Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation Study

<i>Objective:</i> The aim of this study was to allow researchers to evaluate the Periotest device as a reproducible tool that can be trusted to carry out accurately reproducible and comparable tooth mobility readings. <i>Methods:</i> A reproducibility test was initially condu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olga Gerasimidou, Timothy F. Watson, Brian J. Millar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/5/1860
_version_ 1797264851837386752
author Olga Gerasimidou
Timothy F. Watson
Brian J. Millar
author_facet Olga Gerasimidou
Timothy F. Watson
Brian J. Millar
author_sort Olga Gerasimidou
collection DOAJ
description <i>Objective:</i> The aim of this study was to allow researchers to evaluate the Periotest device as a reproducible tool that can be trusted to carry out accurately reproducible and comparable tooth mobility readings. <i>Methods:</i> A reproducibility test was initially conducted taking Periotest recordings for #16 every 10 min with 1 min intervals. Each time, three readings were recorded, and the average of the three was noted. This was followed by recordings for three different subject groups varying in age that were seen three times in 4 weeks, with 2-week intervals between each appointment; recordings were taken of #11, #13 and #16. Nonparametric analysis using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was carried out. <i>Results:</i> For the reproducibility test, the values of all three readings for each recording session were either exactly the same or differed by up to ±2 Periotest value units. <i>p</i>-value results in the three patient groups showed no significant difference in Periotest values between appointments, with the minor exception of #16 in all three groups, but this was well within the limits of error of the device. <i>Conclusions:</i> Analysis of the Periotest readings in this study indicates that positive (higher) Periotest values correspond to increased tooth mobility.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T00:35:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7aa23b20dc024af2a569615044329cd5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:35:28Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-7aa23b20dc024af2a569615044329cd52024-03-12T16:39:15ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172024-02-01145186010.3390/app14051860Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation StudyOlga Gerasimidou0Timothy F. Watson1Brian J. Millar2Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Agiou Dimitriou, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceCentre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Tower, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 1UL, UKDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, King’s College London, King’s College Hospital, Caldecot Road, London SE5 9RW, UK<i>Objective:</i> The aim of this study was to allow researchers to evaluate the Periotest device as a reproducible tool that can be trusted to carry out accurately reproducible and comparable tooth mobility readings. <i>Methods:</i> A reproducibility test was initially conducted taking Periotest recordings for #16 every 10 min with 1 min intervals. Each time, three readings were recorded, and the average of the three was noted. This was followed by recordings for three different subject groups varying in age that were seen three times in 4 weeks, with 2-week intervals between each appointment; recordings were taken of #11, #13 and #16. Nonparametric analysis using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was carried out. <i>Results:</i> For the reproducibility test, the values of all three readings for each recording session were either exactly the same or differed by up to ±2 Periotest value units. <i>p</i>-value results in the three patient groups showed no significant difference in Periotest values between appointments, with the minor exception of #16 in all three groups, but this was well within the limits of error of the device. <i>Conclusions:</i> Analysis of the Periotest readings in this study indicates that positive (higher) Periotest values correspond to increased tooth mobility.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/5/1860dentistrytooth mobilityocclusionPeriotest
spellingShingle Olga Gerasimidou
Timothy F. Watson
Brian J. Millar
Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation Study
Applied Sciences
dentistry
tooth mobility
occlusion
Periotest
title Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation Study
title_full Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation Study
title_short Evaluation of the Periotest Device as an Objective Measuring Tool for Tooth Mobility—A Clinical Evaluation Study
title_sort evaluation of the periotest device as an objective measuring tool for tooth mobility a clinical evaluation study
topic dentistry
tooth mobility
occlusion
Periotest
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/5/1860
work_keys_str_mv AT olgagerasimidou evaluationoftheperiotestdeviceasanobjectivemeasuringtoolfortoothmobilityaclinicalevaluationstudy
AT timothyfwatson evaluationoftheperiotestdeviceasanobjectivemeasuringtoolfortoothmobilityaclinicalevaluationstudy
AT brianjmillar evaluationoftheperiotestdeviceasanobjectivemeasuringtoolfortoothmobilityaclinicalevaluationstudy