Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review
Abstract Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. This review aimed to summarise evidence on the key features, usability and benefits of CVD risk calculators using digital platforms for CVDs prevention and management in populations. Methods...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13944-w |
_version_ | 1828238226547015680 |
---|---|
author | Mohammed Abd ElFattah Mohammed Darwesh Badawy Lin Naing Sofian Johar Sokking Ong Hanif Abdul Rahman Dayangku Siti Nur Ashikin Pengiran Tengah Chean Lin Chong Nik Ani Afiqah Tuah |
author_facet | Mohammed Abd ElFattah Mohammed Darwesh Badawy Lin Naing Sofian Johar Sokking Ong Hanif Abdul Rahman Dayangku Siti Nur Ashikin Pengiran Tengah Chean Lin Chong Nik Ani Afiqah Tuah |
author_sort | Mohammed Abd ElFattah Mohammed Darwesh Badawy |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. This review aimed to summarise evidence on the key features, usability and benefits of CVD risk calculators using digital platforms for CVDs prevention and management in populations. Methods We used search engines and thematic analyses to conduct a scoping review. As the reporting guideline for this review, we used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Results A total of 17 studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the analysis, from which about 70% of the studies have prognostic level I (n = 8) and level II (n = 4) evidence. The review found that various guidelines are recommending different algorithms for CVD risk prediction. The QRISK® was the most accurate CVD risk calculator for several study populations, whereas World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) risk scores were the least accurate. The key features of CVD risk calculators are variables, predictive accuracy, discrimination index, applicability, understandability, and cost-effectiveness. Conclusion For the selected risk prediction tool, development and validation research must be done, which considers a mix of stroke-specific risk and CVD risk to establish its usability in the local community and advantages to the particular health-care environment. To get healthcare professionals more involved in preventing and treating CVDs, each healthcare setting should use an online CVD risk assessment tool that is more useful, accurate, and easy to use, based on the population and health system. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T21:01:22Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7ad6c8af31ab4990bbd36eec4e5de61b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2458 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T21:01:22Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Public Health |
spelling | doaj.art-7ad6c8af31ab4990bbd36eec4e5de61b2022-12-22T03:16:50ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582022-09-0122111110.1186/s12889-022-13944-wEvaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping reviewMohammed Abd ElFattah Mohammed Darwesh Badawy0Lin Naing1Sofian Johar2Sokking Ong3Hanif Abdul Rahman4Dayangku Siti Nur Ashikin Pengiran Tengah5Chean Lin Chong6Nik Ani Afiqah Tuah7PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei DarussalamPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei DarussalamPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei DarussalamNCD Prevention Unit, Ministry of HealthPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei DarussalamBrunei Neuroscience Stroke and Rehabilitation Centre, Pantai Jerudong Specialist CentreRaja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha HospitalPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei DarussalamAbstract Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. This review aimed to summarise evidence on the key features, usability and benefits of CVD risk calculators using digital platforms for CVDs prevention and management in populations. Methods We used search engines and thematic analyses to conduct a scoping review. As the reporting guideline for this review, we used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Results A total of 17 studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the analysis, from which about 70% of the studies have prognostic level I (n = 8) and level II (n = 4) evidence. The review found that various guidelines are recommending different algorithms for CVD risk prediction. The QRISK® was the most accurate CVD risk calculator for several study populations, whereas World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) risk scores were the least accurate. The key features of CVD risk calculators are variables, predictive accuracy, discrimination index, applicability, understandability, and cost-effectiveness. Conclusion For the selected risk prediction tool, development and validation research must be done, which considers a mix of stroke-specific risk and CVD risk to establish its usability in the local community and advantages to the particular health-care environment. To get healthcare professionals more involved in preventing and treating CVDs, each healthcare setting should use an online CVD risk assessment tool that is more useful, accurate, and easy to use, based on the population and health system.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13944-wCardiovascular diseasesRisk calculatorRisk assessmentCVD riskDigital healthPopulation health |
spellingShingle | Mohammed Abd ElFattah Mohammed Darwesh Badawy Lin Naing Sofian Johar Sokking Ong Hanif Abdul Rahman Dayangku Siti Nur Ashikin Pengiran Tengah Chean Lin Chong Nik Ani Afiqah Tuah Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review BMC Public Health Cardiovascular diseases Risk calculator Risk assessment CVD risk Digital health Population health |
title | Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review |
title_full | Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review |
title_short | Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review |
title_sort | evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for cvds prevention and management scoping review |
topic | Cardiovascular diseases Risk calculator Risk assessment CVD risk Digital health Population health |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13944-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammedabdelfattahmohammeddarweshbadawy evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview AT linnaing evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview AT sofianjohar evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview AT sokkingong evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview AT hanifabdulrahman evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview AT dayangkusitinurashikinpengirantengah evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview AT cheanlinchong evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview AT nikaniafiqahtuah evaluationofcardiovasculardiseasesriskcalculatorsforcvdspreventionandmanagementscopingreview |