Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Laparoscopic exploration is currently considered the gold standard for managing nonpalpable intraabdominal testes. The problem of short vascular pedicle is addressed in Fowler-Stephen (FS) technique by the division of testicular vessels and in Shehata technique (ST) by traction on testic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nitinkumar Bhajandas Borkar, Charu Tiwari, Debajyoti Mohanty, Deepti Vepakomma, Nilesh Nagdeve
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2024;volume=16;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=Borkar
_version_ 1797246038263726080
author Nitinkumar Bhajandas Borkar
Charu Tiwari
Debajyoti Mohanty
Deepti Vepakomma
Nilesh Nagdeve
author_facet Nitinkumar Bhajandas Borkar
Charu Tiwari
Debajyoti Mohanty
Deepti Vepakomma
Nilesh Nagdeve
author_sort Nitinkumar Bhajandas Borkar
collection DOAJ
description Background: Laparoscopic exploration is currently considered the gold standard for managing nonpalpable intraabdominal testes. The problem of short vascular pedicle is addressed in Fowler-Stephen (FS) technique by the division of testicular vessels and in Shehata technique (ST) by traction on testicular vessels. There is a lack of the consensus among pediatric surgeons on the choice of one technique over other. This analysis compares the reported outcomes of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy by ST with the time tested FS technique in managing high intraabdominal undescended testis. Materials and Methods: The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as per the preferred reporting items for the systematic review and meta-analyses guidelines. Only randomized controlled trials and comparative studies were included. The primary outcomes compared were the incidence of testicular atrophy, testicular retraction/ascent rate, and operative time of Stage I and Stage II orchidopexy. Results: The present analysis was based on three randomized studies with a total of 119 undescended testes in 117 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria. The operative time was less in Stage I FS technique; however, there was no statistically significant difference in operative time of both procedures during the Stage II laparoscopic orchidopexy. Pooled analysis of postintervention testicular atrophy, testicular retraction rate, and duration of postoperative hospitalization showed no difference between both procedures. Conclusion: Both FS and STs are comparable in terms of postintervention testicular atrophy, testicular retraction/ascent; however, the mean operative time is significantly less with FS technique in Stage I laparoscopic orchidopexy.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:36:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7a91f5cecb004b068942039bd7888858
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:36:26Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Urology Annals
spelling doaj.art-7a91f5cecb004b068942039bd78888582024-03-25T13:07:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342024-01-01161647010.4103/ua.ua_11_23Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysisNitinkumar Bhajandas BorkarCharu TiwariDebajyoti MohantyDeepti VepakommaNilesh NagdeveBackground: Laparoscopic exploration is currently considered the gold standard for managing nonpalpable intraabdominal testes. The problem of short vascular pedicle is addressed in Fowler-Stephen (FS) technique by the division of testicular vessels and in Shehata technique (ST) by traction on testicular vessels. There is a lack of the consensus among pediatric surgeons on the choice of one technique over other. This analysis compares the reported outcomes of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy by ST with the time tested FS technique in managing high intraabdominal undescended testis. Materials and Methods: The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as per the preferred reporting items for the systematic review and meta-analyses guidelines. Only randomized controlled trials and comparative studies were included. The primary outcomes compared were the incidence of testicular atrophy, testicular retraction/ascent rate, and operative time of Stage I and Stage II orchidopexy. Results: The present analysis was based on three randomized studies with a total of 119 undescended testes in 117 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria. The operative time was less in Stage I FS technique; however, there was no statistically significant difference in operative time of both procedures during the Stage II laparoscopic orchidopexy. Pooled analysis of postintervention testicular atrophy, testicular retraction rate, and duration of postoperative hospitalization showed no difference between both procedures. Conclusion: Both FS and STs are comparable in terms of postintervention testicular atrophy, testicular retraction/ascent; however, the mean operative time is significantly less with FS technique in Stage I laparoscopic orchidopexy.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2024;volume=16;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=Borkarintra-abdominallaparoscopicorchidopexystagedtechniquesundescended testes
spellingShingle Nitinkumar Bhajandas Borkar
Charu Tiwari
Debajyoti Mohanty
Deepti Vepakomma
Nilesh Nagdeve
Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Urology Annals
intra-abdominal
laparoscopic
orchidopexy
staged
techniques
undescended testes
title Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra-abdominal testes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort techniques of staged laparoscopic orchidopexy for high intra abdominal testes in children a systematic review and meta analysis
topic intra-abdominal
laparoscopic
orchidopexy
staged
techniques
undescended testes
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2024;volume=16;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=Borkar
work_keys_str_mv AT nitinkumarbhajandasborkar techniquesofstagedlaparoscopicorchidopexyforhighintraabdominaltestesinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT charutiwari techniquesofstagedlaparoscopicorchidopexyforhighintraabdominaltestesinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT debajyotimohanty techniquesofstagedlaparoscopicorchidopexyforhighintraabdominaltestesinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT deeptivepakomma techniquesofstagedlaparoscopicorchidopexyforhighintraabdominaltestesinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nileshnagdeve techniquesofstagedlaparoscopicorchidopexyforhighintraabdominaltestesinchildrenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis