, MD, Becher Alhalabi, MD FRCS(C), Stephanie Thibaudeau, MD, FRCS(C)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2022-03-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004115
_version_ 1818307906276163584
author Rawan ElAbd, MD
Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, MD, FRCS(C)
Salman AlSabah, MD, FRCS (C), FACS
Jessica Hazan, MD
Becher Alhalabi, MD FRCS(C)
Stephanie Thibaudeau, MD, FRCS(C)
author_facet Rawan ElAbd, MD
Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, MD, FRCS(C)
Salman AlSabah, MD, FRCS (C), FACS
Jessica Hazan, MD
Becher Alhalabi, MD FRCS(C)
Stephanie Thibaudeau, MD, FRCS(C)
author_sort Rawan ElAbd, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury is often suboptimal despite the intrinsic permissive growth environment of the peripheral nervous system. The objective of this systematic review is to explore the use of electrical stimulation (ES) for peripheral nerve regeneration. Methods:. A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to March 2, 2021 to retrieve articles on ES for peripheral nerve regeneration using the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Primary outcome measures included objective measures of motor and sensory nerve function. Results:. Four randomized control trials, two case reports, and three case series that addressed the aims were identified. The stimulation parameters varied greatly between studies, without an apparent commonality for a given electrical conduit. Outcomes measured included motor (n = 8) and sensory (n = 7) modalities (cold detection, static two-point discrimination, tactile discrimination, and pressure detection), nerve-specific muscle function and bulk, and electromyography (EMG) motor and sensory terminal latency. Different parameters for measurement were utilized and improvement was observed across the studies compared with controls (n = 4) or pre-intervention measurements (n = 5). One randomized control trial reported no benefit of ES and attributed their findings to their stimulation protocol. Complications were documented in three patients only and included wire remnant removal, skin pigmentation, and bone formation. Conclusions:. ES in peripheral nerve regeneration is beneficial in improving and accelerating recovery. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity, but all studies showed positive findings and minor to no complications. These results provide a primer for further development of delivery methods.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T07:05:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a77d786628a4744834f63be9421d44c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-7574
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T07:05:49Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj.art-7a77d786628a4744834f63be9421d44c2022-12-21T23:55:49ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742022-03-01103e411510.1097/GOX.0000000000004115202203000-00037Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic ReviewRawan ElAbd, MD0Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, MD, FRCS(C)1Salman AlSabah, MD, FRCS (C), FACS2Jessica Hazan, MD3Becher Alhalabi, MD FRCS(C)4Stephanie Thibaudeau, MD, FRCS(C)5From the * Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait† Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, CanadaFrom the * Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait† Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada† Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada† Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, CanadaBackground:. Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury is often suboptimal despite the intrinsic permissive growth environment of the peripheral nervous system. The objective of this systematic review is to explore the use of electrical stimulation (ES) for peripheral nerve regeneration. Methods:. A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to March 2, 2021 to retrieve articles on ES for peripheral nerve regeneration using the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Primary outcome measures included objective measures of motor and sensory nerve function. Results:. Four randomized control trials, two case reports, and three case series that addressed the aims were identified. The stimulation parameters varied greatly between studies, without an apparent commonality for a given electrical conduit. Outcomes measured included motor (n = 8) and sensory (n = 7) modalities (cold detection, static two-point discrimination, tactile discrimination, and pressure detection), nerve-specific muscle function and bulk, and electromyography (EMG) motor and sensory terminal latency. Different parameters for measurement were utilized and improvement was observed across the studies compared with controls (n = 4) or pre-intervention measurements (n = 5). One randomized control trial reported no benefit of ES and attributed their findings to their stimulation protocol. Complications were documented in three patients only and included wire remnant removal, skin pigmentation, and bone formation. Conclusions:. ES in peripheral nerve regeneration is beneficial in improving and accelerating recovery. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity, but all studies showed positive findings and minor to no complications. These results provide a primer for further development of delivery methods.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004115
spellingShingle Rawan ElAbd, MD
Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, MD, FRCS(C)
Salman AlSabah, MD, FRCS (C), FACS
Jessica Hazan, MD
Becher Alhalabi, MD FRCS(C)
Stephanie Thibaudeau, MD, FRCS(C)
Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review
title_full Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review
title_short Role of Electrical Stimulation in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review
title_sort role of electrical stimulation in peripheral nerve regeneration a systematic review
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004115
work_keys_str_mv AT rawanelabdmd roleofelectricalstimulationinperipheralnerveregenerationasystematicreview
AT abdulazizalabdulkarimmdfrcsc roleofelectricalstimulationinperipheralnerveregenerationasystematicreview
AT salmanalsabahmdfrcscfacs roleofelectricalstimulationinperipheralnerveregenerationasystematicreview
AT jessicahazanmd roleofelectricalstimulationinperipheralnerveregenerationasystematicreview
AT becheralhalabimdfrcsc roleofelectricalstimulationinperipheralnerveregenerationasystematicreview
AT stephaniethibaudeaumdfrcsc roleofelectricalstimulationinperipheralnerveregenerationasystematicreview