The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: The American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological stage T4 designation is not warranted
Main Author: | Athanase Billis |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2009-12-01
|
Series: | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000600018 |
Similar Items
-
The bladder neck preservation in robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Surgical and pathological outcome
by: Michele Zazzara, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Skeletal muscle involvement by limited Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy is not associated with adverse findings at radical prostatectomy
by: Athanase Billis
Published: (2010-12-01) -
To Spare or not to Spare? Bladder Neck and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
by: Murat KESKE, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Systematic review of studies reporting positive surgical margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy
by: Bellangino, M, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy
by: Jonathan L. Silberstein, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)