La mesure comme représentation de l’objet

In this article we examine the status and the role of interpretation in the measurement process, from the point of view of mixed methods. Starting with Abraham Kaplan’s definition of “measurement as the assignment of numbers to objects (or events or situations) in accord with some rule defining prop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jules Duchastel, Danielle Laberge
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Internationale des Sociologues de Langue Française 2011-04-01
Series:Sociologies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/3435
_version_ 1818258037104705536
author Jules Duchastel
Danielle Laberge
author_facet Jules Duchastel
Danielle Laberge
author_sort Jules Duchastel
collection DOAJ
description In this article we examine the status and the role of interpretation in the measurement process, from the point of view of mixed methods. Starting with Abraham Kaplan’s definition of “measurement as the assignment of numbers to objects (or events or situations) in accord with some rule defining properties that can be quantified”, we state that measurement is produced through a set of different interpretations at various moments during the research process. It cannot be seen only as a reduction of complexity and a quantification of reality since it is also a way of restoring complexity and quality. Measurement must be understood in relation with all the other knowledge operations.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T17:53:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a8818d9e2834742a771ca6b5c8e8076
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1992-2655
language fra
last_indexed 2024-12-12T17:53:10Z
publishDate 2011-04-01
publisher Association Internationale des Sociologues de Langue Française
record_format Article
series Sociologies
spelling doaj.art-7a8818d9e2834742a771ca6b5c8e80762022-12-22T00:16:46ZfraAssociation Internationale des Sociologues de Langue FrançaiseSociologies1992-26552011-04-01La mesure comme représentation de l’objetJules DuchastelDanielle LabergeIn this article we examine the status and the role of interpretation in the measurement process, from the point of view of mixed methods. Starting with Abraham Kaplan’s definition of “measurement as the assignment of numbers to objects (or events or situations) in accord with some rule defining properties that can be quantified”, we state that measurement is produced through a set of different interpretations at various moments during the research process. It cannot be seen only as a reduction of complexity and a quantification of reality since it is also a way of restoring complexity and quality. Measurement must be understood in relation with all the other knowledge operations.http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/3435qualitative approachquantitative approachcomplexityinterpretationmixed methodologysociology of knowledge
spellingShingle Jules Duchastel
Danielle Laberge
La mesure comme représentation de l’objet
Sociologies
qualitative approach
quantitative approach
complexity
interpretation
mixed methodology
sociology of knowledge
title La mesure comme représentation de l’objet
title_full La mesure comme représentation de l’objet
title_fullStr La mesure comme représentation de l’objet
title_full_unstemmed La mesure comme représentation de l’objet
title_short La mesure comme représentation de l’objet
title_sort la mesure comme representation de l objet
topic qualitative approach
quantitative approach
complexity
interpretation
mixed methodology
sociology of knowledge
url http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/3435
work_keys_str_mv AT julesduchastel lamesurecommerepresentationdelobjet
AT daniellelaberge lamesurecommerepresentationdelobjet