A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada

Introduction: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) can be used to treat neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Clinical and institutional variances in MIST utilization persist globally with little published research regarding MIST utilization in Cana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaily Brahmbhatt, Brooke Read, Orlando Da Silva, Soume Bhattacharya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists 2022-07-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cjrt.ca/wp-content/uploads/cjrt-2022-011.pdf
_version_ 1811339493947473920
author Shaily Brahmbhatt
Brooke Read
Orlando Da Silva
Soume Bhattacharya
author_facet Shaily Brahmbhatt
Brooke Read
Orlando Da Silva
Soume Bhattacharya
author_sort Shaily Brahmbhatt
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) can be used to treat neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Clinical and institutional variances in MIST utilization persist globally with little published research regarding MIST utilization in Canada. Therefore, the objective of this study was to survey MIST utilization in NICUs in Canada. Methods: An online survey was emailed to the 33 participating centres of Canadian Neonatal NetworkTM (CNN) Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) Lung Health Group (LHG). Site demographics and surfactant therapy procedural details were categorically collected. Free text and multiple-choice questions were utilized to capture perceived barriers and individual preferences for MIST use. Results: Twenty-eight of 33 participating members of the CNN EPIQ-LHG completed the survey between April 2021 and October 2021 (85%); 17/28 (61%) respondents reported ongoing MIST utilization at their center. Most centers that used MIST techniques administered bovine lipid extract surfactant (68%), commonly using angiocatheters (47%) and purpose-built catheters (41%). MIST was widely used for patients at 26–33 weeks gestational age (88%). Nine centres had never used MIST (32%), and 3 indicated a plan to implement MIST within the next 2 years. Common barriers to MIST use included lack of consensus amongst clinicians (78%), lack of training (56%), and lack of experience with MIST (56%). Conclusion: While MIST is being increasingly used in Canadian NICUs, universal use is yet to be seen. Clinician inexperience and lack of consensus, formal training, and local guidelines contribute to underutilization of MIST. Training workshops, country-wide data collection, and uniform operating protocols are needed to standardize practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:27:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ab989cd9ae54ca689e84c8d63f75154
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2368-6820
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:27:29Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
spelling doaj.art-7ab989cd9ae54ca689e84c8d63f751542022-12-22T02:35:12ZengCanadian Society of Respiratory TherapistsCanadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy2368-68202022-07-015812212610.29390/cjrt-2022-011A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in CanadaShaily BrahmbhattBrooke ReadOrlando Da SilvaSoume BhattacharyaIntroduction: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) can be used to treat neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Clinical and institutional variances in MIST utilization persist globally with little published research regarding MIST utilization in Canada. Therefore, the objective of this study was to survey MIST utilization in NICUs in Canada. Methods: An online survey was emailed to the 33 participating centres of Canadian Neonatal NetworkTM (CNN) Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ) Lung Health Group (LHG). Site demographics and surfactant therapy procedural details were categorically collected. Free text and multiple-choice questions were utilized to capture perceived barriers and individual preferences for MIST use. Results: Twenty-eight of 33 participating members of the CNN EPIQ-LHG completed the survey between April 2021 and October 2021 (85%); 17/28 (61%) respondents reported ongoing MIST utilization at their center. Most centers that used MIST techniques administered bovine lipid extract surfactant (68%), commonly using angiocatheters (47%) and purpose-built catheters (41%). MIST was widely used for patients at 26–33 weeks gestational age (88%). Nine centres had never used MIST (32%), and 3 indicated a plan to implement MIST within the next 2 years. Common barriers to MIST use included lack of consensus amongst clinicians (78%), lack of training (56%), and lack of experience with MIST (56%). Conclusion: While MIST is being increasingly used in Canadian NICUs, universal use is yet to be seen. Clinician inexperience and lack of consensus, formal training, and local guidelines contribute to underutilization of MIST. Training workshops, country-wide data collection, and uniform operating protocols are needed to standardize practice.https://www.cjrt.ca/wp-content/uploads/cjrt-2022-011.pdfneonatesrespiratory distress syndromesurfactantsurvey
spellingShingle Shaily Brahmbhatt
Brooke Read
Orlando Da Silva
Soume Bhattacharya
A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
neonates
respiratory distress syndrome
surfactant
survey
title A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada
title_full A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada
title_fullStr A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada
title_full_unstemmed A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada
title_short A survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in Canada
title_sort survey of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in canada
topic neonates
respiratory distress syndrome
surfactant
survey
url https://www.cjrt.ca/wp-content/uploads/cjrt-2022-011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shailybrahmbhatt asurveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada
AT brookeread asurveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada
AT orlandodasilva asurveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada
AT soumebhattacharya asurveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada
AT shailybrahmbhatt surveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada
AT brookeread surveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada
AT orlandodasilva surveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada
AT soumebhattacharya surveyofminimallyinvasivesurfactanttherapyincanada