Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in Alaska
Several studies of U.S. National Forests suggest that declines of their associated forest products industries were driven by synergistic changes in federal governance and market conditions during the late 20th century. In Alaska, dramatic shifts in the economic and political settings of the Tongass...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2011-03-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art40/ |
| _version_ | 1819122109294575616 |
|---|---|
| author | Colin Beier |
| author_facet | Colin Beier |
| author_sort | Colin Beier |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Several studies of U.S. National Forests suggest that declines of their associated forest products industries were driven by synergistic changes in federal governance and market conditions during the late 20th century. In Alaska, dramatic shifts in the economic and political settings of the Tongass National Forest (Tongass) drove changes in governance leading to collapse of an industrial forest management system in the early 1990s. However, 15 years since collapse, the reorganization of Tongass governance to reflect 'new' economic and political realities has not progressed. To understand both the factors that hinder institutional change (inertia) and the factors that enable progress toward reorganization (adaptation), I analyzed how Tongass forest management, specifically timber sale planning, has responded to changes in market conditions, local industry structure, and larger-scale political governance. Inertia was evidenced by continued emphasis on even-aged management and large-scale harvesting, i.e., the retention of an industrial forestry philosophy that, in the current political situation, yields mostly litigation and appeals, and relatively few forest products. Adaptation was evidenced by flexibility in harvest methods, a willingness to meet local demand instead of political targets, and a growing degree of cooperation with environmental advocacy groups. New partnerships, markets, and political leaders at state and national levels can frame a new blueprint for reorganization of Tongass management toward a more sustainable future. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T06:47:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7a8c6f14d32e4be9a3439c0ff004f13b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1708-3087 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T06:47:14Z |
| publishDate | 2011-03-01 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Society |
| spelling | doaj.art-7a8c6f14d32e4be9a3439c0ff004f13b2022-12-21T18:35:15ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872011-03-011614010.5751/ES-03822-1601403822Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in AlaskaColin Beier0SUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestrySeveral studies of U.S. National Forests suggest that declines of their associated forest products industries were driven by synergistic changes in federal governance and market conditions during the late 20th century. In Alaska, dramatic shifts in the economic and political settings of the Tongass National Forest (Tongass) drove changes in governance leading to collapse of an industrial forest management system in the early 1990s. However, 15 years since collapse, the reorganization of Tongass governance to reflect 'new' economic and political realities has not progressed. To understand both the factors that hinder institutional change (inertia) and the factors that enable progress toward reorganization (adaptation), I analyzed how Tongass forest management, specifically timber sale planning, has responded to changes in market conditions, local industry structure, and larger-scale political governance. Inertia was evidenced by continued emphasis on even-aged management and large-scale harvesting, i.e., the retention of an industrial forestry philosophy that, in the current political situation, yields mostly litigation and appeals, and relatively few forest products. Adaptation was evidenced by flexibility in harvest methods, a willingness to meet local demand instead of political targets, and a growing degree of cooperation with environmental advocacy groups. New partnerships, markets, and political leaders at state and national levels can frame a new blueprint for reorganization of Tongass management toward a more sustainable future.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art40/forest managementinertiaorganizational changerigidity trapstimber sale planningTongass National Forest |
| spellingShingle | Colin Beier Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in Alaska Ecology and Society forest management inertia organizational change rigidity traps timber sale planning Tongass National Forest |
| title | Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in Alaska |
| title_full | Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in Alaska |
| title_fullStr | Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in Alaska |
| title_full_unstemmed | Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in Alaska |
| title_short | Factors Influencing Adaptive Capacity in the Reorganization of Forest Management in Alaska |
| title_sort | factors influencing adaptive capacity in the reorganization of forest management in alaska |
| topic | forest management inertia organizational change rigidity traps timber sale planning Tongass National Forest |
| url | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art40/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT colinbeier factorsinfluencingadaptivecapacityinthereorganizationofforestmanagementinalaska |