PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCE

Objective: to study corruption prevention as administrative activity of state and municipal authorities.Methods: dialectical, systematic, formal-legal analysis, synthesis, statistical and specific sociological methods.Results: basing on the study of counter-corruption legislation, its implementation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: T. L. Kozlov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. 2017-03-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2057
_version_ 1826928582592561152
author T. L. Kozlov
author_facet T. L. Kozlov
author_sort T. L. Kozlov
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to study corruption prevention as administrative activity of state and municipal authorities.Methods: dialectical, systematic, formal-legal analysis, synthesis, statistical and specific sociological methods.Results: basing on the study of counter-corruption legislation, its implementation, and acts of prosecutorial response, the definition of the concept "corruption prevention" was formulated, which refers to administrative activities of state and municipal bodies and their officials aimed at the implementation of legislation on combating corruption. The feature of the preventive component of counter-corruption legislation is that it brings together the complex of binding, prohibitive and restrictive rules established for the prevention of corruption. Corruption prevention is implemented through a specific type of managerial (administrative) activity. The legality of this activity is provided by means of prosecutorial supervision over implementation of laws on corruption prevention.Scientific novelty: for the first time in the article corruption prevention is viewed not as a criminological category but as an institution of administrative law, characterized by the essential features of the state (municipal) control.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in research and law-enforcement activities in addressing issues related to combating corruption.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:15:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7aa4c9b5ebb74421a0120cfbe78df7d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2782-2923
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-17T15:51:45Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Economics and Law
spelling doaj.art-7aa4c9b5ebb74421a0120cfbe78df7d02024-12-18T11:47:02ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232017-03-0111117017910.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.1.170-1792055PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCET. L. Kozlov0Crimean Juridical Faculty (branch) of Academy of Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian FederationObjective: to study corruption prevention as administrative activity of state and municipal authorities.Methods: dialectical, systematic, formal-legal analysis, synthesis, statistical and specific sociological methods.Results: basing on the study of counter-corruption legislation, its implementation, and acts of prosecutorial response, the definition of the concept "corruption prevention" was formulated, which refers to administrative activities of state and municipal bodies and their officials aimed at the implementation of legislation on combating corruption. The feature of the preventive component of counter-corruption legislation is that it brings together the complex of binding, prohibitive and restrictive rules established for the prevention of corruption. Corruption prevention is implemented through a specific type of managerial (administrative) activity. The legality of this activity is provided by means of prosecutorial supervision over implementation of laws on corruption prevention.Scientific novelty: for the first time in the article corruption prevention is viewed not as a criminological category but as an institution of administrative law, characterized by the essential features of the state (municipal) control.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in research and law-enforcement activities in addressing issues related to combating corruption.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2057court powerprosecutor’s activity, corruptioncorruption preventionadministrative activityprosecutor’s authoritiesprosecutorial supervision
spellingShingle T. L. Kozlov
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCE
Russian Journal of Economics and Law
court power
prosecutor’s activity, corruption
corruption prevention
administrative activity
prosecutor’s authorities
prosecutorial supervision
title PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCE
title_full PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCE
title_fullStr PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCE
title_full_unstemmed PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCE
title_short PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY OF AUTHORITIES AND THE OBJECT OF PROSECUTOR’S OBSERVANCE
title_sort prevention of corruption as administrative activity of authorities and the object of prosecutor s observance
topic court power
prosecutor’s activity, corruption
corruption prevention
administrative activity
prosecutor’s authorities
prosecutorial supervision
url https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2057
work_keys_str_mv AT tlkozlov preventionofcorruptionasadministrativeactivityofauthoritiesandtheobjectofprosecutorsobservance