Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?

Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pavel Mohr, Jirí Masopust, Miloslav Kopeček
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946/full
_version_ 1798024675063758848
author Pavel Mohr
Pavel Mohr
Jirí Masopust
Miloslav Kopeček
Miloslav Kopeček
author_facet Pavel Mohr
Pavel Mohr
Jirí Masopust
Miloslav Kopeček
Miloslav Kopeček
author_sort Pavel Mohr
collection DOAJ
description Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsychotic efficacy of all three drugs was established in several placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in schizophrenia, both acute phase and relapse prevention. In addition, each of the DRPA agents has been tested in other psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder or major depression. However, a few studies have examined their comparative clinical efficacy. There are no head-to-head comparisons between aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, or cariprazine. In two acute schizophrenia RCTs of cariprazine and brexpiprazole, aripiprazole was used as an indirect comparator to control for study sensitivity. To assess potential differences in the efficacy of DRPAs, we reviewed data from controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Our results showed that the acute antipsychotic effects of DRPAs, as measured by the number needed to treat, are comparable. The three agents were superior to placebo in acute treatment, and cariprazine was found to be effective in the reduction of primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the therapy of bipolar disorder, aripiprazole and cariprazine showed antimanic efficacy, cariprazine was also effective in the management of bipolar depression, and aripiprazole was effective for relapse prevention. The addon administration of aripiprazole or brexpiprazole reduced symptoms of major depression. Aripiprazole can control acute agitation associated with psychosis or bipolar disorder; brexpiprazole showed the potential to manage agitation in dementia patients. Aripiprazole has also established evidence of efficacy in children and adolescents and other conditions: OCD, tic disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. Our review of published data suggests that in terms of clinical efficacy, DRPAs are a heterogeneous group, with each drug possessing its own therapeutic benefits.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:06:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7aaa618d31094b61832604d277a5bf65
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:06:29Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-7aaa618d31094b61832604d277a5bf652022-12-22T04:10:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402022-01-011210.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946781946Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?Pavel Mohr0Pavel Mohr1Jirí Masopust2Miloslav Kopeček3Miloslav Kopeček4National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, CzechiaFaculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaPsychiatric Clinic of the University Hospital Hradec Kràlové, Charles University, Hradec Kràlové, CzechiaNational Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, CzechiaFaculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaDopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsychotic efficacy of all three drugs was established in several placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in schizophrenia, both acute phase and relapse prevention. In addition, each of the DRPA agents has been tested in other psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder or major depression. However, a few studies have examined their comparative clinical efficacy. There are no head-to-head comparisons between aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, or cariprazine. In two acute schizophrenia RCTs of cariprazine and brexpiprazole, aripiprazole was used as an indirect comparator to control for study sensitivity. To assess potential differences in the efficacy of DRPAs, we reviewed data from controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Our results showed that the acute antipsychotic effects of DRPAs, as measured by the number needed to treat, are comparable. The three agents were superior to placebo in acute treatment, and cariprazine was found to be effective in the reduction of primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the therapy of bipolar disorder, aripiprazole and cariprazine showed antimanic efficacy, cariprazine was also effective in the management of bipolar depression, and aripiprazole was effective for relapse prevention. The addon administration of aripiprazole or brexpiprazole reduced symptoms of major depression. Aripiprazole can control acute agitation associated with psychosis or bipolar disorder; brexpiprazole showed the potential to manage agitation in dementia patients. Aripiprazole has also established evidence of efficacy in children and adolescents and other conditions: OCD, tic disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. Our review of published data suggests that in terms of clinical efficacy, DRPAs are a heterogeneous group, with each drug possessing its own therapeutic benefits.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946/fullantipsychoticsdopamine partial agonistsaripiprazolebrexpiprazolecariprazineclinical efficacy
spellingShingle Pavel Mohr
Pavel Mohr
Jirí Masopust
Miloslav Kopeček
Miloslav Kopeček
Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
Frontiers in Psychiatry
antipsychotics
dopamine partial agonists
aripiprazole
brexpiprazole
cariprazine
clinical efficacy
title Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_full Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_fullStr Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_full_unstemmed Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_short Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_sort dopamine receptor partial agonists do they differ in their clinical efficacy
topic antipsychotics
dopamine partial agonists
aripiprazole
brexpiprazole
cariprazine
clinical efficacy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelmohr dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy
AT pavelmohr dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy
AT jirimasopust dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy
AT miloslavkopecek dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy
AT miloslavkopecek dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy