Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures

Grasslands in the Southern Great Plains of the United States have major ecological and economic importance, with strong climate and water cycle connections. The historic native prairie grassland has been managed differently for enhancing productivity, while consequently altering water vapor fluxes....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajen Bajgain, Xiangming Xiao, Pradeep Wagle, John S. Kimball, Colin Brust, Jeffrey B. Basara, Prasanna Gowda, Patrick J. Starks, James P. S. Neel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/1/82
_version_ 1797543238175817728
author Rajen Bajgain
Xiangming Xiao
Pradeep Wagle
John S. Kimball
Colin Brust
Jeffrey B. Basara
Prasanna Gowda
Patrick J. Starks
James P. S. Neel
author_facet Rajen Bajgain
Xiangming Xiao
Pradeep Wagle
John S. Kimball
Colin Brust
Jeffrey B. Basara
Prasanna Gowda
Patrick J. Starks
James P. S. Neel
author_sort Rajen Bajgain
collection DOAJ
description Grasslands in the Southern Great Plains of the United States have major ecological and economic importance, with strong climate and water cycle connections. The historic native prairie grassland has been managed differently for enhancing productivity, while consequently altering water vapor fluxes. However, little is known about the impacts of different management activities on evapotranspiration (ET) at different spatio-temporal scales. In this study, we quantified and compared ET between co-located introduced managed pasture (MP) and native prairie (NP) pasture. Additionally, we compared the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived ET at four different spatial scales: 30 m (ET<sub>MOD30</sub>), 200 m (ET<sub>MOD200</sub>), 500 m (ET<sub>MOD500</sub>), and 1000 m (ET<sub>MOD1000</sub>) with eddy covariance-measured ET (ET<sub>EC</sub>). Large differences in ET<sub>EC</sub> were observed between two pastures from half-hourly to seasonal scales, with variations mainly controlled by the amount of rainfall and management activities. The results demonstrated differential responses of MP and NP in a pluvial year. The ET<sub>MOD30</sub> showed a better agreement with ET<sub>EC</sub> than did the ET<sub>MOD200</sub>, ET<sub>MOD500</sub>, and ET<sub>MOD1000</sub>. The ET<sub>MOD200</sub>, ET<sub>MOD500</sub>, and ET<sub>MOD1000</sub> largely underestimated ET<sub>EC</sub>, most likely due to their inability to capture the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation growth impacted by various management activities. Our results facilitate understanding of the difference in ET of MP and NP due to differences in vegetation resulting from different management activities and their differential responses to precipitation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:42:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7aac6709dc4c45e888bd2786fb6df14a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:42:43Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-7aac6709dc4c45e888bd2786fb6df14a2023-11-21T02:55:24ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-12-011318210.3390/rs13010082Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie PasturesRajen Bajgain0Xiangming Xiao1Pradeep Wagle2John S. Kimball3Colin Brust4Jeffrey B. Basara5Prasanna Gowda6Patrick J. Starks7James P. S. Neel8Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Spatial Analysis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USAUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Sustainable Water Management Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38756, USAUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK 73036, USANumerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG), The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USANumerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG), The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USASchool of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USAUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Area, Stoneville, MS 38756, USAUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK 73036, USAUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK 73036, USAGrasslands in the Southern Great Plains of the United States have major ecological and economic importance, with strong climate and water cycle connections. The historic native prairie grassland has been managed differently for enhancing productivity, while consequently altering water vapor fluxes. However, little is known about the impacts of different management activities on evapotranspiration (ET) at different spatio-temporal scales. In this study, we quantified and compared ET between co-located introduced managed pasture (MP) and native prairie (NP) pasture. Additionally, we compared the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived ET at four different spatial scales: 30 m (ET<sub>MOD30</sub>), 200 m (ET<sub>MOD200</sub>), 500 m (ET<sub>MOD500</sub>), and 1000 m (ET<sub>MOD1000</sub>) with eddy covariance-measured ET (ET<sub>EC</sub>). Large differences in ET<sub>EC</sub> were observed between two pastures from half-hourly to seasonal scales, with variations mainly controlled by the amount of rainfall and management activities. The results demonstrated differential responses of MP and NP in a pluvial year. The ET<sub>MOD30</sub> showed a better agreement with ET<sub>EC</sub> than did the ET<sub>MOD200</sub>, ET<sub>MOD500</sub>, and ET<sub>MOD1000</sub>. The ET<sub>MOD200</sub>, ET<sub>MOD500</sub>, and ET<sub>MOD1000</sub> largely underestimated ET<sub>EC</sub>, most likely due to their inability to capture the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation growth impacted by various management activities. Our results facilitate understanding of the difference in ET of MP and NP due to differences in vegetation resulting from different management activities and their differential responses to precipitation.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/1/82evapotranspirationnative prairiemanaged prairiespatial scales
spellingShingle Rajen Bajgain
Xiangming Xiao
Pradeep Wagle
John S. Kimball
Colin Brust
Jeffrey B. Basara
Prasanna Gowda
Patrick J. Starks
James P. S. Neel
Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures
Remote Sensing
evapotranspiration
native prairie
managed prairie
spatial scales
title Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures
title_full Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures
title_fullStr Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures
title_short Comparing Evapotranspiration Products of Different Temporal and Spatial Scales in Native and Managed Prairie Pastures
title_sort comparing evapotranspiration products of different temporal and spatial scales in native and managed prairie pastures
topic evapotranspiration
native prairie
managed prairie
spatial scales
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/1/82
work_keys_str_mv AT rajenbajgain comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT xiangmingxiao comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT pradeepwagle comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT johnskimball comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT colinbrust comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT jeffreybbasara comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT prasannagowda comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT patrickjstarks comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures
AT jamespsneel comparingevapotranspirationproductsofdifferenttemporalandspatialscalesinnativeandmanagedprairiepastures