Effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur

We report on a simple experiment in which the thickness of a hyperdoped silicon layer, supersaturated with sulfur by ion implantation followed by pulsed laser melting and rapid solidification, is systematically varied at constant average sulfur concentration, by varying the implantation energy, dose...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Hutchinson, Jay Mathews, Joseph T. Sullivan, Austin Akey, Michael J. Aziz, Tonio Buonassisi, Peter Persans, Jeffrey M. Warrender
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing LLC 2016-05-01
Series:AIP Advances
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4948986
_version_ 1828279818666377216
author David Hutchinson
Jay Mathews
Joseph T. Sullivan
Austin Akey
Michael J. Aziz
Tonio Buonassisi
Peter Persans
Jeffrey M. Warrender
author_facet David Hutchinson
Jay Mathews
Joseph T. Sullivan
Austin Akey
Michael J. Aziz
Tonio Buonassisi
Peter Persans
Jeffrey M. Warrender
author_sort David Hutchinson
collection DOAJ
description We report on a simple experiment in which the thickness of a hyperdoped silicon layer, supersaturated with sulfur by ion implantation followed by pulsed laser melting and rapid solidification, is systematically varied at constant average sulfur concentration, by varying the implantation energy, dose, and laser fluence. Contacts are deposited and the external quantum efficiency (EQE) is measured for visible wavelengths. We posit that the sulfur layer primarily absorbs light but contributes negligible photocurrent, and we seek to support this by analyzing the EQE data for the different layer thicknesses in two interlocking ways. In the first, we use the measured concentration depth profiles to obtain the approximate layer thicknesses, and, for each wavelength, fit the EQE vs. layer thickness curve to obtain the absorption coefficient of hyperdoped silicon for that wavelength. Comparison to literature values for the hyperdoped silicon absorption coefficients [S.H. Pan et al. Applied Physics Letters 98, 121913 (2011)] shows good agreement. Next, we essentially run this process in reverse; we fit with Beer’s law the curves of EQE vs. hyperdoped silicon absorption coefficient for those wavelengths that are primarily absorbed in the hyperdoped silicon layer, and find that the layer thicknesses obtained from the fit are in good agreement with the original values obtained from the depth profiles. We conclude that the data support our interpretation of the hyperdoped silicon layer as providing negligible photocurrent at high S concentrations. This work validates the absorption data of Pan et al. [Applied Physics Letters 98, 121913 (2011)], and is consistent with reports of short mobility-lifetime products in hyperdoped layers. It suggests that for optoelectronic devices containing hyperdoped layers, the most important contribution to the above band gap photoresponse may be due to photons absorbed below the hyperdoped layer.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:50:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a79311e2a6645b2873d286b2392463c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-3226
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:50:26Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
record_format Article
series AIP Advances
spelling doaj.art-7a79311e2a6645b2873d286b2392463c2022-12-22T02:55:34ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262016-05-0165055307055307-710.1063/1.4948986028605ADVEffect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfurDavid Hutchinson0Jay Mathews1Joseph T. Sullivan2Austin Akey3Michael J. Aziz4Tonio Buonassisi5Peter Persans6Jeffrey M. Warrender7Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180, USAUS Army ARDEC – Benét Laboratories, Watervliet NY 12189, USASchool of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139, USASchool of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139, USAHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge MA 02138, USASchool of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139, USADepartment of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180, USAUS Army ARDEC – Benét Laboratories, Watervliet NY 12189, USAWe report on a simple experiment in which the thickness of a hyperdoped silicon layer, supersaturated with sulfur by ion implantation followed by pulsed laser melting and rapid solidification, is systematically varied at constant average sulfur concentration, by varying the implantation energy, dose, and laser fluence. Contacts are deposited and the external quantum efficiency (EQE) is measured for visible wavelengths. We posit that the sulfur layer primarily absorbs light but contributes negligible photocurrent, and we seek to support this by analyzing the EQE data for the different layer thicknesses in two interlocking ways. In the first, we use the measured concentration depth profiles to obtain the approximate layer thicknesses, and, for each wavelength, fit the EQE vs. layer thickness curve to obtain the absorption coefficient of hyperdoped silicon for that wavelength. Comparison to literature values for the hyperdoped silicon absorption coefficients [S.H. Pan et al. Applied Physics Letters 98, 121913 (2011)] shows good agreement. Next, we essentially run this process in reverse; we fit with Beer’s law the curves of EQE vs. hyperdoped silicon absorption coefficient for those wavelengths that are primarily absorbed in the hyperdoped silicon layer, and find that the layer thicknesses obtained from the fit are in good agreement with the original values obtained from the depth profiles. We conclude that the data support our interpretation of the hyperdoped silicon layer as providing negligible photocurrent at high S concentrations. This work validates the absorption data of Pan et al. [Applied Physics Letters 98, 121913 (2011)], and is consistent with reports of short mobility-lifetime products in hyperdoped layers. It suggests that for optoelectronic devices containing hyperdoped layers, the most important contribution to the above band gap photoresponse may be due to photons absorbed below the hyperdoped layer.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4948986
spellingShingle David Hutchinson
Jay Mathews
Joseph T. Sullivan
Austin Akey
Michael J. Aziz
Tonio Buonassisi
Peter Persans
Jeffrey M. Warrender
Effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur
AIP Advances
title Effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur
title_full Effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur
title_fullStr Effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur
title_full_unstemmed Effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur
title_short Effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur
title_sort effect of layer thickness on device response of silicon heavily supersaturated with sulfur
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4948986
work_keys_str_mv AT davidhutchinson effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur
AT jaymathews effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur
AT josephtsullivan effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur
AT austinakey effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur
AT michaeljaziz effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur
AT toniobuonassisi effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur
AT peterpersans effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur
AT jeffreymwarrender effectoflayerthicknessondeviceresponseofsiliconheavilysupersaturatedwithsulfur